Yes, is the answer to every such rhetorical question.
Now, no one cares about women's basketball, nor do I, but this is about the continuous process of separating us from reality. In this case, we're all supposed to be gaga over a strong and capable female athlete who is actually just a guy.
Since no one cares about girls' hoops, the WNBA needs all the press it can get and Caitlin Clark has set ladies' basketball on fire in a historic way. So why this baffling development?
Caitlin Clark SNUBBED from US Olympic Team – THE GREATEST SHOOTER OF ALL TIME! – Like Leaving Michael Jordan Off Dream Team! – WTH? (TGP 6/8/2024)
I'll tell you why: if he goes to the Olympics, he'll have to undergo mandatory sex verification. Because it's international, they have less or no control, and either cannot or would simply prefer not to try to dodge this. Better to just take the minimal "L" now of a "decision you might disagree with" and keep the psyop running.
I could stand to be corrected because it's choked in detail and gobbledygook, but from my study of the page "Sex verification in sports", it looks like the IOC does some form of sex verification but the WNBA is not even mentioned.
The program of "inversion of reality" has been long-running, and with all the trannies floating around I started to suspect something as soon as Caitlin's end-of-the-bell-curve performance started to spill over into general news. And take one look at the guy: do you see a very muscular and masculine woman (like everyone else in the WNBA) or a feminine man?
That Caitlin is actually just a man playing against women--in a sport that desperately needs all the positive press it can get--also explains the strange and brutal reception he has gotten from his sororal athletes:
Indiana Congressman Jim Banks Calls on WNBA to Take Action to Protect Rookie Caitlin Clark from Attacks (TGP 6/7/2024)
I'd say some (or many or all) of the women he plays against know or strongly suspect the truth, and they rightfully resent both the unfairness and the deception. But I think we all know what happens to athletes that have the temerity to say what they actually think: they quickly get reminded that all their names are actually Toby. So we get what is called "acting out".
For the final insult to the intelligence that no one appears to have any more, we are given the "reason" for Caitlin's failure to make the squad:
Team USA veterans were concerned about how Caitlin Clark's millions of fans would react to her likely limited playing time on a stacked Olympic roster....
Check my math, but now his fans will see his playing time limited to zero minutes as he sits at home. That's average on a per game basis, of course.
EDIT: After posting, I noticed this other post, which did not have any of the same reasoning but just coincidentally (I guess!) came on the same day:
Caitlin Clark is a Dude? (r/conspiracy 6/8/2024)
It was downvoted to oblivion among supposed "conspiracy theorists", so I think we can take that as confirmation of the thesis. It all becomes very transparent after a while, doesn't it?
Yes, is the answer to every such rhetorical question.
Now, no one cares about women's basketball, nor do I, but this is about the continuous process of separating us from reality. In this case, we're all supposed to be gaga over a strong and capable female athlete who is actually just a guy.
Since no one cares about girls' hoops, the WNBA needs all the press it can get and Caitlin Clark has set ladies' basketball on fire in a historic way. So why this baffling development?
Caitlin Clark SNUBBED from US Olympic Team – THE GREATEST SHOOTER OF ALL TIME! – Like Leaving Michael Jordan Off Dream Team! – WTH? (TGP 6/8/2024)
I'll tell you why: if he goes to the Olympics, he'll have to undergo mandatory sex verification. Because it's international, they have less or no control, and either cannot or would simply prefer not to try to dodge this. Better to just take the minimal "L" now of a "decision you might disagree with" and keep the psyop running.
I could stand to be corrected because it's choked in detail and gobbledygook, but from my study of the page "Sex verification in sports", it looks like the IOC does some form of sex verification but the WNBA is not even mentioned.
The program of "inversion of reality" has been long-running, and with all the trannies floating around I started to suspect something as soon as Caitlin's end-of-the-bell-curve performance started to spill over into general news. And take one look at the guy: do you see a very muscular and masculine woman (like everyone else in the WNBA) or a feminine man?
That Caitlin is actually just a man playing against women--in a sport that desperately needs all the positive press it can get--also explains the strange and brutal reception he has gotten from his sororal athletes:
Indiana Congressman Jim Banks Calls on WNBA to Take Action to Protect Rookie Caitlin Clark from Attacks (TGP 6/7/2024)
I'd say some (or many or all) of the women he plays against know or strongly suspect the truth, and they rightfully resent both the unfairness and the deception. But I think we all know what happens to athletes that have the temerity to say what they actually think: they quickly get reminded that all their names are actually Toby. So we get what is called "acting out".
For the final insult to the intelligence that no one appears to have any more, we are given the "reason" for Caitlin's failure to make the squad:
Team USA veterans were concerned about how Caitlin Clark's millions of fans would react to her likely limited playing time on a stacked Olympic roster....
Check my math, but now his fans will see his playing time limited to zero minutes as he sits at home. That's average on a per game basis, of course.