I gave you two dates before 3 BC (add: and before 3rd century BC), one was about Solomon's son; sounds like you're reading too quickly.

Yes, Moses, David, and Solomon are generally unattested as such in archaeology. But the Hyksos expulsion of the 1530s BC is well-attested in archaeology, and it involves hundreds of thousands of Semites leaving the realm of Aravis (Goshen) and returning to the Levant.

There are many more records. If you judge them the same way Egyptian and Sumerian history are judged, you obtain the evidence you seek. Every time I've tested this I've found it true.

However, I respect that you have a body of evidence and disagree, which is why I asked you questions that you don't seem to have answered. You make an extraordinary claim that the entire gamut of Biblical characters are not historical, but we have inscriptions and records about Caesar Augustus and Pontius Pilate, about Nebuchadnezzar and Artaxerxes. So your claim appears insufficiently stated. I'm interested in your theory of how the alleged deception could have happened historically, and what the historical proof is, and what you think humanity ought to do as a result. If you answer by batting away my questions, it might indicate to people that you have no argument and are just overreaching.

I gave you two dates before 3 BC, one was about Solomon's son; sounds like you're reading too quickly.

Yes, Moses, David, and Solomon are generally unattested as such in archaeology. But the Hyksos expulsion of the 1530s BC is well-attested in archaeology, and it involves hundreds of thousands of Semites leaving the realm of Aravis (Goshen) and returning to the Levant.

There are many more records. If you judge them the same way Egyptian and Sumerian history are judged, you obtain the evidence you seek. Every time I've tested this I've found it true.

However, I respect that you have a body of evidence and disagree, which is why I asked you questions that you don't seem to have answered. You make an extraordinary claim that the entire gamut of Biblical characters are not historical, but we have inscriptions and records about Caesar Augustus and Pontius Pilate, about Nebuchadnezzar and Artaxerxes. So your claim appears insufficiently stated. I'm interested in your theory of how the alleged deception could have happened historically, and what the historical proof is, and what you think humanity ought to do as a result. If you answer by batting away my questions, it might indicate to people that you have no argument and are just overreaching.