in th.

You and I have a very different understanding of that verse. You're pretty obsessed with the outward appearance of devotion and obsessed with

enforcing specific marks of belief,

Like that Jesus is God and the Resurrection happened?

but beyond avoidance of the most obvious and egregious sins

there's not much to suggest that your inner life is actually godly,

That's say-able of literally everyone online who hasn't doxed themselves. Useless statement.

and you doubt the power of God to save anyone who might have a different interpretation than yourself.

"If evolution were true, explain why atheists gravitate to it"

Why would being true repel them? You act like an atheist would deny that the two of us are communicating in English, because it is true and atheists are allergic to any form of truth.

It is true that many atheists latch on hard to the furthest stretches of what evolution might imply (i.e. pure, unaided abiogenesis) because it allows them to bypass the largest claim for the existence of God (namely that if there is no God, then there is no universe).

But it is not true that just because many atheists latch on to it that it must be the opposite of the truth. Evolution is derived from observation of large amounts of data, which I know you haven't examined in any degree of honesty -- and by that I mean without having AnswersInGenesis at the ready. The only other conclusion if there is no evolution is that God is more like the Norse deity Loki than the Canaanite deity Jehovah, deliberately planting evidence of a lie just to make people disbelieve.

You and I have a very different understanding of that verse. You're pretty obsessed with the outward appearance of devotion and obsessed with

enforcing specific marks of belief,

Like that Jesus is God and the Resurrection happened?

but beyond avoidance of the most obvious and egregious sins

there's not much to suggest that your inner life is actually godly,

That's say-able of literally everyone online who hasn't doxed themselves. Useless statement.

and you doubt the power of God to save anyone who might have a different interpretation than yourself.

"If evolution were true, explain why atheists gravitate to it"

Why would being true repel them? You act like an atheist would deny that the two of us are communicating in English, because it is true and atheists are allergic to any form of truth.

It is true that many atheists latch on hard to the furthest stretches of what evolution might imply (i.e. pure, unaided abiogenesis) because it allows them to bypass the largest claim for the existence of God (namely that if there is no God, then there is no universe).

But it is not true that just because many atheists latch on to it that it must be the opposite of the truth. Evolution is derived from observation of large amounts of data, which I know you haven't examined in any degree of honesty -- and by that I mean without having AnswersInGenesis at the ready. The only other conclusion if there is no evolution is that God is more like the Norse deity Loki than the Canaanite deity Jehovah, deliberately planting evidence of a lie just to make people disbelieve.