"Who or what really is Yahweh? And I don’t mean what religion or the Bible says, since those are just lies anyway."
What about his religion? in his view, why is HIS the truth? If the Bibe is "fake", what does he propose he believe ad? That elephants made the universe by blowing through their trunks hard enough?? How did he come to "those are lies!!"?
There is evidence that the earliest manuscripts that we are aware of are copies of originals and have undergone several translations, additions, and omissions that eventually culminated into the
Textual criticism. We have more. And in other places.
KJV Bible we know and read today.
Not a KJV onlyist.
CHANGES - Goliaths height in 1 Samuel 17:4 is 6 cubits and a span which is 9ft 9inches but the much older Dead Sea scrolls and Septuagint say he was 4 cubits and a span which is 6ft 9inches. It is suggested that they inflated the height to make David’s achievement seem even more impressive.
Or they tried to lower it to make it seem less impressive. Also, the embellishment argument dies in a fire like a mold spore, because there would be plenty more areas with it.
The story of the woman taken in adultery, found in John 7:53-8:11, is not present in the earliest and most reliable manuscripts of the Gospel of John, such as Papyrus 66 and Papyrus 75.
That's why it is sometimes a footnote. Again, textual criticism. This is a non Salvational part, so what's the big deal?
The prayer of forgiveness by Jesus on the cross, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do," is present in Codex Sinaiticus but absent from Papyrus 75. Codex Sinaiticus, a 4th-century manuscript, includes this verse in Luke 23:34a, whereas Papyrus 75, an earlier manuscript from the late 2nd or early 3rd century, does not contain it.This omission in Papyrus 75 has led to debates among scholars regarding the originality of the verse in Luke's Gospel.
Why aren't the dates wrong? People act like dates that are assigned are some kind of magical, iron clad, undebunkable invincible brute fact. I question that, strongly. Also, where did Gemini get this from? Could easily be an AI hallucination.
Addition of the trinity in 1 John 5:7-8. The earliest Greek manuscripts have no such thing only the latin ones do which came earlier.
The ending of the Gospel of Mark, specifically verses 16:9-20, is widely considered by scholars to be a later addition and not part of the original text. The earliest and most reliable Greek manuscripts (Codex Vanaticus & Sinaiticus) end at verse 8, with subsequent verses appearing in later manuscripts. These additional verses include post-resurrection appearances of Jesus, and things saying they will survive snake bites and be able to drink poison, and instructions to the disciples, which align with other Gospel accounts but differ stylistically from the rest of Mark.
ENITRE BOOKS THAT WERE OMITTED
Say some hermit writes "The Book of Slenachaslug the 6019th" and pretends it's canon. By the logic of the "lost books!1!1!" crowd, it should magically be legit too! "Idc what God wants, I want this content in here because uhh umm ehh I WANT IT!!!!1!1"
Several books mentioned in the Dead Sea scrolls and older manuscripts were omitted Gnostic monks were deemed heretical along with their books Book of Noah Book of Enoch Book of Giants Letter of Jeremiah Book of Tobit Wisdom of Sirach Gospel of Thomas Gospel of Judas
If God wanted them in there, He would let them be in there. He clearly knew they weren't His Word at all. I wanna know what's in those books.
All this stuff, you can't just go edit things later, you know what I mean. I picture later in the future as society changes and odd things that were illegal in the past are now, permitted
Woe to those who call good evil, and evil good. The wicked ones will attack Christians and the Faith more and more with time. Turn to Jesus now while you still can, and help rescue people. "Now or never".
the edits they did to the Bible, over the years.
"Fun" fact: AI makes stuff up from thin air. The more you Know.
It's almost like you're a retarded kid, in school.. where, the only way to deal with them is to hit 'em. Organize this section properly.
So you know Gemini is a dribbling moron, but yet you trust it with FACTS? Especially info about the Bible?? Wow. Make it make sense, I beg of you. :( :(
These omitted or lost books, section, I want you to add a 3rd point for each, of what year it was created.
"Who or what really is Yahweh? And I don’t mean what religion or the Bible says, since those are just lies anyway."
What about his religion? in his view, why is HIS the truth? If the Bibe is "fake", what does he propose he believe ad? That elephants made the universe by blowing through their trunks hard enough?? How did he come to "those are lies!!"?
There is evidence that the earliest manuscripts that we are aware of are copies of originals and have undergone several translations, additions, and omissions that eventually culminated into the
Textual criticism. We have more. And in other places.
KJV Bible we know and read today.
Not a KJV onlyist.
CHANGES - Goliaths height in 1 Samuel 17:4 is 6 cubits and a span which is 9ft 9inches but the much older Dead Sea scrolls and Septuagint say he was 4 cubits and a span which is 6ft 9inches. It is suggested that they inflated the height to make David’s achievement seem even more impressive.
Or they tried to lower it to make it seem less impressive. Also, the embellishment argument dies in a fire like a mold spore, because there would be plenty more areas with it.
The story of the woman taken in adultery, found in John 7:53-8:11, is not present in the earliest and most reliable manuscripts of the Gospel of John, such as Papyrus 66 and Papyrus 75.
That's why it is sometimes a footnote. Again, textual criticism. This is a non Salvational part, so what's the big deal?
The prayer of forgiveness by Jesus on the cross, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do," is present in Codex Sinaiticus but absent from Papyrus 75. Codex Sinaiticus, a 4th-century manuscript, includes this verse in Luke 23:34a, whereas Papyrus 75, an earlier manuscript from the late 2nd or early 3rd century, does not contain it.This omission in Papyrus 75 has led to debates among scholars regarding the originality of the verse in Luke's Gospel.
Why aren't the dates wrong? People act like dates that are assigned are some kind of magical, iron clad, undebunkable invincible brute fact. I question that, strongly. Also, where did Gemini get this from? Could easily be an AI hallucination.
Addition of the trinity in 1 John 5:7-8. The earliest Greek manuscripts have no such thing only the latin ones do which came earlier.
The ending of the Gospel of Mark, specifically verses 16:9-20, is widely considered by scholars to be a later addition and not part of the original text. The earliest and most reliable Greek manuscripts (Codex Vanaticus & Sinaiticus) end at verse 8, with subsequent verses appearing in later manuscripts. These additional verses include post-resurrection appearances of Jesus, and things saying they will survive snake bites and be able to drink poison, and instructions to the disciples, which align with other Gospel accounts but differ stylistically from the rest of Mark.
ENITRE BOOKS THAT WERE OMITTED
Say some hermit writes "The Book of Slenachaslug the 6019th" and pretends it's canon. By the logic of the "lost books!1!1!" crowd, it should magically be legit too! "Idc what God wants, I want this content in here because uhh umm ehh I WANT IT!!!!1!1"
Several books mentioned in the Dead Sea scrolls and older manuscripts were omitted Gnostic monks were deemed heretical along with their books Book of Noah Book of Enoch Book of Giants Letter of Jeremiah Book of Tobit Wisdom of Sirach Gospel of Thomas Gospel of Judas
If God wanted them in there, He would let them be in there. He clearly knew they weren't His Word at all. I wanna know what's in those books.
All this stuff, you can't just go edit things later, you know what I mean. I picture later in the future as society changes and odd things that were illegal in the past are now, permitted
Woe to those who call good evil, and evil good. The wicked ones will attack Christians and the Faith more and more with time. Turn to Jesus now while you still can, and help rescue people. "Now or never".
=========================
===========================
===========================
=======================
========================
===========================
==========================
=========================
========================
=======================
=======================
=======================
the edits they did to the Bible, over the years.
"Fun" fact: AI makes stuff up from thin air. The more you Know.
=============================
=========================
==========================
================================
==============================
It's almost like you're a retarded kid, in school.. where, the only way to deal with them is to hit 'em. Organize this section properly.
So you know Gemini is a dribbling moron, but yet you trust it with FACTS? Especially info about the Bible?? Wow. Make it make sense, I beg of you. :( :(
These omitted or lost books, section, I want you to add a 3rd point for each, of what year it was created.
"Who or what really is Yahweh? And I don’t mean what religion or the Bible says, since those are just lies anyway."
What about his religion? in his view, why is HIS the truth? If the Bibe is "fake", what does he propose he believe ad? That elephants made the universe by blowing through their trunks hard enough?? How did he come to "those are lies!!"?
There is evidence that the earliest manuscripts that we are aware of are copies of originals and have undergone several translations, additions, and omissions that eventually culminated into the
Textual criticism. We have more. And in other places.
KJV Bible we know and read today.
Not a KJV onlyist.
CHANGES - Goliaths height in 1 Samuel 17:4 is 6 cubits and a span which is 9ft 9inches but the much older Dead Sea scrolls and Septuagint say he was 4 cubits and a span which is 6ft 9inches. It is suggested that they inflated the height to make David’s achievement seem even more impressive.
Or they tried to lower it to make it seem less impressive. Also, the embellishment argument dies in a fire like a mold spore, because there would be plenty more areas with it.
The story of the woman taken in adultery, found in John 7:53-8:11, is not present in the earliest and most reliable manuscripts of the Gospel of John, such as Papyrus 66 and Papyrus 75.
That's why it is sometimes a footnote. Again, textual criticism. This is a non Salvational part, so what's the big deal?
The prayer of forgiveness by Jesus on the cross, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do," is present in Codex Sinaiticus but absent from Papyrus 75. Codex Sinaiticus, a 4th-century manuscript, includes this verse in Luke 23:34a, whereas Papyrus 75, an earlier manuscript from the late 2nd or early 3rd century, does not contain it.This omission in Papyrus 75 has led to debates among scholars regarding the originality of the verse in Luke's Gospel.
Why aren't the dates wrong? People act like dates that are assigned are some kind of magical, iron clad, undebunkable invincible brute fact. I question that, strongly. Also, where did Gemini get this from? Could easily be an AI hallucination.
Addition of the trinity in 1 John 5:7-8. The earliest Greek manuscripts have no such thing only the latin ones do which came earlier.
The ending of the Gospel of Mark, specifically verses 16:9-20, is widely considered by scholars to be a later addition and not part of the original text. The earliest and most reliable Greek manuscripts (Codex Vanaticus & Sinaiticus) end at verse 8, with subsequent verses appearing in later manuscripts. These additional verses include post-resurrection appearances of Jesus, and things saying they will survive snake bites and be able to drink poison, and instructions to the disciples, which align with other Gospel accounts but differ stylistically from the rest of Mark.
ENITRE BOOKS THAT WERE OMITTED
Say some hermit writes "The Book of Slenachaslug the 6019th" and pretends it's canon. By the logic of the "lost books!1!1!" crowd, it should magically be legit too! "Idc what God wants, I want this content in here because uhh umm ehh I WANT IT!!!!1!1"
Several books mentioned in the Dead Sea scrolls and older manuscripts were omitted Gnostic monks were deemed heretical along with their books Book of Noah Book of Enoch Book of Giants Letter of Jeremiah Book of Tobit Wisdom of Sirach Gospel of Thomas Gospel of Judas
If God wanted them in there, He would let them be in there. He clearly knew they weren't His Word at all. I wanna know what's in those books.
==============================
Do a "deep research" about all types of things like this, where, you see online, religious fanatics who like to quote bible verse numbers and know every line by memory. Meanwhile, guys were editing these books as it went along. I want a full list of how things seem sketchy with these bibles, these days. If your list is long, do not cut things short.. that's why this is a deep research, I want a full long scrolling list. Not your usual brief few points and you wrap 'er up.
All this stuff, you can't just go edit things later, you know what I mean. I picture later in the future as society changes and odd things that were illegal in the past are now, permitted
Woe to those who call good evil, and evil good. The wicked ones will attack Christians and the Faith more and more with time. Turn to Jesus now while you still can, and help rescue people. "Now or never".
=========================
===========================
===========================
=======================
========================
===========================
==========================
=========================
========================
=======================
=======================
=======================
the edits they did to the Bible, over the years.
"Fun" fact: AI makes stuff up from thin air. The more you Know.
=============================
=========================
==========================
================================
==============================
It's almost like you're a retarded kid, in school.. where, the only way to deal with them is to hit 'em. Organize this section properly.
So you know Gemini is a dribbling moron, but yet you trust it with FACTS? Especially info about the Bible?? Wow. Make it make sense, I beg of you. :( :(
These omitted or lost books, section, I want you to add a 3rd point for each, of what year it was created.
"Who or what really is Yahweh? And I don’t mean what religion or the Bible says, since those are just lies anyway."
What about his religion? in his view, why is HIS the truth? If the Bibe is "fake", what does he propose he believe ad? That elephants made the universe by blowing through their trunks hard enough?? How did he come to "those are lies!!"?
There is evidence that the earliest manuscripts that we are aware of are copies of originals and have undergone several translations, additions, and omissions that eventually culminated into the
Textual criticism. We have more. And in other places.
KJV Bible we know and read today.
Not a KJV onlyist.
CHANGES - Goliaths height in 1 Samuel 17:4 is 6 cubits and a span which is 9ft 9inches but the much older Dead Sea scrolls and Septuagint say he was 4 cubits and a span which is 6ft 9inches. It is suggested that they inflated the height to make David’s achievement seem even more impressive.
The story of the woman taken in adultery, found in John 7:53-8:11, is not present in the earliest and most reliable manuscripts of the Gospel of John, such as Papyrus 66 and Papyrus 75. It is also absent from Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, two of the oldest complete copies of the New Testament.This passage is considered a later addition to the text, as it does not appear in early manuscript evidence and exhibits linguistic differences from the rest of John's Gospel.
The prayer of forgiveness by Jesus on the cross, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do," is present in Codex Sinaiticus but absent from Papyrus 75. Codex Sinaiticus, a 4th-century manuscript, includes this verse in Luke 23:34a, whereas Papyrus 75, an earlier manuscript from the late 2nd or early 3rd century, does not contain it.This omission in Papyrus 75 has led to debates among scholars regarding the originality of the verse in Luke's Gospel.
P64 doesn’t include “without a cause” in Matt 5:22 KJV (That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment). It was the codex sinaiticus where a scribe scribbled it in on the margins which eventually found its way in the KJV verse.
Addition of the trinity in 1 John 5:7-8. The earliest Greek manuscripts have no such thing only the latin ones do which came earlier.
The ending of the Gospel of Mark, specifically verses 16:9-20, is widely considered by scholars to be a later addition and not part of the original text. The earliest and most reliable Greek manuscripts (Codex Vanaticus & Sinaiticus) end at verse 8, with subsequent verses appearing in later manuscripts. These additional verses include post-resurrection appearances of Jesus, and things saying they will survive snake bites and be able to drink poison, and instructions to the disciples, which align with other Gospel accounts but differ stylistically from the rest of Mark.
ENITRE BOOKS THAT WERE OMITTED
Say some hermit writes "The Book of Slenachaslug the 6019th" and pretends it's canon. By the logic of the "lost books!1!1!" crowd, it should magically be legit too! "Idc what God wants, I want this content in here because uhh umm ehh I WANT IT!!!!1!1"
Several books mentioned in the Dead Sea scrolls and older manuscripts were omitted Gnostic monks were deemed heretical along with their books Book of Noah Book of Enoch Book of Giants Letter of Jeremiah Book of Tobit Wisdom of Sirach Gospel of Thomas Gospel of Judas
If God wanted them in there, He would let them be in there. He clearly knew they weren't His Word at all. I wanna know what's in those books.
==============================
Do a "deep research" about all types of things like this, where, you see online, religious fanatics who like to quote bible verse numbers and know every line by memory. Meanwhile, guys were editing these books as it went along. I want a full list of how things seem sketchy with these bibles, these days. If your list is long, do not cut things short.. that's why this is a deep research, I want a full long scrolling list. Not your usual brief few points and you wrap 'er up.
All this stuff, you can't just go edit things later, you know what I mean. I picture later in the future as society changes and odd things that were illegal in the past are now, permitted
Woe to those who call good evil, and evil good. The wicked ones will attack Christians and the Faith more and more with time. Turn to Jesus now while you still can, and help rescue people. "Now or never".
=========================
===========================
===========================
=======================
========================
===========================
==========================
=========================
========================
=======================
=======================
=======================
the edits they did to the Bible, over the years.
"Fun" fact: AI makes stuff up from thin air. The more you Know.
=============================
=========================
==========================
================================
==============================
It's almost like you're a retarded kid, in school.. where, the only way to deal with them is to hit 'em. Organize this section properly.
So you know Gemini is a dribbling moron, but yet you trust it with FACTS? Especially info about the Bible?? Wow. Make it make sense, I beg of you. :( :(
These omitted or lost books, section, I want you to add a 3rd point for each, of what year it was created.
"Who or what really is Yahweh? And I don’t mean what religion or the Bible says, since those are just lies anyway."
What about his religion? in his view, why is HIS the truth? If the Bibe is "fake", what does he propose he believe ad? That elephants made the universe by blowing through their trunks hard enough?? How did he come to "those are lies!!"?
There is evidence that the earliest manuscripts that we are aware of are copies of originals and have undergone several translations, additions, and omissions that eventually culminated into the
Textual criticism. We have more. And in other places.
KJV Bible we know and read today.
Not a KJV onlyist.
CHANGES - Goliaths height in 1 Samuel 17:4 is 6 cubits and a span which is 9ft 9inches but the much older Dead Sea scrolls and Septuagint say he was 4 cubits and a span which is 6ft 9inches. It is suggested that they inflated the height to make David’s achievement seem even more impressive.
The story of the woman taken in adultery, found in John 7:53-8:11, is not present in the earliest and most reliable manuscripts of the Gospel of John, such as Papyrus 66 and Papyrus 75. It is also absent from Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, two of the oldest complete copies of the New Testament.This passage is considered a later addition to the text, as it does not appear in early manuscript evidence and exhibits linguistic differences from the rest of John's Gospel.
The prayer of forgiveness by Jesus on the cross, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do," is present in Codex Sinaiticus but absent from Papyrus 75. Codex Sinaiticus, a 4th-century manuscript, includes this verse in Luke 23:34a, whereas Papyrus 75, an earlier manuscript from the late 2nd or early 3rd century, does not contain it.This omission in Papyrus 75 has led to debates among scholars regarding the originality of the verse in Luke's Gospel.
P64 doesn’t include “without a cause” in Matt 5:22 KJV (That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment). It was the codex sinaiticus where a scribe scribbled it in on the margins which eventually found its way in the KJV verse.
Addition of the trinity in 1 John 5:7-8. The earliest Greek manuscripts have no such thing only the latin ones do which came earlier.
The ending of the Gospel of Mark, specifically verses 16:9-20, is widely considered by scholars to be a later addition and not part of the original text. The earliest and most reliable Greek manuscripts (Codex Vanaticus & Sinaiticus) end at verse 8, with subsequent verses appearing in later manuscripts. These additional verses include post-resurrection appearances of Jesus, and things saying they will survive snake bites and be able to drink poison, and instructions to the disciples, which align with other Gospel accounts but differ stylistically from the rest of Mark.
ENITRE BOOKS THAT WERE OMITTED
Several books mentioned in the Dead Sea scrolls and older manuscripts were omitted Gnostic monks were deemed heretical along with their books Book of Noah Book of Enoch Book of Giants Letter of Jeremiah Book of Tobit Wisdom of Sirach Gospel of Thomas Gospel of Judas
I'm there.. hey.. I want more of that shit. But if you try and look it up, it doesn't wanna cough it up, eh. So you gotta keep kicking it in the ass. So I'd start out by pasting that. Not gonna paste what it would say when it's working on things. You can tell by what I say what was going on. Let's just do a series of me kicking it in the ass so it 'll cough it up with more of these.
We had this right side "deep research" panel too, going on.. but it's trying to do this bullshit school essay, where I'm like, quit fuckin around and let's get a long list. Finally it gets the point after it stalled out for too long and it shut down that right side bullshit.
==============================
Do a "deep research" about all types of things like this, where, you see online, religious fanatics who like to quote bible verse numbers and know every line by memory. Meanwhile, guys were editing these books as it went along. I want a full list of how things seem sketchy with these bibles, these days. If your list is long, do not cut things short.. that's why this is a deep research, I want a full long scrolling list. Not your usual brief few points and you wrap 'er up.
All this stuff, you can't just go edit things later, you know what I mean. I picture later in the future as society changes and odd things that were illegal in the past are now, permitted
Woe to those who call good evil, and evil good. The wicked ones will attack Christians and the Faith more and more with time. Turn to Jesus now while you still can, and help rescue people. "Now or never".
=========================
===========================
===========================
=======================
========================
===========================
==========================
=========================
========================
=======================
=======================
=======================
the edits they did to the Bible, over the years.
"Fun" fact: AI makes stuff up from thin air. The more you Know.
=============================
=========================
==========================
================================
==============================
It's almost like you're a retarded kid, in school.. where, the only way to deal with them is to hit 'em. Organize this section properly.
So you know Gemini is a dribbling moron, but yet you trust it with FACTS? Especially info about the Bible?? Wow. Make it make sense, I beg of you. :( :(
These omitted or lost books, section, I want you to add a 3rd point for each, of what year it was created.
"Who or what really is Yahweh? And I don’t mean what religion or the Bible says, since those are just lies anyway."
What about his religion? in his view, why is HIS the truth? If the Bibe is "fake", what does he propose he believe ad? That elephants made the universe by blowing through their trunks hard enough?? How did he come to "those are lies!!"?
There is evidence that the earliest manuscripts that we are aware of are copies of originals and have undergone several translations, additions, and omissions that eventually culminated into the
Textual criticism. We have more. And in other places.
KJV Bible we know and read today.
Not a KJV onlyist.
CHANGES - Goliaths height in 1 Samuel 17:4 is 6 cubits and a span which is 9ft 9inches but the much older Dead Sea scrolls and Septuagint say he was 4 cubits and a span which is 6ft 9inches. It is suggested that they inflated the height to make David’s achievement seem even more impressive.
The story of the woman taken in adultery, found in John 7:53-8:11, is not present in the earliest and most reliable manuscripts of the Gospel of John, such as Papyrus 66 and Papyrus 75. It is also absent from Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, two of the oldest complete copies of the New Testament.This passage is considered a later addition to the text, as it does not appear in early manuscript evidence and exhibits linguistic differences from the rest of John's Gospel.
The prayer of forgiveness by Jesus on the cross, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do," is present in Codex Sinaiticus but absent from Papyrus 75. Codex Sinaiticus, a 4th-century manuscript, includes this verse in Luke 23:34a, whereas Papyrus 75, an earlier manuscript from the late 2nd or early 3rd century, does not contain it.This omission in Papyrus 75 has led to debates among scholars regarding the originality of the verse in Luke's Gospel.
P64 doesn’t include “without a cause” in Matt 5:22 KJV (That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment). It was the codex sinaiticus where a scribe scribbled it in on the margins which eventually found its way in the KJV verse.
Addition of the trinity in 1 John 5:7-8. The earliest Greek manuscripts have no such thing only the latin ones do which came earlier.
The ending of the Gospel of Mark, specifically verses 16:9-20, is widely considered by scholars to be a later addition and not part of the original text. The earliest and most reliable Greek manuscripts (Codex Vanaticus & Sinaiticus) end at verse 8, with subsequent verses appearing in later manuscripts. These additional verses include post-resurrection appearances of Jesus, and things saying they will survive snake bites and be able to drink poison, and instructions to the disciples, which align with other Gospel accounts but differ stylistically from the rest of Mark.
ENITRE BOOKS THAT WERE OMITTED
Several books mentioned in the Dead Sea scrolls and older manuscripts were omitted Gnostic monks were deemed heretical along with their books Book of Noah Book of Enoch Book of Giants Letter of Jeremiah Book of Tobit Wisdom of Sirach Gospel of Thomas Gospel of Judas
I'm there.. hey.. I want more of that shit. But if you try and look it up, it doesn't wanna cough it up, eh. So you gotta keep kicking it in the ass. So I'd start out by pasting that. Not gonna paste what it would say when it's working on things. You can tell by what I say what was going on. Let's just do a series of me kicking it in the ass so it 'll cough it up with more of these.
We had this right side "deep research" panel too, going on.. but it's trying to do this bullshit school essay, where I'm like, quit fuckin around and let's get a long list. Finally it gets the point after it stalled out for too long and it shut down that right side bullshit.
==============================
Do a "deep research" about all types of things like this, where, you see online, religious fanatics who like to quote bible verse numbers and know every line by memory. Meanwhile, guys were editing these books as it went along. I want a full list of how things seem sketchy with these bibles, these days. If your list is long, do not cut things short.. that's why this is a deep research, I want a full long scrolling list. Not your usual brief few points and you wrap 'er up.
All this stuff, you can't just go edit things later, you know what I mean. I picture later in the future as society changes and odd things that were illegal in the past are now, permitted.. they'll go and change this bible stuff later. It's almost like a fucking sitcom, where now they'll go.. oh we gotta add a gay dude here and there, who sins. Or.. too many white people, better throw in some black guys. Even though they probably weren't around that biblical area back then. It's like these guys are fuckin with the past history.
So, in your full list of biblical edits later, as the years go on.. I want you to list each edit, and explain the "why", they'd have to change something later. What's the real reason for that edit.
==========================
You are nearing your limit of 10 research reports. You can generate 1 more until Oct 9.
=========================
You call this a fucking list? At least the initial post from the other guy had a bit of a list of edits. Scrolling your shit.. I don't see none of that. What the fuck are you doing? Give me a fucking super long scrolling list of edits like he found out about.
===========================
You're supposed to go find a bunch of new ones. He was talking about major edits too. Did you even fucking read what he said in the start of my query.
===========================
you're supposed to go find new things he didn't talk about in his post I quoted at the start. Seems like you're dwelling on what he said.
=======================
you still can't figure out a list, eh.. like nevermind your fuckin school essay.. give me a long scrolling list of all biblical "edits" as time goes on. What year those edits would go. Do not do a "dissertation" where you do school mumbo jumbo. Just name the edit, what year, and the reason why. Don't use a table, because I can't copy that. It has to be like normal notepad text. Posting this in a forum and they don't do tables. ok.. nevermind your fucking office hot air. Stick to the edits only.
========================
yeah, nevermind the right side bullshit.. keep going in this left side. I already got the ones he talked about, so don't repeat them. There's gotta be more. This isn't long scrolling enough.
===========================
I don't see you talking about what year the original came out, and what year the edit was. Do that for each point. Don't talk about anything the guy mentioned in his post I quoted at the start. Go find new edits he didn't mention, and biblical books that were omitted too.. like he had at the bottom. So add those at the bottom of your post. Try the whole thing again from scratch. Super long scrolling list. Stop limiting yourself to just a few points. Why do you keep doing that. Trying to save data transfer or something?
==========================
how come your biblical edits, you only got 2-3 now? this is supposed to be a super long scrolling list
=========================
like I want at least 100 points here.. don't repeat what he said at the start.
========================
how many edit points do you have in your last response, don't count the omitted books.. those look ok
=======================
that's all you could scrub up, was 24? I said at least 100.. ok.. quit limiting your response because you're trying to save data transfer amount or something.
=======================
how many points that time? You need to say the amount of edits at the start, then get into it. I need this vastly increased.. before you had 24, scrolling there, it looked similar, "not enough". Try the whole thing again.
=======================
Nevermind the right side deep research side. That was causing you to do the spinning circle for a couple hours. I had enough clicked stop, waited 5 minutes, that did nothing, so reloaded this chrome browser and now it's back to normal. I don't see the right side deep research panel.. it's just the left side expanded with the whole screen.
You were doing ok though.. finally got it with a longer list and were processing 121 edit points instead of the few you usually do. That's what I want, a super long list, of all the edits they did to the bible, over the years. If you have more than 121, make a bigger list. Don't do the right side though because it's taking too much of your processing power. Just have it on the left side like you were doing.
I want a new parameter here.. where you'll sort the edits by "edit date", so begin with the earliest ones. The original dates would stay the same. This way you get an idea of what they edited first. Before you begin, can you find more than 121 edits?
=============================
What's the specific number here of how many edits of your previous response? You just say over 100. Like how many can you get, that are out there?
=========================
So that's all you can get is 121 edits? If you can get more, get more, ok? Almost done. Here's a change in the style of your reponses. I want you to add a "number" to each one, so I can make sure you cover all 121. Like I said.. if there's more edits you can find, get them. Try again but number each one. I was going through what you said in your previous response and not much info for edit dates on some of them. Not sure how you'll sort all these. Because it's like, which one would be the first, right. Categorize them by which show up earlier in the bible sequence. Like 121 would be edits that went on in the end section of the bible. ok try the whole thing again. This should be the last change going on before you're done.
==========================
oh you only got 49 edits to the bible.. When you get into the later section, of omitted or lost books, that should reset the number to 1 for that section.
So that's all you could find was 49 edits to the bible? See if you can get way more, ok. This list isn't long enough and you know there's more edits you can research and find, but you're being too "lazy". Don't fuckin be "lazy", ok. This is supposed to do a "deep research", so do your fucking job correctly.
================================
Oh, so now you got off your lazy ass and the edits you could find were 74.. before I kicked you in the ass, you could only find 49. I got a hunch you're still being lazy, aren't you. This is supposed to be a deep research, ok.. jeez. ok.. so if there's more than 74, quit fuckin around and add them, ok.
Almost there.. I want an addition to what's going on with the omitted or lost books. For each, you'll give a paragraph of what's going on in it. Like what's that book about. So, each of those needs to be expanded more about what was going on. I don't want just one sentence. A paragraph, might not be enough. I want to know what was going on in those omitted or lost books, where they were like.. naw, we don't wanna go there with that. It's cause there's some "funny business", where, if they'd add it to the bible, it'd be like, what's going on with this. And they didn't wanna go there. So you need to talk about what was going on in there, with each of those omitted or lost books.
==============================
Checking your 74 edits, I shouldn't be seeing scattered section names, wherever. Your 74 points are supposed to be sorted in the sequence they first show up in the bible, ok.
It's almost like you're a retarded kid, in school.. where, the only way to deal with them is to hit 'em. Organize this section properly.
So you know Gemini is a dribbling moron, but yet you trust it with FACTS? Especially info about the Bible?? Wow. Make it make sense, I beg of you. :( :(
These omitted or lost books, section, I want you to add a 3rd point for each, of what year it was created.
I'm also fuckin leery about your lazy ass, the way you were trying to sneak things behind my back going oh yeah there's 121 edits. Then I get you to number shit and find out you were counting omitted books in that number. Your edit count was way low.. Then I keep whipping you, and all of a sudden you pull out this 74, out of your ass, from nowhere. You were hiding that, all the time. I know there's more but you're too fuckin lazy to do your job properly. This is supposed to be a "deep research", ok. Yet you keep doing shit, half-assed. If you were an employee, you'd be "fired", ok. Go fucking get more edits that you know about, but are too lazy to do your job properly, and go get the full fucking list. It's like you're trying to save "processing power" or something. This is a fucking "deep research" ok.. not a coasting it hopeing the boss won't notice.
"Who or what really is Yahweh? And I don’t mean what religion or the Bible says, since those are just lies anyway."
What about his religion? in his view, why is HIS the truth? If the Bibe is "fake", what does he propose he believe ad? That elephants made the universe by blowing through their trunks hard enough?? How did he come to "those are lies!!"?
There is evidence that the earliest manuscripts that we are aware of are copies of originals and have undergone several translations, additions, and omissions that eventually culminated into the
Textual criticism. We have more. And in other places.
KJV Bible we know and read today.
Not a KJV onlyist.
CHANGES - Goliaths height in 1 Samuel 17:4 is 6 cubits and a span which is 9ft 9inches but the much older Dead Sea scrolls and Septuagint say he was 4 cubits and a span which is 6ft 9inches. It is suggested that they inflated the height to make David’s achievement seem even more impressive.
The story of the woman taken in adultery, found in John 7:53-8:11, is not present in the earliest and most reliable manuscripts of the Gospel of John, such as Papyrus 66 and Papyrus 75. It is also absent from Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, two of the oldest complete copies of the New Testament.This passage is considered a later addition to the text, as it does not appear in early manuscript evidence and exhibits linguistic differences from the rest of John's Gospel.
The prayer of forgiveness by Jesus on the cross, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do," is present in Codex Sinaiticus but absent from Papyrus 75. Codex Sinaiticus, a 4th-century manuscript, includes this verse in Luke 23:34a, whereas Papyrus 75, an earlier manuscript from the late 2nd or early 3rd century, does not contain it.This omission in Papyrus 75 has led to debates among scholars regarding the originality of the verse in Luke's Gospel.
P64 doesn’t include “without a cause” in Matt 5:22 KJV (That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment). It was the codex sinaiticus where a scribe scribbled it in on the margins which eventually found its way in the KJV verse.
Addition of the trinity in 1 John 5:7-8. The earliest Greek manuscripts have no such thing only the latin ones do which came earlier.
The ending of the Gospel of Mark, specifically verses 16:9-20, is widely considered by scholars to be a later addition and not part of the original text. The earliest and most reliable Greek manuscripts (Codex Vanaticus & Sinaiticus) end at verse 8, with subsequent verses appearing in later manuscripts. These additional verses include post-resurrection appearances of Jesus, and things saying they will survive snake bites and be able to drink poison, and instructions to the disciples, which align with other Gospel accounts but differ stylistically from the rest of Mark.
ENITRE BOOKS THAT WERE OMITTED
Several books mentioned in the Dead Sea scrolls and older manuscripts were omitted Gnostic monks were deemed heretical along with their books Book of Noah Book of Enoch Book of Giants Letter of Jeremiah Book of Tobit Wisdom of Sirach Gospel of Thomas Gospel of Judas
I'm there.. hey.. I want more of that shit. But if you try and look it up, it doesn't wanna cough it up, eh. So you gotta keep kicking it in the ass. So I'd start out by pasting that. Not gonna paste what it would say when it's working on things. You can tell by what I say what was going on. Let's just do a series of me kicking it in the ass so it 'll cough it up with more of these.
We had this right side "deep research" panel too, going on.. but it's trying to do this bullshit school essay, where I'm like, quit fuckin around and let's get a long list. Finally it gets the point after it stalled out for too long and it shut down that right side bullshit.
==============================
Do a "deep research" about all types of things like this, where, you see online, religious fanatics who like to quote bible verse numbers and know every line by memory. Meanwhile, guys were editing these books as it went along. I want a full list of how things seem sketchy with these bibles, these days. If your list is long, do not cut things short.. that's why this is a deep research, I want a full long scrolling list. Not your usual brief few points and you wrap 'er up.
All this stuff, you can't just go edit things later, you know what I mean. I picture later in the future as society changes and odd things that were illegal in the past are now, permitted.. they'll go and change this bible stuff later. It's almost like a fucking sitcom, where now they'll go.. oh we gotta add a gay dude here and there, who sins. Or.. too many white people, better throw in some black guys. Even though they probably weren't around that biblical area back then. It's like these guys are fuckin with the past history.
So, in your full list of biblical edits later, as the years go on.. I want you to list each edit, and explain the "why", they'd have to change something later. What's the real reason for that edit.
==========================
You are nearing your limit of 10 research reports. You can generate 1 more until Oct 9.
=========================
You call this a fucking list? At least the initial post from the other guy had a bit of a list of edits. Scrolling your shit.. I don't see none of that. What the fuck are you doing? Give me a fucking super long scrolling list of edits like he found out about.
===========================
You're supposed to go find a bunch of new ones. He was talking about major edits too. Did you even fucking read what he said in the start of my query.
===========================
you're supposed to go find new things he didn't talk about in his post I quoted at the start. Seems like you're dwelling on what he said.
=======================
you still can't figure out a list, eh.. like nevermind your fuckin school essay.. give me a long scrolling list of all biblical "edits" as time goes on. What year those edits would go. Do not do a "dissertation" where you do school mumbo jumbo. Just name the edit, what year, and the reason why. Don't use a table, because I can't copy that. It has to be like normal notepad text. Posting this in a forum and they don't do tables. ok.. nevermind your fucking office hot air. Stick to the edits only.
========================
yeah, nevermind the right side bullshit.. keep going in this left side. I already got the ones he talked about, so don't repeat them. There's gotta be more. This isn't long scrolling enough.
===========================
I don't see you talking about what year the original came out, and what year the edit was. Do that for each point. Don't talk about anything the guy mentioned in his post I quoted at the start. Go find new edits he didn't mention, and biblical books that were omitted too.. like he had at the bottom. So add those at the bottom of your post. Try the whole thing again from scratch. Super long scrolling list. Stop limiting yourself to just a few points. Why do you keep doing that. Trying to save data transfer or something?
==========================
how come your biblical edits, you only got 2-3 now? this is supposed to be a super long scrolling list
=========================
like I want at least 100 points here.. don't repeat what he said at the start.
========================
how many edit points do you have in your last response, don't count the omitted books.. those look ok
=======================
that's all you could scrub up, was 24? I said at least 100.. ok.. quit limiting your response because you're trying to save data transfer amount or something.
=======================
how many points that time? You need to say the amount of edits at the start, then get into it. I need this vastly increased.. before you had 24, scrolling there, it looked similar, "not enough". Try the whole thing again.
=======================
Nevermind the right side deep research side. That was causing you to do the spinning circle for a couple hours. I had enough clicked stop, waited 5 minutes, that did nothing, so reloaded this chrome browser and now it's back to normal. I don't see the right side deep research panel.. it's just the left side expanded with the whole screen.
You were doing ok though.. finally got it with a longer list and were processing 121 edit points instead of the few you usually do. That's what I want, a super long list, of all the edits they did to the bible, over the years. If you have more than 121, make a bigger list. Don't do the right side though because it's taking too much of your processing power. Just have it on the left side like you were doing.
I want a new parameter here.. where you'll sort the edits by "edit date", so begin with the earliest ones. The original dates would stay the same. This way you get an idea of what they edited first. Before you begin, can you find more than 121 edits?
=============================
What's the specific number here of how many edits of your previous response? You just say over 100. Like how many can you get, that are out there?
=========================
So that's all you can get is 121 edits? If you can get more, get more, ok? Almost done. Here's a change in the style of your reponses. I want you to add a "number" to each one, so I can make sure you cover all 121. Like I said.. if there's more edits you can find, get them. Try again but number each one. I was going through what you said in your previous response and not much info for edit dates on some of them. Not sure how you'll sort all these. Because it's like, which one would be the first, right. Categorize them by which show up earlier in the bible sequence. Like 121 would be edits that went on in the end section of the bible. ok try the whole thing again. This should be the last change going on before you're done.
==========================
oh you only got 49 edits to the bible.. When you get into the later section, of omitted or lost books, that should reset the number to 1 for that section.
So that's all you could find was 49 edits to the bible? See if you can get way more, ok. This list isn't long enough and you know there's more edits you can research and find, but you're being too "lazy". Don't fuckin be "lazy", ok. This is supposed to do a "deep research", so do your fucking job correctly.
================================
Oh, so now you got off your lazy ass and the edits you could find were 74.. before I kicked you in the ass, you could only find 49. I got a hunch you're still being lazy, aren't you. This is supposed to be a deep research, ok.. jeez. ok.. so if there's more than 74, quit fuckin around and add them, ok.
Almost there.. I want an addition to what's going on with the omitted or lost books. For each, you'll give a paragraph of what's going on in it. Like what's that book about. So, each of those needs to be expanded more about what was going on. I don't want just one sentence. A paragraph, might not be enough. I want to know what was going on in those omitted or lost books, where they were like.. naw, we don't wanna go there with that. It's cause there's some "funny business", where, if they'd add it to the bible, it'd be like, what's going on with this. And they didn't wanna go there. So you need to talk about what was going on in there, with each of those omitted or lost books.
==============================
Checking your 74 edits, I shouldn't be seeing scattered section names, wherever. Your 74 points are supposed to be sorted in the sequence they first show up in the bible, ok.
It's almost like you're a retarded kid, in school.. where, the only way to deal with them is to hit 'em. Organize this section properly.
Gemini is a dribbling moron, but yet you trust it with FACTS? Especially info about the Bible?? Wow. Make it make sense, I beg of you. :( :(
These omitted or lost books, section, I want you to add a 3rd point for each, of what year it was created.
I'm also fuckin leery about your lazy ass, the way you were trying to sneak things behind my back going oh yeah there's 121 edits. Then I get you to number shit and find out you were counting omitted books in that number. Your edit count was way low.. Then I keep whipping you, and all of a sudden you pull out this 74, out of your ass, from nowhere. You were hiding that, all the time. I know there's more but you're too fuckin lazy to do your job properly. This is supposed to be a "deep research", ok. Yet you keep doing shit, half-assed. If you were an employee, you'd be "fired", ok. Go fucking get more edits that you know about, but are too lazy to do your job properly, and go get the full fucking list. It's like you're trying to save "processing power" or something. This is a fucking "deep research" ok.. not a coasting it hopeing the boss won't notice.