He is a socialist the same way H.G. Wells, Bertrand Russel, Rockefeller and the international banking elite are socialists. Not all socialists are commies. It's called fabianism and they seek to bring about the NWO which is a socialist corporate technocracy (more like a synthesis between socialism and monopoly capitalism where the border between private and public has been transcended).

If everything is owned and ran by a private corporation like Blackrock or the Fed, what's the difference between this and a socialist authoritarian government? This is where the libertarian brain melts. If they bite the bullet they have to admit they believe "government bad, Blackrock good".

He is a socialist the same way H.G. Wells, Bertrand Russel, Rockefeller and the international banking elite are socialists. Not all socialists are commies. It's called fabianism and they seek to bring about the NWO which is a socialist corporate technocracy (more like a synthesis between socialism and monopoly capitalism where the border between private and public has been transcended).

If everything is owned and ran by a private corporation like Blackrock or the Fed, what's the difference between this and a socialist authoritarian government?

He is a socialist the same way H.G. Wells, Bertrand Russel, Rockefeller and the international banking elite are socialists. Not all socialists are commies. It's called fabianism and they seek to bring about the NWO which is a socialist corporate technocracy (more like a synthesis between socialism and monopoly capitalism where the border between private and public has been transcended).

He is a socialist the same way H.G. Wells, Bertrand Russel, Rockefeller and the international banking elite were socialists. Not all socialists are commies. It's called fabianism and they seek to bring about the NWO which is a socialist corporate technocracy (more like a synthesis between socialism and monopoly capitalism where the border between private and public has been transcended).