Yes, there is a difference but I'd argue it's not a meaningful one when looking at the core values. Trump can't be a nationalist and na AIPAC zionist at the same time. If we go off on what his platform is he has advantage over the dems, but politicians lie and there's no good reason to trust him.
Slightly off topic, but: I caution you to avoid the term "Muslim Loving" as this falls into the same propaganda narrative as "Pro HAMAS"- labeling opposition to Israeli-Genocide as negative. Honestly, are Muslims even bad? Maybe? Or is it merely the fomented hatred that Israeli has generated between Muslims and the West that we are attributing to Islam? As the USA acts on behalf of Israeli to destroy Islamic nations why would they not hate us? I guess my question is:
If there were no Israel, and the USA did not act on behalf of Israel, would we even be talking about Islam?
Promotion of Islam and mass migration are part of a bigger plan that's not strictly tied to the zionist state and goes way beyond HAMAS or the current conflict. It's the NWO agenda to destroy traditional western society, family and culture. In this sense tptb use Islam as a useful chess piece to achieve their goals. Moreover Islam has always been a religion of conquest and Europe has a long history fighting off muslim and arab invasions. They weaponize eastern religions like Hinduism for cultural subversion purposes too, but Hinduism is not a religion of conquest so its use is limited (a soft power approach).
And finally, as a Christian I consider Islam as a blasphemous anti-christian religion - it's just as bad as talmudic judaism despite of the propaganda effort trying to convince Christians otherwise (again, this has been going for at least 60 years and it's well documented that jews are behind the islamization of the west). They love creating such false dialectics: "If you're against the jews, then you support the muslims" and vice versa. In reality both are enemies to the western (and eastern) Christian civilization and that's been proven time and time again.
PS: If you're interested in the plan for islamization I recommend this great book by geopolitical researcher Ioan Ratiu (there's a chapter on this): https://ia801609.us.archive.org/27/items/themilnerfabianconspiracy-ioanratiuoldscan-230418134425-46dcb70b/themilnerfabianconspiracy-ioanratiuoldscan-230418134425-46dcb70b.pdf
Yes, there is a difference but I'd argue it's not a meaningful one when looking at the core values. Trump can't be a nationalist and na AIPAC zionist at the same time. If we go off on what his platform is he has advantage over the dems, but politicians lie and there's no good reason to trust him.
Slightly off topic, but: I caution you to avoid the term "Muslim Loving" as this falls into the same propaganda narrative as "Pro HAMAS"- labeling opposition to Israeli-Genocide as negative. Honestly, are Muslims even bad? Maybe? Or is it merely the fomented hatred that Israeli has generated between Muslims and the West that we are attributing to Islam? As the USA acts on behalf of Israeli to destroy Islamic nations why would they not hate us? I guess my question is:
If there were no Israel, and the USA did not act on behalf of Israel, would we even be talking about Islam?
Promotion of Islam and mass migration are part of a bigger plan that's not strictly tied to the zionist state and goes way beyond HAMAS or the current conflict. It's the NWO agenda to destroy traditional western society, family and culture. In this sense tptb use Islam as a useful chess piece to achieve their goals. Moreover Islam has always been a religion of conquest and Europe has a long history fighting off muslim and arab invasions. They weaponize eastern religions like Hinduism for cultural subversion purposes too, but Hinduism is not a religion of conquest so its use is limited (a soft power approach).
And finally, as a Christian I consider Islam as a blasphemous anti-christian religion - it's just as bad as talmudic judaism despite of the propaganda effort trying to convince Christians otherwise (again, this has been going for at least 60 years and it's well documented that jews are behind the islamization of the west). They love creating such false dialectics: "If you're against the jews, then you support the muslims" and vice versa. In reality both are enemies to the western (and eastern) Christian civilization and that's been proven time and time again.
PS: If you're interested in the plan for islamization I recommend this great book by Ioan Ratiu (there's a chapter on this): https://ia801609.us.archive.org/27/items/themilnerfabianconspiracy-ioanratiuoldscan-230418134425-46dcb70b/themilnerfabianconspiracy-ioanratiuoldscan-230418134425-46dcb70b.pdf
Yes, there is a difference but I'd argue it's not a meaningful one when looking at the core values. Trump can't be a nationalist and na AIPAC zionist at the same time. If we go off on what his platform is he has advantage over the dems, but politicians lie and there's no good reason to trust him.
Slightly off topic, but: I caution you to avoid the term "Muslim Loving" as this falls into the same propaganda narrative as "Pro HAMAS"- labeling opposition to Israeli-Genocide as negative. Honestly, are Muslims even bad? Maybe? Or is it merely the fomented hatred that Israeli has generated between Muslims and the West that we are attributing to Islam? As the USA acts on behalf of Israeli to destroy Islamic nations why would they not hate us? I guess my question is:
If there were no Israel, and the USA did not act on behalf of Israel, would we even be talking about Islam?
Promotion of Islam and mass migration are part of a bigger plan that's not strictly tied to the zionist state and goes way beyond HAMAS or the current conflict. It's the NWO agenda to destroy traditional western society, family and culture. In this sense tptb use Islam as a useful chess piece to achieve their goals. Moreover Islam has always been a religion of conquest and Europe has a long history fighting off muslim and arab invasions. They weaponize eastern religions like Hinduism for cultural subversion purposes too, but Hinduism is not a religion of conquest so its use is limited (a soft power approach).
And finally, as a Christian I consider Islam as a blasphemous anti-christian religion - it's just as bad as talmudic judaism despite of the propaganda effort trying to convince Christians otherwise (again, this has been going for at least 60 years and it's well documented that jews are behind the islamization of the west). They love creating such false dialectics: "If you're against the jews, then you support the muslims" and vice versa. In reality both are enemies to the western (and eastern) Christian civilization and that's been proven time and time again.
Yes, there is a difference but I'd argue it's not a meaningful one when looking at the core values. Trump can't be a nationalist and na AIPAC zionist at the same time. If we go off on what his platform is he has advantage over the dems, but politicians lie and there's no good reason to trust him.
Slightly off topic, but: I caution you to avoid the term "Muslim Loving" as this falls into the same propaganda narrative as "Pro HAMAS"- labeling opposition to Israeli-Genocide as negative. Honestly, are Muslims even bad? Maybe? Or is it merely the fomented hatred that Israeli has generated between Muslims and the West that we are attributing to Islam? As the USA acts on behalf of Israeli to destroy Islamic nations why would they not hate us? I guess my question is:
If there were no Israel, and the USA did not act on behalf of Israel, would we even be talking about Islam?
Promotion of Islam and mass migration are part of a bigger plan that's not strictly tied to the zionist state. It's the NWO agenda to destroy traditional western society, family and culture. In this sense tptb use Islam as a useful chess piece to achieve their goals. Moreover Islam has always been a religion of conquest and Europe has a long history fighting off muslim and arab invasions. They weaponize eastern religions like Hinduism for cultural subversion purposes too, but Hinduism is not a religion of conquest so its use is limited (a soft power approach).
And finally, as a Christian I consider Islam as a blasphemous anti-christian religion - it's just as bad as talmudic judaism despite of the propaganda effort trying to convince Christians otherwise (again, this has been going for at least 60 years and it's well documented that jews are behind the islamization of the west). They love creating such false dialectics: "If you're against the jews, then you support the muslims" and vice versa. In reality both are enemies to the western (and eastern) Christian civilization and that's been proven time and time again.
Yes, there is a difference but I'd argue it's not a meaningful one when looking at the core values. Trump can't be a nationalist and na AIPAC zionist at the same time. If we go off on what his platform is he has advantage over the dems, but politicians lie and there's no good reason to trust him.
Slightly off topic, but: I caution you to avoid the term "Muslim Loving" as this falls into the same propaganda narrative as "Pro HAMAS"- labeling opposition to Israeli-Genocide as negative. Honestly, are Muslims even bad? Maybe? Or is it merely the fomented hatred that Israeli has generated between Muslims and the West that we are attributing to Islam? As the USA acts on behalf of Israeli to destroy Islamic nations why would they not hate us? I guess my question is:
If there were no Israel, and the USA did not act on behalf of Israel, would we even be talking about Islam?
Promotion of Islam and mass migration are part of a bigger plan that's not strictly tied to the zionist state. It's the NWO agenda to destroy traditional western society, family and culture. In this sense tptb use Islam as a useful chess piece to achieve their goals. Moreover Islam has always been a religion of conquest and Europe has a long history fighting off muslim and arab invasions. They weaponize eastern religions like Hinduism for cultural subversion purposes too, but Hinduism is not a religion of conquest so its use is limited (a soft power approach).
And finally, as a Christian I consider Islam as a blasphemous anti-christian religion - it's just as bad as talmudic judaism despite of the propaganda effort trying to convince Christians otherwise (again, this has been going for at least 60 years and it's well documented that jews are behind the islamization of the west). They love creating such false dialectics: "If you're against the jews, then you support the muslims" and vice versa. In reality both are enemies to the western (and eastern) Christian civilization.
Yes, there is a difference but I'd argue it's not a meaningful one when looking at the core values. Trump can't be a nationalist and na AIPAC zionist at the same time. If we go off on what his platform is he has advantage over the dems, but politicians lie and there's no good reason to trust him.
Slightly off topic, but: I caution you to avoid the term "Muslim Loving" as this falls into the same propaganda narrative as "Pro HAMAS"- labeling opposition to Israeli-Genocide as negative. Honestly, are Muslims even bad? Maybe? Or is it merely the fomented hatred that Israeli has generated between Muslims and the West that we are attributing to Islam? As the USA acts on behalf of Israeli to destroy Islamic nations why would they not hate us? I guess my question is:
If there were no Israel, and the USA did not act on behalf of Israel, would we even be talking about Islam?
Promotion of Islam and mass migration are part of a bigger plan that's not strictly tied to the zionist state. It's the NWO agenda to destroy traditional western society, family and culture. In this sense tptb use Islam as a useful chess piece to achieve their goals. Moreover Islam has always been a religion of conquest and Europe has a long history fighting off muslim and arab invasions. They weaponize eastern religions like Hinduism for cultural subversion purposes too, but Hinduism is not a religion of conquest so its use is limited (a soft power approach).
And finally, as a Christian I consider Islam as a blasphemous anti-christian religion - it's just as bad as talmudic judaism despite of the propaganda effort trying to convince Christians otherwise (again, this has been going for at least 60 years and it's well documented that jews are behind the islamization of the west). They love creating such false dialectics: "If you're against the jews, then you're with us, because they are our common enemy". In reality both are enemies to the western (and eastern) Christian civilization.
Yes, there is a difference but I'd argue it's not a meaningful one when looking at the core values. Trump can't be a nationalist and na AIPAC zionist at the same time. If we go off on what his platform is he has advantage over the dems, but politicians lie and there's no good reason to trust him.
Slightly off topic, but: I caution you to avoid the term "Muslim Loving" as this falls into the same propaganda narrative as "Pro HAMAS"- labeling opposition to Israeli-Genocide as negative. Honestly, are Muslims even bad? Maybe? Or is it merely the fomented hatred that Israeli has generated between Muslims and the West that we are attributing to Islam? As the USA acts on behalf of Israeli to destroy Islamic nations why would they not hate us? I guess my question is:
If there were no Israel, and the USA did not act on behalf of Israel, would we even be talking about Islam?
Promotion of Islam and mass migration are part of a bigger plan that's not strictly tied to the zionist state. It's the NWO agenda to destroy traditional western society, family and culture. In this sense tptb use Islam as a useful chess piece to achieve their goals. Moreover Islam has always been a religion of conquest and Europe has a long history fighting off muslim and arab invasions.
And finally, as a Christian I consider Islam as a blasphemous anti-christian religion - it's just as bad as talmudic judaism despite of the propaganda effort trying to convince Christians otherwise (again, this has been going for at least 60 years and it's well documented that jews are behind the islamization of the west). They love creating such false dialectics: "If you're against the jews, then you're with us, because they are our common enemy". In reality both are enemies to the western (and eastern) Christian civilization.