Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Nah, this is Tallest’s argument too and it doesn’t work for me. The main beneficiaries of the moon landing are worldwide governments and endless money laundering, led by ZOG and the U.S. dollar. It’s still a Synagogue operation. The US government was beholden to ZOG long before 1969. The supposed moon landing event also established TeeVee as THE information conduit feeding people goyslop in every home in the world. My argument is it was one of (or THE) main events that established TeeVee as a household staple and is still present worldwide today. People now believe everything their TeeVee tells them and it stems from staged events like the moon landing. These types of worldwide, staged events are no longer (or rarely) needed because TeeVee is everywhere now.

Objectively, the simplest solution is the answer. Is it easier to fake the moon landing in 1969 or to actually go there, land, take pics, return, and have no operational issues whatsoever? Watch the Apollo astronaut interviews after their supposed return to Earth. They are emotionless, uncomfortable, almost captive in their responses. Subsequently, there have been very few astronaut interviews given over the years and even those have conflicting information and responses.

I think most of us who have been around a while agree that white man’s achievements are constantly under attack but I see this as a ZOG operation that hasn’t needed any updates since 1969. If you talk to young people (junior or high schoolers), there is a healthy percentage that question the moon landing because of the internet and the lack of progress made (since 1969…over 50 years!) which highlight more discrepancies now.

May be of interest: https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie/

121 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Nah, this is Tallest’s argument too and it doesn’t work for me. The main beneficiaries of the moon landing are worldwide governments and endless money laundering, led by ZOG and the U.S. dollar. It’s still a Synagogue operation. The US government was beholden to ZOG long before 1969. The supposed moon landing event also established TeeVee as THE information conduit feeding people goyslop in every home in the world. My argument is it was one of (or THE) main events that established TeeVee as a household staple and is still present worldwide today. People now believe everything their TeeVee tells them and it stems from staged events like the moon landing. These types of worldwide, staged events are no longer (or rarely) needed because TeeVee is everywhere now.

Objectively, the simplest solution is the answer. Is it easier to fake the moon landing in 1969 or to actually go there, land, take pics, return, and have no operational issues whatsoever? Watch the Apollo astronaut interviews after their supposed return to Earth. They are emotionless, uncomfortable, almost captive in their responses. Subsequently, there have been very few astronaut interviews given over the years and even those have conflicting information and responses.

I think most of us who have been around a while agree that white man’s achievements are constantly under attack but I see this as a ZOG operation that hasn’t needed any updates since 1969. If you talk to young people (junior or high schoolers), there is a healthy percentage that question the moon landing because of the internet and the lack of progress made (since 1969…over 50 years!) which highlight more discrepancies now.

121 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Nah, this is Tallest’s argument too and it doesn’t work for me. The main beneficiaries of the moon landing are worldwide governments and endless money laundering, led by ZOG and the U.S. dollar. It’s still a Synagogue operation. The US government was beholden to ZOG long before 1969. The supposed moon landing event also established TeeVee as THE information conduit feeding people goyslop in every home in the world. My argument is it was one of (or THE) main events that established TeeVee as a household staple and is still present worldwide today. People now believe everything their TeeVee tells them and it stems from staged events like the moon landing. These types of worldwide, staged events are no longer (or rarely) needed because TeeVee is everywhere now.

Objectively, the simplest solution is the answer. Is it easier to fake the moon landing in 1969 or to actually go there? Watch the Apollo astronaut interviews after their supposed return to Earth. They are emotionless, uncomfortable, almost captive in their responses. Subsequently, there have been very few astronaut interviews given over the years and even those have conflicting information and responses.

I think most of us who have been around a while agree that white man’s achievements are constantly under attack but I see this as a ZOG operation that hasn’t needed any updates since 1969. If you talk to young people (junior or high schoolers), there is a healthy percentage that question the moon landing because of the internet and the lack of progress made (since 1969…over 50 years!) which highlight more discrepancies now.

121 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Nah, this is Tallest’s argument too and it doesn’t work for me. The main beneficiaries of the moon landing are worldwide governments and endless money laundering, led by ZOG and the U.S. dollar. It’s still a Synagogue operation. The US government was beholden to ZOG long before 1969. The supposed event also established TeeVee as THE information conduit feeding people goyslop in every home in the world. My argument is it was one of (or THE) main events that established TeeVee as a household staple and is still present worldwide today. People now believe everything their TeeVee tells them and it stems from staged events like the moon landing. These types of worldwide, staged events are no longer (or rarely) needed because TeeVee is everywhere now.

Objectively, the simplest solution is the answer. Is it easier to fake the moon landing in 1969 or to actually go there? Watch the Apollo astronaut interviews after their supposed return to Earth. They are emotionless, uncomfortable, almost captive in their responses. Subsequently, there have been very few astronaut interviews given over the years and even those have conflicting information and responses.

I think most of us who have been around a while agree that white man’s achievements are constantly under attack but I see this as a ZOG operation that hasn’t needed any updates since 1969. If you talk to young people (junior or high schoolers), there is a healthy percentage that question the moon landing because of the internet and the lack of progress made (since 1969…over 50 years!) which highlight more discrepancies now.

121 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Nah, this is Tallest’s argument too and it doesn’t work for me. The main beneficiaries of the moon landing are worldwide governments and endless money laundering, led by ZOG and the U.S. dollar. It’s still a Synagogue operation. The supposed event also established TeeVee as THE information conduit feeding people goyslop in every home in the world. My argument is it was one of (or THE) main events that established TeeVee as a household staple and is still present worldwide today. People now believe everything their TeeVee tells them and it stems from staged events like the moon landing. These types of worldwide, staged events are no longer (or rarely) needed because TeeVee is everywhere now.

Objectively, the simplest solution is the answer. Is it easier to fake the moon landing in 1969 or to actually go there? Watch the Apollo astronaut interviews after their supposed return to Earth. They are emotionless, uncomfortable, almost captive in their responses. Subsequently, there have been very few astronaut interviews given over the years and even those have conflicting information and responses.

I think most of us who have been around a while agree that white man’s achievements are constantly under attack but I see this as a ZOG operation that hasn’t needed any updates since 1969. If you talk to young people (junior or high schoolers), there is a healthy percentage that question the moon landing because of the internet and the lack of progress made (since 1969…over 50 years!) which highlight more discrepancies now.

121 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Nah, this is Tallest’s argument too and it doesn’t work for me. The main beneficiaries of the moon landing are worldwide governments and endless money laundering, led by ZOG and the U.S. dollar. It’s still a Synagogue operation. The supposed event also established TeeVee as THE information conduit feeding people goyslop in every home in the world. My argument is it was one of (or THE) main events that established TeeVee as a household staple and is still present worldwide today. People now believe everything their TeeVee tells them and it stems from staged events like the moon landing. These types of worldwide, staged events are no longer (or rarely) needed because TeeVee is everywhere now.

Objectively, the simplest solution is the answer. Is it easier to fake the moon landing in 1969 or to actually go there? Watch the Apollo astronaut interviews after their supposed return to Earth. They are emotionless, uncomfortable, almost captive in their responses. Subsequently, there have been very few astronaut interviews given over the years and even those have conflicting information and responses.

I think most of us who have been around a while agree that white man’s achievements are constantly under attack but I see this as a ZOG operation that hasn’t needed any updates since 1969. If you talk to young people (junior or high schoolers), there is a healthy percentage that question the moon landing because of the internet and the lack of progress made (since 1969) highlight more discrepancies now.

121 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Nah, this is Tallest’s argument too and it doesn’t work for me. The main beneficiaries of the moon landing are worldwide governments and endless money laundering, led by ZOG and the U.S. dollar. It’s still a Synagogue operation. The supposed event also established TeeVee as THE information conduit feeding people goyslop in every home in the world. My argument is it was one of (or THE) main events that established TeeVee as a household staple and is still present worldwide today. People now believe everything their TeeVee tells them and it stems from staged events like the moon landing. These types of worldwide, staged events are no longer (or rarely) needed because TeeVee is everywhere now.

Objectively, the simplest solution is the answer. Is it easier to fake the moon landing in 1969 or to actually go there? Watch the Apollo astronaut interviews after their supposed return to Earth. They are emotionless, uncomfortable, almost captive in their responses. Subsequently, there have been very few astronaut interviews given over the years and even those have conflicting information.

I think most of us who have been around a while agree that white man’s achievements are constantly under attack but I see this as a ZOG operation that hasn’t needed any updates since 1969. If you talk to young people (junior or high schoolers), there is a healthy percentage that question the moon landing because of the internet and the lack of progress made (since 1969) highlight more discrepancies now.

121 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Nah, this is Tallest’s argument too and it doesn’t work for me. The main beneficiaries of the moon landing are worldwide governments and endless money laundering, led by ZOG and the U.S. dollar. It’s still a Synagogue operation. The supposed event also established TeeVee as THE information conduit feeding people goyslop in every home in the world. My argument is it was one of (or THE) main event that established TeeVee as a household staple and is still present worldwide today. People now believe everything their TeeVee tells them and it stems from staged events like the moon landing. These types of worldwide, staged events are no longer (or rarely) needed because TeeVee is everywhere now.

Objectively, the simplest solution is the answer. Is it easier to fake the moon landing in 1969 or to actually go there? Watch the Apollo astronaut interviews after their supposed return to Earth. They are emotionless, uncomfortable, almost captive in their responses. Subsequently, there have been very few astronaut interviews given over the years and even those have conflicting information.

I think most of us who have been around a while agree that white man’s achievements are constantly under attack but I see this as a ZOG operation that hasn’t needed any updates since 1969. If you talk to young people (junior or high schoolers), there is a healthy percentage that question the moon landing because of the internet and the lack of progress made (since 1969) highlight more discrepancies now.

121 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Nah, this is Tallest’s argument too and it doesn’t work for me. The main beneficiaries of the moon landing are worldwide governments and endless money laundering, led by ZOG and the U.S. dollar. It’s still a Synagogue operation. The supposed event also established TeeVee as THE information conduit feeding people goyslop in every home in the world. My argument is it was one of (or THE) main event that established TeeVee as a household staple and is still present worldwide today. People now believe everything their TeeVee tells them and it stems from staged events like the moon landing. These types of worldwide, staged events are no longer (or rarely) needed because TeeVee is everywhere now.

Objectively, the simplest solution is the answer. Is it easier to fake the moon landing in 1969 or to actually go there? Watch the Apollo astronaut interviews after their supposed return to Earth. They are emotionless, uncomfortable, almost captive in their responses. Subsequently, there have been very few astronaut interviews given over the years and even those have conflicting information.

I think most of us who have been around a while agree that white man’s achievements are constantly under attack but I see this as a ZOG operation that hasn’t needed any updates since 1969. If you talk to young people (junior or high schoolers), there is a healthy percentage that question the moon landing because the internet and lack of progress since 1969 make it obvious to them.

121 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Nah, this is Tallest’s argument too and it doesn’t work for me. The main beneficiaries of the moon landing are worldwide governments and endless money laundering, led by ZOG and the U.S. dollar. It’s still a Synagogue operation. The supposed event also established TeeVee as THE information conduit feeding people goyslop in every home in the world. My argument is it was one of (or THE) main event that established TeeVee as a household staple and is still present worldwide today. People now believe everything their TeeVee tells them and it stems from staged events like the moon landing. These types of worldwide, staged events are no longer (or rarely) needed because TeeVee is everywhere now.

Objectively, the simplest solution is the answer. Is it easier to fake the moon landing in 1969 or to actually go there? Watch the Apollo astronaut interviews after their supposed return to Earth. They are emotionless, uncomfortable, almost captive in their responses. There are very few interviews given over the years and even those have conflicting information.

I think most of us who have been around a while agree that white man’s achievements are constantly under attack but I see this as a ZOG operation that hasn’t needed any updates since 1969.

121 days ago
1 score