Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Oh. I didn't mean it in jest. At least, not entirely. As I view the only proper sacrifice of an animal, as one made for a meal. Needlessly spilling blood symbolically, and proclaiming it in the name of God is grotesque. I view it as an act against God to kill without cause, and an affront to his creations.

As a sacrifice should always be utilitarian, and not symbolic, and that doing otherwise, is only meant to trick others out of their gains.

I personally view the act of expressing gratitude before or after slaughtering an animal out of reverence for the life taken, as a form religious sacrifice in the strictest sense.

218 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Oh. I didn't mean it in jest. At least, not entirely. As I view the only proper sacrifice of an animal, as one made for a meal. Needlessly spilling blood symbolically, and proclaiming it in the name of God is grotesque. I view it as an act against God to kill without cause, and an affront to his creations.

218 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Oh. I didn't mean it in jest. As I view the only proper sacrifice of an animal, as one made for a meal. Needlessly spilling blood symbolically, and proclaiming it in the name of God is grotesque. I view it as an act against God to kill without cause, and an affront to his creations.

218 days ago
1 score