for images the amount of hidden data is significantly less than the file size

1Mb jpeg with 8,388,608 pixels can hold about 349,525 pixels of secondary image

I know I said "about" and then specific pixel counts but that's what the calculation said.

The state of the art gives an embedding efficiency of 20 so I used that and 1Mb pulled out of thin air just to use as an example

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00500-023-09130-8

for images the amount of hidden data is significantly less than the file size

1Mb jpeg with 8,388,608 pixels can hold about 349,525 pixels of secondary image

(I know I said "about" and then specific pixel counts but that's what the calculation said)

for images the amount of hidden data is significantly less than the file size

1Mb jpeg with 8,388,608 pixels can hold about 349,525 pixels of secondary image

(I know I said "about" and then specific pixel counts but that's what the calculator came said)

for images the amount of hidden data is significantly less than the file size

1Mb jpeg with 8,388,608 pixels can hold about 349,525 pixels of secondary image