AFAIK in Twitter you could create polls.

What if some twitter user with decent amount of followers or with some popular hashtag create a poll with a single question and Yes/No options:

Do you consider WEF a terrorist organisation?

• Yes
• No

Just that, nothing more, without any explanations and other stuff.

It does not matter what the results would be. What matters is openly and clearly throwing out an idea that WEF are terrorist organisation.

You could spend years trying to explain for wide audience that WEF is bad guys, but most will never accept your reasoning, because it is boring to read and you will use wrong language.

Most people minds thorougly adjusted to specific "tags" or "keywords". Even if they don't know what WEF is, don't care or do not agree, that keywords will trigger programmed response in their heads. And every time they will meet abbreviation "WEF", that subconcious association with "terrorism" will automatically pop up.

That poll will be, say, first phase. IDK, may be you have popular twitter account or know somebody who have it, try to do it. It will be perfect if it is some completely unrelated with any politics or conspiracies stuff, just some regular peasant account. Just a peasant ask a random question.

Poll is chosen because it is theoretically completely innocent, poll poster want to know opinion of others, not expressing something, so, theoretically, it will be very complex for them to find a reason for themselves to ban that poll, especially if results will be "in favor" to WEF. But for us, as I said, results does not matter.

May be put similar question on something like quora or something like that. Again, it does not matter what answers will be given, main goal is maximum audience coverage of question itself.

Second phase - all we need is to place "WEF" and "terrorist organisation" together at any occasion. It should not be pushed too hard, but every time you mention "WEF" in some public posts add "terrorists" or "terrorist organisation". Early or later that should began to spread, even through dumb virtue signallers who will remember that some three letters are "terrorists" so they should virtue signal on that three letters.

The idea is to use their programming, their language and their kind of tactic against them.

IMF, WHO and others could be treated in similar way.

Is it a stupid idea or there is something that could really work out in existing social networks swamp?

AFAIK in Twitter you could create polls.

What if some twitter user with decent amount of followers or with some popular hashtag create a poll with a single question and Yes/No options:

Do you consider WEF a terrorist organisation? -Yes -No

Just that, nothing more, without any explanations and other stuff.

It does not matter what the results would be. What matters is openly and clearly throwing out an idea that WEF are terrorist organisation.

You could spend years trying to explain for wide audience that WEF is bad guys, but most will never accept your reasoning, because it is boring to read and you will use wrong language.

Most people minds thorougly adjusted to specific "tags" or "keywords". Even if they don't know what WEF is, don't care or do not agree, that keywords will trigger programmed response in their heads. And every time they will meet abbreviation "WEF", that subconcious association with "terrorism" will automatically pop up.

That poll will be, say, first phase. IDK, may be you have popular twitter account or know somebody who have it, try to do it. It will be perfect if it is some completely unrelated with any politics or conspiracies stuff, just some regular peasant account. Just a peasant ask a random question.

Poll is chosen because it is theoretically completely innocent, poll poster want to know opinion of others, not expressing something, so, theoretically, it will be very complex for them to find a reason for themselves to ban that poll, especially if results will be "in favor" to WEF. But for us, as I said, results does not matter.

May be put similar question on something like quora or something like that. Again, it does not matter what answers will be given, main goal is maximum audience coverage of question itself.

Second phase - all we need is to place "WEF" and "terrorist organisation" together at any occasion. It should not be pushed too hard, but every time you mention "WEF" in some public posts add "terrorists" or "terrorist organisation". Early or later that should began to spread, even through dumb virtue signallers who will remember that some three letters are "terrorists" so they should virtue signal on that three letters.

The idea is to use their programming, their language and their kind of tactic against them.

IMF, WHO and others could be treated in similar way.

Is it a stupid idea or there is something that could really work out in existing social networks swamp?