I don’t have a lot of time to address everything. The “arch” designation is very important however as wether or not it is a description of a type of angel or a descriptive title is the crux of the study I linked. Jesus obviously didn’t choose to plainly state the truth of the matter, it’s not really critical information from a salvational standpoint, but enough info is given in the text for us to understand what’s happening. God reveals information through study of His word. Veith shows through scripture how descriptions of Michael are only elsewhere used for Christ in this lecture. Additionally, the fact that none of the other angels accept praise isn’t a strong argument as we don’t have any instance of Michael making an appearance in front of men to compare. All we can glean from that point is that regular angels are fellow servants and we aren’t to worship them and they are different from Michael as they lack the title of leader. As unfallen beings, they are so glorious to behold that men who saw them were compelled to worship them. This info however can’t be bridged to Michael as they don’t have the archangel signifier and they aren’t described the same as Christ.

I don’t have a lot of time to address everything. The “arch” designation is very important however as wether or not it is a description of a type of angel or a descriptive title is the crux of the study I linked.