Your last comment agrees with me. You don't understand what you're working with, and you're not listening to me explain in detail the same thing. You're in what I call Jesus freak mode where everything is evil.
Zeus not equal TO US. When you examine ancient manuscripts you have to use the standards of that time, or you're imposing your values rather than learning theirs. Your opinion is wrong. If you don't like being wrong, stop being wrong.
I down vote you because you're wrong. I go out of my way to define, and cite so that you can read all of it not just what I think is important. You added some text in an edit that is giving you the same information I've been giving you. I don't even need any links to click.
You picked ancient history, ancient manuscripts, and the Bible. I love this topic! 'The Genesis 6 Conspiracy " by Gary Wayne was one of my favorite reads even if I didn't agree 100% because I had already read most of that books bibliagraphy.
Nimrod, also spelled Nemrod, legendary biblical figure of the book of Genesis. Nimrod is described in Genesis 10:8–12 as “the first on earth to be a mighty man. He was a mighty hunter before the Lord.”
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Nimrod
You could be citing known pseudo Dionysius for all I know.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Pseudo-Dionysius-the-Areopagite
While I'm far from perfect, and I still learn all the time you're not going over new material. Unless you're Manly P. Hall, or Dr. JPF with massive amounts of written material it is not appropriate to cite yourself. You haven't proved your point, you're going in circles.
You should also real Ralph Ellis. Michael Tsarion and especially the following book by Marie D. Jones
The book of revelation is astrotheology. You don't seem ready to learn from Dan Winter.
Your last comment agrees with me. You don't understand what you're working with, and you're not listening to me explain in detail the same thing. You're in what I call Jesus freak mode where everything is evil.
Zeus not equal TO US. When you examine ancient manuscripts you have to use the standards of that time, or you're imposing your values rather than learning theirs. Your opinion is wrong. If you don't like being wrong, stop being wrong.
I down vote you because you're wrong. I go out of my way to define, and cite so that you can read all of it not just what I think is important. You added some text in an edit that is giving you the same information I've been giving you. I don't even need any links to click.
You picked ancient history, ancient manuscripts, and the Bible. I love this topic! 'The Genesis 6 Conspiracy " by Gary Wayne was one of my favorite reads even if I didn't agree 100% because I had already read most of that books bibliagraphy.
Nimrod, also spelled Nemrod, legendary biblical figure of the book of Genesis. Nimrod is described in Genesis 10:8–12 as “the first on earth to be a mighty man. He was a mighty hunter before the Lord.”
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Nimrod
You could be citing known pseudo Dionysius for all I know.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Pseudo-Dionysius-the-Areopagite
While I'm far from perfect, and I still learn all the time you're not going over new material. Unless you're Manly P. Hall, or Dr. JPF with massive amounts of written material it is not appropriate to cite yourself. You haven't proved your point, you're going in circles.
You should also real Ralph Ellis. Michael Tsarion and especially the following book by Marie D. Jones
The book of revelation is astrotheology.