Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I want to discuss it here.

I don’t think that is true. I think you want to “ask” disingenuous “questions” for rhetorical purpose only and have no genuine interest in discussing or understanding the existing answers to them. If I am wrong, then what do you care where the discussion occurs?

Are you just promoting your shitty website here

Lol, it’s a community on THIS site specifically for conversations like this. You can browse the existing conversations (this topic has been discussed many times, and all the answers to your questions are already there), or create a new one.

The benefit is that there are other earnest researchers who - now and in the future - may be interested in seeing and/or contributing their perspectives to your question(s).

Either provide arguments or shut up.

Lol. Arguments are for fools. Rational discourse and rigorous research are, instead, for the learned.

I have no arguments, only my research (which includes answers to your questions).

The answer to your latest question is weight. Understanding that answer will take further discussion, which is better served on a forum specifically for such discussions (i.e. flatearthresearch).

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I want to discuss it here.

I don’t think that is true. I think you want to “ask” disingenuous “questions” for rhetorical purpose only and have no genuine interest in discussing or understanding the existing answers to them. If I am wrong, then what do you care where the discussion occurs?

Are you just promoting your shitty website here

Lol, it’s a community on THIS site specifically for conversations like this. You can browse the existing conversations (this topic has been discussed many times, and all the answers to your questions are already there), or create a new one.

The benefit is that there are other earnest researchers who - now and in the future - may be interested in seeing and/or contributing their perspectives to your question(s).

Either provide arguments or shut up.

Lol. Arguments are for fools. Rational discourse and rigorous research are, instead, for the learned.

I have no arguments, only my research (which includes answers to your questions).

The answer to your latest question is weight. Understanding the answer will take further discussion, which is better served on a forum specifically for such discussions (i.e. flatearthresearch).

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I want to discuss it here.

I don’t think that is true. I think you want to “ask” disingenuous “questions” for rhetorical purpose only and have no genuine interest in discussing them or understanding the existing answers to them. If I am wrong, then what do you care where the discussion occurs?

Are you just promoting your shitty website here

Lol, it’s a community on THIS site specifically for conversations like this. You can browse the existing conversations (this topic has been discussed many times, and all the answers to your questions are already there), or create a new one.

The benefit is that there are other earnest researchers who - now and in the future - may be interested in seeing and/or contributing their perspectives to your question(s).

Either provide arguments or shut up.

Lol. Arguments are for fools. Rational discourse and rigorous research are, instead, for the learned.

I have no arguments, only my research (which includes answers to your questions).

The answer to your latest question is weight. Understanding the answer will take further discussion, which is better served on a forum specifically for such discussions (i.e. flatearthresearch).

1 year ago
1 score