Lol.
In the case of an emergency, they prefer the buildings didnt fall down at all while people are still inside.
Anyway, have there been any other incidences like this? Are buildings really designed that way?
https://www.bestonlineengineeringdegree.com/the-10-worst-high-rise-building-collapses-in-history/
9/11 is #1. Look at the rest.... they dont just fall into neat little piles. They half fall apart, or tip over, or in one case it did pancake but it took 10 seconds for 7 floors in the case where they removed supports before the concrete had fully cured.
Op's picture is proof they didnt skip out on supports. The entire thing was built to prevent what happened.
In the case of 1 WTC, it took about 12 seconds to reduce the tower to rubble.
There is no way this could happen without explosives being rigged in the building. And the biggest MATTER OF FACT debunk that is used, is when they would have put explosives in the building?
In the 9 months before 9/11, there was a massive elevator renovations project involving the towers' 15 miles of elevator hoistways.
That would have been the time to do it, while this was common knowledge in 2001, seems most people think this is fake now.
Also op is right about one thing. Buddy saved alot of money when those towers come down, because a recent report had recommended they be decommissioned, mainly because of the asbestos if I remember right.
Not only did he not pay for the destruction, he got a massive insurance payout for it.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/wtc-terrorism-insurance/
This is just fucking hilarious..
while "technically" true........
https://levinlaw.com/news/asbestos-towers
Was going to cost well over a billion to remove the asbestos from the towers. Lucky larry silverstein.
According to some estimates, the Twin Towers contained 5000 tons of asbestos materials. As long ago as the mid-1990s, the New York Port Authority was looking at an asbestos abatement bill of as much as $1 billion dollars – representing well over 12 times the buildings' original cost. When the buildings' insurers, Affiliated FM, refused to cover the asbestos removal/abatement costs and won their subsequent lawsuit over the the matter, the Port Authority was left with some untenable choices. The outdated buildings could not be demolished because of the asbestos; for the same reason, they could not be remodeled and updated in any cost-effective manner. The only other option was to slowly dismantle the Towers a piece at a time – the cost of which would have run into several billions of dollars.
Convenient. Even got a bunch of free first responders killed for removing the rubble for him. Poor bastards are still fighting for government care which, you know they should have gotten decades ago.
Lol.
In the case of an emergency, they prefer the buildings didnt fall down at all while people are still inside.
Anyway, have there been any other incidences like this? Are buildings really designed that way?
https://www.bestonlineengineeringdegree.com/the-10-worst-high-rise-building-collapses-in-history/
9/11 is #1. Look at the rest.... they dont just fall into neat little piles. They half fall apart, or tip over, or in one case it did pancake but it took 10 seconds for 7 floors in the case where they removed supports before the concrete had fully cured.
Op's picture is proof they didnt skip out on supports. The entire thing was built to prevent what happened.
In the case of 1 WTC, it took about 12 seconds to reduce the tower to rubble.
There is no way this could happen without explosives being rigged in the building. And the biggest MATTER OF FACT debunk that is used, is when they would have put explosives in the building?
In the 9 months before 9/11, there was a massive elevator renovations project involving the towers' 15 miles of elevator hoistways.
That would have been the time to do it, while this was common knowledge in 2001, seems most people think this is fake now.
Also op is right about one thing. Buddy saved alot of money when those towers come down, because a recent report had recommended they be decommissioned, mainly because of the asbestos if I remember right.
Not only did he not pay for the destruction, he got a massive insurance payout for it.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/wtc-terrorism-insurance/
This is just fucking hilarious..
while "technically" true........
https://levinlaw.com/news/asbestos-towers
Was going to cost well over a billion to remove the asbestos from the towers. Lucky larry silverstein.
Lol.
In the case of an emergency, they prefer the buildings didnt fall down at all while people are still inside.
Anyway, have there been any other incidences like this? Are buildings really designed that way?
https://www.bestonlineengineeringdegree.com/the-10-worst-high-rise-building-collapses-in-history/
9/11 is #1. Look at the rest.... they dont just fall into neat little piles. They half fall apart, or tip over, or in one case it did pancake but it took 10 seconds for 7 floors in the case where they removed supports before the concrete had fully cured.
Op's picture is proof they didnt skip out on supports. The entire thing was built to prevent what happened.
In the case of 1 WTC, it took about 12 seconds to reduce the tower to rubble.
There is no way this could happen without explosives being rigged in the building. And the biggest MATTER OF FACT debunk that is used, is when they would have put explosives in the building?
In the 9 months before 9/11, there was a massive elevator renovations project involving the towers' 15 miles of elevator hoistways.
That would have been the time to do it, while this was common knowledge in 2001, seems most people think this is fake now.
Also op is right about one thing. Buddy saved alot of money when those towers come down, because a recent report had recommended they be decommissioned, mainly because of the asbestos if I remember right.
Not only did he not pay for the destruction, he got a massive insurance payout for it.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/wtc-terrorism-insurance/
This is just fucking hilarious..
while not "technically" true........
https://levinlaw.com/news/asbestos-towers
Was going to cost well over a billion to remove the asbestos from the towers. Lucky larry silverstein.
Lol.
In the case of an emergency, they prefer the buildings didnt fall down at all while people are still inside.
Anyway, have there been any other incidences like this? Are buildings really designed that way?
https://www.bestonlineengineeringdegree.com/the-10-worst-high-rise-building-collapses-in-history/
9/11 is #1. Look at the rest.... they dont just fall into neat little piles. They half fall apart, or tip over, or in one case it did pancake but it took 10 seconds for 7 floors in the case where they removed supports before the concrete had fully cured.
Op's picture is proof they didnt skip out on supports. The entire thing was built to prevent what happened.
In the case of 1 WTC, it took about 12 seconds to reduce the tower to rubble.
There is no way this could happen without explosives being rigged in the building. And the biggest MATTER OF FACT debunk that is used, is when they would have put explosives in the building?
In the 9 months before 9/11, there was a massive elevator renovations project involving the towers' 15 miles of elevator hoistways.
That would have been the time to do it, while this was common knowledge in 2001, seems most people think this is fake now.
Also op is right about one thing. Buddy saved alot of money when those towers come down, because a recent report had recommended they be decommissioned, mainly because of the asbestos if I remember right.
Not only did he not pay for the destruction, he got a massive insurance payout for it.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/wtc-terrorism-insurance/
This is just fucking halarious..
while not "technically" true........
Lol.
In the case of an emergency, they prefer the buildings didnt fall down at all while people are still inside.
Anyway, have there been any other incidences like this? Are buildings really designed that way?
https://www.bestonlineengineeringdegree.com/the-10-worst-high-rise-building-collapses-in-history/
9/11 is #1. Look at the rest.... they dont just fall into neat little piles. They half fall apart, or tip over, or in one case it did pancake but it took 10 seconds for 7 floors in the case where they removed supports before the concrete had fully cured.
Op's picture is proof they didnt skip out on supports. The entire thing was built to prevent what happened.
In the case of 1 WTC, it took about 12 seconds to reduce the tower to rubble.
There is no way this could happen without explosives being rigged in the building. And the biggest MATTER OF FACT debunk that is used, is when they would have put explosives in the building?
In the 9 months before 9/11, there was a massive elevator renovations project involving the towers' 15 miles of elevator hoistways.
That would have been the time to do it, while this was common knowledge in 2001, seems most people think this is fake now.