Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Sophisticated? He makes a few insights now and again, but no, he's otherwise obtuse. His quote/response overuse of HTML coding style is impossible to engage with, at least on his terms. He expects you to reply to every question or quibble, and accuses you of being "nonresponsive" if you don't.

Not to mention he's utterly dishonest when "quoting" you, mischaracterizing what you say half the time.

His ability to be ignorant of things outside his wheelhouse, ignoring contrary facts when it doesn't suit his "argument" totally trumps his citing some obscure shit, when half the time he cites some post he made on conpro, as if that is a priori proof of something and not a tautology.

Dude shows all the classic signs of autism expressed in writing.

1 year ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Sophisticated? He makes a few insights now and again, but no, he's otherwise obtuse. His quote/response overuse of HTML coding style is impossible to engage with, at least on his terms. He expects you to reply to every question or quibble, and accuses you of being "nonresponsive" if you don't.

Not to mention he's utterly dishonest for "quoting" you, mischaracterizing what you say half the time.

His ability to be ignorant of things outside his wheelhouse, ignoring contrary facts when it doesn't suit his "argument" totally trumps his citing some obscure shit, when half the time he cites some post he made on conpro, as if that is a priori proof of something and not a tautology.

Dude shows all the classic signs of autism expressed in writing.

1 year ago
3 score
Reason: Original

Sophisticated? He makes a few insights now and again, but no, he's otherwise obtuse. His quote/response overuse of HTML coding style is impossible to engage with, at least on his terms. He expects you to reply to every question or quibble, an accuses you of being "nonresponsive" if you don't.

Not to mention he's utterly dishonest for "quoting" you, mischaracterizing what you say half the time.

His ability to be ignorant of things outside his wheelhouse, ignoring contrary facts when it doesn't suit his "argument" totally trumps his citing some obscure shit, when half the time he cites some post he made on conpro, as if that is a priori proof of something and not a tautology.

Dude shows all the classic signs of autism expressed in writing.

1 year ago
1 score