Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Meanwhile, that's just how science supposed to work. There is a theory, there is observations that does not match the prodictions of theory, then this wrong theory have to be trashed and a new theory have to be developed.

Wrong theories is completely normal thing in science. There was a lot of theories that was proved wrong by observations that contradicted theories predictions. New theories was developed that better match and better explain observations.

Big Bang, Standard Model and all that stuff are not dogmas, it is just a theories. They should be changed to fit new observations or thrown out and replaced with new theories. It is not theories that is the core of science, it is observations and experiments. Theory is just a model of observed universe stated in the language of mathematics. Model could not be more imortant than observations and experiments.

And if some theory is wrong that does not mean that "everything is a lie". Wrong theory is just a bad model of the universe. Disproving some theory does not zero everything we know about the world around us.

The question with theories is why elites created conditions when scientists can't really perform that scientific iterations with theories, disproval, better theories and so on. And when theory become more "important" than observations and experiment results. There are no grants for anything that contradicts theories elites stuck with for whatever reason as "mainstream" at some point of time, presumably around 1970. I think it is an integral part of elites plan to completely stop humanity technological progress.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Meanwhile, that's just how science supposed to work. There is a theory, there is observations that does not match the prodictions of theory, then this wrong theory have to be trashed and a new theory have to be developed.

Wrong theories is completely normal thing in science. There was a lot of theories that was proved wrong by observations that contradicted theories predictions. New theories was developed that better match and better explain observations.

Big Bang, Standard Model and all that stuff are not dogmas, it is just a theories. They should be changed to fit new observations or thrown out and replaced with new theories. It is not theories that is the core of science, it is observations and experiments. Theory is just a model of observed universe stated in the language of mathematics. Model could not be more imortant than observations and experiments.

The question here is why elites created conditions when scientists can't really perform that scientific iterations with theories, disproval, better theories and so on. There are no grants for theories that are different from what elites stuck with for whatever reason as "mainstream" at some point of time, presumably around 1970.

1 year ago
1 score