Isn't the state at fault for issuing the voter cards to felons? How can it go around and charge the felons when it issued the voter cards. Surely any criminal records should have been checked when cards were sent and requested?

It sounds stupid because it is.

How are these cards and the voter records checked, it seems like an archiac system. A system being abused because it above isn't verifying the cards and records prior to sending them. It simply counts them. It seems on the above information huge faults are occurring.

I bet for example there are multiple votes, and out of state votes because any voter cards aren't being verified by a system of dedicated measures. Checking the recipient's records. On sending and then on count.

At times dystopia has a use. It is the social security number cross linked to the relevant citizenship records, criminal, residence, funeral, marital, etc. Surely it should be coded onto the voter card via a qr or whatever code, and linked into the relevant databases for an easy census to take shape, rooting out criminality, preventing a wrong count.

But your link has emphatically proved there are illegal ballots. An inept and archiac system employed. But from the court's view how can it charge, if the voter cards are wrongfully being sent. It seems like the tip of an iceberg.

I think voter cards need to change to a system where you're issued with a chip and pin card. It simply scans it once on ballot, or the card number is inputed when abroad. Lifetime card for illegibility used at every ballot, revoked under illegality.

Isn't the state at fault for issuing the voter cards to felons? How can it go around and charge the felons when it issued the voter cards. Surely any criminal records should have been checked when cards were sent and requested?

It sounds stupid because it is.

How are these cards and the voter records checked, it seems like an archiac system. A system being abused because it above isn't verifying the cards and records prior to sending them. It simply counts them. It seems on the above information huge faults are occurring.

I bet for example there are multiple votes, and out of state votes because any voter cards aren't being verified by a system of dedicated measures. Checking the recipient's records. On sending and then on count.

At times dystopia has a use. It is the social security number cross linked to the relevant citizenship records, criminal, residence, funeral, marital, etc. Surely it should be coded onto the voter card via a qr or whatever code, and linked into the relevant databases for an easy census to take shape, rooting out criminality, preventing a wrong count.

But your link has emphatically proved there are illegal ballots. An inept and archiac system employed. But from the court's view how can it charge, if the voter cards are wrongfully being sent. It seems like the tip of an iceberg.

I think voter cards need to change to a system where you're issued with a chip and pin card. It simply scans it once on ballot, or the card number is inputed when abroad.

Isn't the state at fault for issuing the voter cards to felons? How can it go around and charge the felons when it issued the voter cards. Surely any criminal records should have been checked when cards were sent and requested?

It sounds stupid because it is.

How are these cards and the voter records checked, it seems like an archiac system. A system being abused because it above isn't verifying the cards and records prior to sending them. It simply counts them. It seems on the above information huge faults are occurring.

I bet for example there are multiple votes, and out of state votes because any voter cards aren't being verified by a system of dedicated measures. Checking the recipient's records. On sending and then on count.

At times dystopia has a use. It is the social security number cross linked to the relevant citizenship records, criminal, residence, funeral, marital, etc. Surely it should be coded onto the voter card via a qr or whatever code, and linked into the relevant databases for an easy census to take shape, rooting out criminality, preventing a wrong count.

But your link has emphatically proved there are illegal ballots. An inept and archiac system employed. But from the court's view how can it charge, if the voter cards are wrongfully being sent. It seems like the tip of an iceberg.

Isn't the state at fault for issuing the voter cards to felons? How can it go around and charge the felons when it issued the voter cards. Surely any criminal records should have been checked when cards were sent and requested?

It sounds stupid because it is.

How are these cards and the voter records checked, it seems like an archiac system. A system being abused because it above isn't verifying the cards and records prior to sending them. It simply counts them. It seems on the above information huge faults are occurring.

I bet for example there are multiple votes, and out of state votes because any voter cards aren't being verified by a system of dedicated measures. Checking the recipient's records. On sending and then on count.

At times dystopia has a use. It is the social security number cross linked to the relevant citizenship records, criminal, residence, funeral, marital, etc. Surely it should be coded onto the voter card via a qr or whatever code, and linked into the relevant databases for an easy census to take shape, rooting out criminality, preventing a wrong count.

But your link has emphatically proved there are illegal ballots. An inept and archiac system employed. But from the court's view how can it charge, if the voter cards are wrongfully being sent. It seems like the tip of iceberg.

Isn't the state at fault for issuing the voter cards to felons? How can it go around and charge the felons when it issued the voter cards. Surely any criminal records should have been checked when cards were sent and requested?

It sounds stupid because it is.

How are these cards and the voter records checked, it seems like an archiac system. A system being abused because it above isn't verifying the cards and records prior to sending them. It simply counts them. It seems on the above information huge faults are occurring.

I bet for example there are multiple votes, and out of state votes because any voter cards aren't being verified by a system of dedicated measures. Checking the recipient's records. On sending and then on count.

At times dystopia has a use. It is the social security number cross linked to the relevant citizenship records, criminal, residence, funeral, marital, etc. Surely it should be coded onto the voter card via a qr or whatever code, and linked into the relevant databases for an easy census to take shape, rooting out criminality, preventing a wrong count.

But your link has emphatically proved there are illegal ballots. Any inept and archiac system employed. But from the court's view how can it charge, if the voter cards are wrongfully being sent. It seems like the tip of iceberg.

Isn't the state at fault for issuing the voter cards to felons? How can it go around and charge the felons when it issued the voter cards. Surely any criminal records should have been checked when cards were sent and requested?

It sounds stupid because it is.

How are these cards and the voter records checked, it seems like an archiac system. A system being abused because it above isn't verifying the cards and records prior to sending them. It simply counts them. It seems on the above information huge faults are occurring.

I bet for example there are multiple votes, and out of state votes because any voter cards aren't being verified by a system of dedicated measures. Checking the recipient's records. On sending and then on count.

At times dystopia has a use. It is the social security number cross linked to the relevant citizenship records, criminal, residence, funeral, marital, etc. Surely it should be coded onto the voter card via a qr or whatever code, and linked into the relevant databases for an easy census to take shape, rooting out criminality, preventing a wrong count.

Isn't the state at fault for issuing the voter cards to felons? How can it go around and charge the felons when it issued the voter cards. Surely any criminal records should have been checked when cards were sent and requested?

It sounds stupid because it is.

How are these cards and the voter records checked, it seems like an archiac system. A system being abused because it above isn't verifying the cards and records prior to sending them. It simply counts them. It seems on the above information huge faults are occurring.

I bet for example there are multiple votes, and out of state votes because any voter cards aren't being verified by a system of dedicated measures. Checking the recipient's records. On sending and then on count.

Isn't the state at fault for issuing the voter cards to felons? How can it go around and charge the felons when it issued the voter cards. Surely any criminal records should have been checked when cards were sent and requested?

It sounds stupid because it is.

How are these cards and the voter records checked, it seems like an archiac system. A system being abused because it above isn't verifying the cards and records prior to sending them. It simply counts them. It seems on the above information huge faults are occurring.

I bet for example there is multiple votes, and out of state votes because any voter cards aren't being verified by a system of dedicated measures. Checking the recipient's records. On sending and then on count.

Isn't the state at fault for issuing the voter cards to felons? How can it go around and charge the felons when it issued the voter cards. Surely any criminal records should have been checked when cards were sent and requested?

It sounds stupid because it is.

How are these cards and the voter records checked, it seems like an archiac system.