I posted already proof of nanotech and RFID

No. You posted a paper about how some guys made centimeter antenna for a centimeter band from graphene. Centimeter sized antenna in no way could be named "nanotech". That graphene particles they use to make antenna is just a conducting material. With the same result they could make that centimeter antenna from any conductive paint or powder, f.e.

In other of your posts you insist that there is graphene oxide particles in not-a-vaccines.

But graphene and graphene oxide is different substances.

In video you posted about nanomachines clearly visible that they got power and activited by laser light directed to one or another photovoltaic cell of the nanomachine. Laser light band is no way close to 5G bands, so your video have no any connection to your topic except word "nano".

Looks like you just find similar words here and there and without any thoughts and understanding trying to create something that does not exist.

It is actually showing how little you know.

I already forgot more than you will ever know. If you can't even read and understand what is written in paper you share, there is no hope you ever be able to compete with me on knowledge.

Your opinions NEVER include any source or proof

What proof do you need to read about the size of 5G antenna in paper you cited? Or you need a proof that centimeter sized object is no way a "nanotech"?

I posted already proof of nanotech and RFID

No. You posted a paper about how some guys made centimeter antenna for a centimeter band made from graphene. Centimeter sized antenna in no way could be named "nanotech".

In other of your posts you insist that there is graphene oxide particles in not-a-vaccines.

But graphene and graphene oxide is different substances.

In video you posted about nanomachines clearly visible that they got power and activited by laser light directed to one or another photovoltaic cell of the nanomachine. Laser light band is no way close to 5G bands, so your video have no any connection to your topic except word "nano".

Looks like you just find similar words here and there and without any thoughts and understanding trying to create something that does not exist.

It is actually showing how little you know.

I already forgot more than you will ever know. If you can't even read and understand what is written in paper you share, there is no hope you ever be able to compete with me on knowledge.

Your opinions NEVER include any source or proof

What proof do you need to read about the size of 5G antenna in paper you cited? Or you need a proof that centimeter sized object is no way a "nanotech"?