Yes, that is the same case.
The main thing they hide about greenhouse effect is that it lead to lowering all possible temperature gradient on the planet - day vs night, summer vs winter, equator vs poles. Right now in equatorial areas where local greenhouse is in effect, there are tropical forests with gradient near 10°C, and at the same lattitudes there exists deserts where gradient is near 60°C.
Rising of average temperature in some place does not mean higher maximum temperatures, what will you prefer - -10°C to +30°C with average +10°C or +5°C - +25°C with average +15°C? looks like "awful temperature rise", but really it is a nicer and more comfortable climate. That is the real effect of greenhouse on Earth.
Really green Earth from pole to pole without deserts, ice caps and severe weather like hurricanes, tornadoes and other stuff that is driven mostly by temperature gradients. Greenhose effect could make Earth really lovely place that could sustain magnitude orders more people than we have now. Endless habitable land with good agriculture and stable, nice climate with good protection against solar maximums and minimums and other space weather events. As it was, for tens of millions of years in the past with short periods if ice ages. Along with 4 times higher CO2 levels. As an ultimate unconcious thing we keep 20°C at our homes in the honor of that past, and that is exactly the average temperature of eocene when mammals appeared and thrive on Earth. Greenhouse effect is not a problem, it is a solution. But somehow, that elite bastards want it stopped at any cost.
Yes, that is the same case.
The main thing they hide about greenhouse effect is that it lead to lowering all possible temperature gradient on the planet - day vs night, summer vs winter, equator vs poles. Right now in equatorial areas where local greenhouse is in effect, there are tropical forests with gradient near 10°C, and at the same lattitudes there exists deserts where gradient is near 60°C.
Rising of average temperature in some place does not mean higher maximum temperatures, what will you prefer - -10°C to +30°C with average +10°C or +5°C - +25°C with average +15°C? looks like "awful temperature rise", but really it is a nicer and more comfortable climate. That is the real effect of greenhouse on Earth.
Really green Earth from pole to pole without deserts, ice caps and severe weather like hurricanes, tornadoes and other stuff that is driven mostly by temperature gradients. Greenhose effect could make Earth really lovely place that could sustain magnitude more people than we have now. Endless habitable land with good agriculture and stable, nice climate with good protection against solar maximums and minimums and other space weather events. As it was, for tens of millions of years in the past with short periods if ice ages. Along with 4 times higher CO2 levels. As an ultimate unconcious thing we keep 20°C at our homes in the honor of that past, and that is exactly the average temperature of eocene when mammals appeared and thrive on Earth. Greenhouse effect is not a problem, it is a solution. But somehow, that elite bastards want it stopped at any cost.