Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Yes. However charcoal is almost as good, better in some regards, better extraction, except needs far more to be efficient. It is renewable not finite. No, we aren't running out of coal. Not yet in any event.

Nuclear isn't effective when it comes to furnaces. Redundant in fact. Smelting, concrete, metals, steel, glass. Gas is by far and wide a better means. However it is also costly. Electricity requires far more parts, far more power. Making furnace, like turning on kettle, huge drain.

Power generation yes nuclear is without equals, it delivers far more output effectively.

But it's a narrative. A narrative of using non carbon based power sources. Absurdly in many regards. We are on a carbon planet and it has recycled that fuel already. Humans just charge more for their bullshit. Stop man making fire by charging them for electricity. Smells like a bigger con. Look at the price. They still burn it anyway. But the emissions, yes more of them shit everywhere. They aren't clean if they're invasive, computer don't grow on trees.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes. However charcoal is almost as good, better in some regards, better extraction, except needs far more to be efficient. It is renewable not finite. No, we aren't running out of coal. Not yet in any event.

Nuclear isn't effective when it comes to furnaces. Redundant in fact. Smelting, concrete, metals, steel, glass. Gas is by far and wide a better means. However it is also costly. Electricity requires far more parts, far more power. Making furnace, like turning on kettle, huge drain.

Power generation yes nuclear is without equals, it delivers far more output effectively.

But it's a narrative. A narrative of using non carbon based power sources. Absurdly in many regards. We are on a carbon planet and it has recycled that fuel already. Humans just charge more for their bullshit. Stop man making fire by charging them for electricity. Smells like a bigger con. Look at the price. They still burn it anyway.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes. However charcoal is almost as good, better in some regards, better extraction, except needs far more to be efficient. It is renewable not finite. No, we aren't running out of coal. Not yet in any event.

Nuclear isn't effective when it comes to furnaces. Redundant in fact. Smelting, concrete, metals, steel, glass. Gas is by far and wide a better means. However it is also costly. Electricity requires far more parts, far more power. Making furnace, like turning on kettle, huge drain.

Power generation yes nuclear is without equals, it delivers far more output effectively.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes. However charcoal is almost as good, better in some regards, better extraction, except needs far more to be efficient. It is renewable not finite. No, we aren't running out of coal. Not yet in any event.

Nuclear isn't effective when it comes to furnaces. Redundant in fact. Smelting, concrete, merals, steel, glass. Gas is by far and wide a better means. However it is also costly. Electricity requires far more parts, far more power. Making furnace, like turning on kettle, huge drain.

Power generation yes nuclear is without equals, it delivers far more output effectively.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Yes. However charcoal is almost as good, better in some regards, better extraction, except needs far more to be efficient. It is renewable not finite. No, we aren't running out of coal. Not yet in any event.

Nuclear isn't effective when it comes to furnaces. Redundant in fact. Smelting, concrete, merals, steel, glass. Gas is by far and wide a better means. However it is also costly. Electricity requires far more parts.

Power generation yes nuclear is without equals it delivers far more output effectively.

2 years ago
1 score