Sorry, I don't understand - too many doubles negatives to twist around.

OK... i get it... and no - I would say it's NOT an act.

To me, "an act" implies everyone is in on it.

If NOT everyone is in on it (e.g., elected POTUS is assassinated), then it's a legit competition between two opposing forces -- not an act.

ps. unless you are suggesting that TPTB put JFK in power - but only because they wanted to publicly assassinate a POTUS. like just to be super #alpha

to that notion i say: politics is highly orchestrated. but there are multiple power forces at play. and interests almost never perfectly align. #notacting #imo

Sorry, I don't understand - too many doubles negatives to twist around.

OK... i get it... and no - I would say it's NOT an act.

To me, "an act" implies everyone is in on it.

If NOT everyone is in on it (e.g., elected POTUS is assassinated), then it's a legit competition between two opposing forces -- not an act.

ps. unless you are suggesting that TPTB put JFK in power - but only because they wanted to publicly assassinate a POTUS. like just to be super #alpha

to that notion i say: politics is highly orchestrated. but there are multiple power forces at play. and interests almost never perfectly align. #imo #notacting

Sorry, I don't understand - too many doubles negatives to twist around.

OK... i get it... and no - I would say it's NOT an act.

To me, "an act" implies everyone is in on it.

If NOT everyone is in on it (e.g., elected POTUS is assassinated), then it's a legit competition between two opposing forces -- not an act.

ps. unless you are suggesting that TPTB put JFK in power - but only because they wanted to publicly assassinate a POTUS. like just to be super #alpha

to that notion i say: politics is highly orchestrated. but there are multiple power forces at play. and interests almost never perfectly align. #imo

Sorry, I don't understand - too many doubles negatives to twist around.

OK... i get it... and no - I would say it's NOT an act.

To me, "an act" implies everyone is in on it.

If NOT everyone is in on it (e.g., elected POTUS is assassinated), then it's a legit competition between two opposing forces -- not an act.

ps. unless you are suggesting that TPTB put JFK in power - but only because they wanted to publicly assassinate a POTUS. like just to be super #alpha

to that notion i say: politics is highly orchestrated. but there are multiple power forces at play. except if/when everyone is getting paid, interests almost never perfectly align. #imo

Sorry, I don't understand - too many doubles negatives to twist around.

OK... i get it... and no - I would say it's NOT an act.

To me, "an act" implies everyone is in on it.

If NOT everyone is in on it (e.g., elected POTUS is assassinated), then it's a legit competition between two opposing forces -- not an act.

ps. unless you are suggesting that TPTB put JFK in power - but only because they wanted to publicly assassinate a POTUS. like just to be super #alpha

to that notion i say: politics is highly orchestrated. but there are multiple power forces at play. and they almost never perfectly align. #imo

Sorry, I don't understand - too many doubles negatives to twist around.

OK... i get it... and no - I would say it's NOT an act.

To me, "an act" implies everyone is in on it.

If NOT everyone is in on it (e.g., elected POTUS is assassinated), then it's a legit competition between two opposing forces -- not an act.

Sorry, I don't understand - too many doubles negatives to twist around.

OK... i get it... and no - I would say it's NOT an act.

To me, "an act" implies everyone is in on it.

If NOT everyone is in on it (e.g., POTUS is killed), then it's a legit competition between two opposing forces -- not an act.