Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

You seem dumb/shilly.

The specifics are irrelevant.

We can already prove they used a mule operation to swing the election. Literally prove.

This was a red herring. All the details were part of that red herring. That doesn't mean that some of those details aren't important or shouldn't be addressed--but they wanted you focused on that instead of mules.

Powell, along with everyone else, was focused on the shiny object the CIA dangled in front of them, rather than the real op.

It's not that I'm saying it isn't a problem. I'm saying they lit two fires, and want you focused on that, while the second fire burns unnoticed, and with far greater damage.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You seem dumb/shilly.

The specifics are irrelevant.

We can already prove they used a mule operation to swing the election. Literally prove.

This was a red herring. All the details were part of that red herring. That doesn't mean that some of those details aren't important or shouldn't be addressed--but they wanted you focused on that instead of mules.

Powell, along with everyone else, was focused on the shiny object the CIA dangled in front of them, rather than the real op.

You got a mighty big stick up that puckered asshole.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

You seem dumb/shilly.

The specifics are irrelevant.

We can already prove they used a mule operation to swing the election. Literally prove.

This was a red herring. All the details were part of that red herring. Powell, along with everyone else, was focused on the shiny object the CIA dangled in front of them, rather than the real op.

You got a mighty big stick up that puckered asshole.

2 years ago
1 score