Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Controlling what anybody thinks is fundamentally against the bill of rights.

Of course broadcast and the Internet have worked around this by adding laws and various meanings. Programming various narratives. But controlling what people think is sedition. They might as well be mind controlling the POTUS as opposed to be offering choice or selective programs.

No, there is no controlling what people think. That's Communism and Fascism. People are free to think what they want, and should also be free to speak it within reasonable discussion. Clarifying reasonable discussion, anything where the threat of violence or harm doesn't persist. Apart from possibly in war, or there of.

Yea there is grounds for a lawsuit. It's not their program, it's social media, a platform for free speech and debate. Not mind control the Potus. By banning who they want.

It's nicer to dream of before the before the bullshit. When these assholes didn't usurp the narrative. Now they are akin to an opposing ideology. Fuck them fuck it. Jettison them into Mars.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Controlling what anybody thinks is fundamentally against the bill of rights.

Of course broadcast and the Internet have worked around this by adding laws and various meanings. Programming various narratives. But controlling what people think is sedition. They might as well be mind controlling the POTUS as opposed to be offering choice or selective programs.

No, there is no controlling what people think. That's Communism and Fascism. People are free to think what they want, and should also be free to speak it within reasonable discussion. Clarifying reasonable discussion, anything where the threat of violence or harm doesn't persist. Apart from possibly in war, or there of.

Yea there is grounds for a lawsuit. It's not their program, it's social media, a platform for free speech and debate. Not mind control the Potus. By banning who they want.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Controlling what anybody thinks is fundamentally against the bill of rights.

Of course broadcast and the Internet have worked around this by adding laws and various meanings. Programming various narratives. But controlling what people think is sedition. They might as well be mind controlling the POTUS as opposed to be offering choice or selective programs.

No, there is no controlling what people think. That's Communism and Fascism. People are free to think what they want, and should also be free to speak it within reasonable discussion.

Yea there is grounds for a lawsuit. It's not their program, it's social media, a platform for free speech and debate. Not mind control the Potus. By banning who they want.

2 years ago
1 score