No it is a useless assumption. It is often only from a postion of provided literacy based on the evolutionary model.

Where perhaps genes over time breed intelligence, where others breed strength.

IQ doesn't measure much. In contrary environments how does intellect adapt. Only with the tools and resources at hand in a process of interaction taking much longer to develop. Interaction from primarily conflict. Our species only tends to peak in its advancements from fight or flight. Without it techniques have taken far longer to progress. By conflict it has often assumed literacy or dominance.

I am only here to debate. I don't have to prove my IQ. Unlike look at yours. If that was an intelligent response I pity your IQ, it is the equivalent of a nigger's.

No it is a useless assumption. It is often only from a postion of provided literacy based on the evolutionary model.

Where perhaps genes over time breed intelligence, where others breed strength.

IQ doesn't measure much. In contrary environments how does intellect adapt. Only with the tools and resources at hand in a process of interaction taking much longer to develop. Interaction from primarily conflict. Our species only tends to peaks in its advancements from fight or flight. Without it techniques have taken far longer to progress.

I am only here to debate. I don't have to prove my IQ. Unlike look at yours. If that was an intelligent response I pity your IQ, it is the equivalent of a nigger's.

No it is a useless assumption. It is often only from a postion of provided literacy based on the evolutionary model.

Where perhaps genes over time breed intelligence, where others breed strength.

IQ doesn't measure much. In contrary environments how does intellect adapt. Only with the tools and resources at hand in a process of interaction taking much longer to develop.

I am only here to debate. I don't have to prove my IQ. Unlike look at yours. If that was an intelligent response I pity your IQ, it is the equivalent of a nigger's.