Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Getting so tired of online press and social media platforms. Where there is no law on blatant misinformation from the press. But it thinks to police the public for the same, often innocently.

I have seen so much nonsense being pressed on Ukraine. Stories that aren't factual. Not verified. Are lies. Yet all of 5 minutes ago, it was an inquisition against people questioning COVID. Fact checkers and lawsuits deployed.

Again I don't care. Not picking a side until I am in war. Then I pick my nation. But the bias being spewed is unfactual and the majority is from social media and online press. Sources people wouldn't find in store bought papers, because it would be sued. Falling under national laws. But somehow nobody can sue social media. But it can sue the public, and perm ban it for simply challenging the narratives spewed which are often outright lies.

No I don't want censorship either. I want fairness. I don't want it banned. I want free speech. So people can discuss it. Currently there's only outright hypocrisy and disgusting manipulation. It's utterly skewed.

I cannot even form an opinion on this. Some random twitter. Yet yesterday every online paper ran with it was destroyed. Posting that now. It is obviously a ban to cover the press lying. Or do they get the same treatment? Ban every shit spreading online paper. Ban the platform for not fact checking it. Or simply let everybody else challenge it and the rest of their abuse? https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/t57r4t/the_moment_zelensky_hears_about_the_bombing_of/

Look at it echo a lie. Either it allows every opinion so people can object and form facts. Or take it down completely. Sadly the parasites running it only want to manipulate opinions to hide their lies.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Getting so tired of online press and social media platforms. Where there is no law on blatant misinformation from the press. But it thinks to police the public for the same, often innocently.

I have seen so much nonsense being pressed on Ukraine. Stories that aren't factual. Not verified. Are lies. Yet all of 5 minutes ago, it was an inquisition against people questioning COVID. Fact checkers and lawsuits deployed.

Again I don't care. Not picking a side until I am in war. Then I pick my nation. But the bias being spewed is unfactual and the majority is from social media and online press. Sources people wouldn't find in store bought papers, because it would be sued. Falling under national laws. But somehow nobody can sue social media. But it can sue the public, and perm ban it for simply challenging the narratives spewed which are often outright lies.

No I don't want censorship either. I want fairness. I don't want it banned. I want free speech. So people can discuss it. Currently there's only outright hypocrisy and disgusting manipulation. It's utterly skewed.

I cannot even form an opinion on this. Some random twitter. Yet yesterday every online paper ran with it was destroyed. Posting that now. It is obviously a ban to cover the press lying. Or do they get the same treatment? Ban every shit spreading online paper. Ban the platform for not fact checking it. Or simply let everybody else challenge it and the rest of their abuse? https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/t57r4t/the_moment_zelensky_hears_about_the_bombing_of/

Look at it echo a lie. Either it allows every opinion so people can object and form facts. Or take it down completely. Sadly the parasites running it. Only want to manipulate opinions to hide their lies.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Getting so tired of online press and social media platforms. Where there is no law on blatant misinformation from the press. But it thinks to police the public for the same, often innocently.

I have seen so much nonsense being pressed on Ukraine. Stories that aren't factual. Not verified. Are lies. Yet all of 5 minutes ago, it was an inquisition against people questioning COVID. Fact checkers and lawsuits deployed.

Again I don't care. Not picking a side until I am in war. Then I pick my nation. But the bias being spewed is unfactual and the majority is from social media and online press. Sources people wouldn't find in store bought papers, because it would be sued. Falling under national laws. But somehow nobody can sue social media. But it can sue the public, and perm ban it for simply challenging the narratives spewed which are often outright lies.

No I don't want censorship either. I want fairness. I don't want it banned. I want free speech. So people can discuss it. Currently there's only outright hypocrisy and disgusting manipulation. It's utterly skewed.

I cannot even form an opinion on this. Some random twitter. Yet yesterday every online paper ran with it was destroyed. Posting that now. It is obviously a ban to cover the press lying. Or do they get the same treatment? Ban every shit spreading online paper. Ban the platform for not fact checking it. Or simply let everybody else challenge it and the rest of their abuse? https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/t57r4t/the_moment_zelensky_hears_about_the_bombing_of/

Look at it echo a lie. Either it allows every opinion so people can object and form facts. Or take it down completely.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Getting so tired of online press and social media platforms. Where there is no law on blatant misinformation from the press. But it thinks to police the public for the same, often innocently.

I have seen so much nonsense being pressed on Ukraine. Stories that aren't factual. Not verified. Are lies. Yet all of 5 minutes ago, it was an inquisition against people questioning COVID. Fact checkers and lawsuits deployed.

Again I don't care. Not picking a side until I am in war. Then I pick my nation. But the bias being spewed is unfactual and the majority is from social media and online press. Sources people wouldn't find in store bought papers, because it would be sued. Falling under national laws. But somehow nobody can sue social media. But it can sue the public, and perm ban it for simply challenging the narratives spewed which are often outright lies.

No I don't want censorship either. I want fairness. I don't want it banned. I want free speech. So people can discuss it. Currently there's only outright hypocrisy and disgusting manipulation. It's utterly skewed.

I cannot even form an opinion on this. Some random twitter. Yet yesterday every online paper ran with it was destroyed. Posting that now. It is obviously a ban to cover the press lying. Or do they get the same treatment? Ban every shit spreading online paper. Ban the platform for not fact checking it. Or simply let everybody else challenge it and the rest of their abuse? https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/t57r4t/the_moment_zelensky_hears_about_the_bombing_of/

Ban the platform. Look at it echo a lie.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Getting so tired of online press and social media platforms. Where there is no law on blatant misinformation from the press. But it thinks to police the public for the same, often innocently.

I have seen so much nonsense being pressed on Ukraine. Stories that aren't factual. Not verified. Are lies. Yet all of 5 minutes ago, it was an inquisition against people questioning COVID. Fact checkers and lawsuits deployed.

Again I don't care. Not picking a side until I am in war. Then I pick my nation. But the bias being spewed is unfactual and the majority is from social media and online press. Sources people wouldn't find in store bought papers, because it would be sued. Falling under national laws. But somehow nobody can sue social media. But it can sue the public, and perm ban it for simply challenging the narratives spewed which are often outright lies.

No I don't want censorship either. I want fairness. I don't want it banned. I want free speech. So people can discuss it. Currently there's only outright hypocrisy and disgusting manipulation. It's utterly skewed.

I cannot even form an opinion on this. Some random twitter. Yet yesterday every online paper ran with it was destroyed. Posting that now. It is obviously a ban to cover the press lying. Or do they get the same treatment? Ban every shit spreading online paper. Ban the platform for not fact checking it. Or simply let everybody else challenge it and the rest of their abuse?

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Getting so tired of online press and social media platforms. Where there is no law on blatant misinformation from the press. But it thinks to police the public for the same, often innocently.

I have seen so much nonsense being pressed on Ukraine. Stories that aren't factual. Not verified. Are lies. Yet all of 5 minutes ago, it was an inquisition against people questioning COVID. Fact checkers and lawsuits deployed.

Again I don't care. Not picking a side until I am in war. Then I pick my nation. But the bias being spewed is unfactual and the majority is from social media and online press. Sources people wouldn't find in store bought papers, because it would be sued. Falling under national laws. But somehow nobody can sue social media. But it can sue the public, and perm ban it for simply challenging the narratives spewed which are often outright lies.

No I don't want censorship either. I want fairness. I don't want it banned. I want free speech. So people can discuss it. Currently there's only outright hypocrisy and disgusting manipulation. It's utterly skewed.

I cannot even form an opinion on this. Some random twitter. Yet yesterday every online paper ran with it was destroyed. Posting that now. Is obviously a ban to cover the press lying. Or do they get the same treatment? Ban every shit spreading online paper. Ban the platform for not fact checking it. Or simply let everybody else challenge it and the rest of their abuse?

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Getting so tired of online press and social media platforms. Where there is no law on blatant misinformation from the press. But it thinks to police the public for the same, often innocently.

I have seen so much nonsense being pressed on Ukraine. Stories that aren't factual. Not verified. Are lies. Yet all of 5 minutes ago, it was an inquisition against people questioning COVID. Fact checkers and lawsuits deployed.

Again I don't care. Not picking a side until I am in war. Then I pick my nation. But the bias being spewed is unfactual and the majority is from social media and online press. Sources people wouldn't find in store bought papers, because it would be sued. Falling under national laws. But somehow nobody can sue social media. But it can sue the public, and perm ban it for simply challenging the narratives spewed which are often outright lies.

No I don't want censorship either. I want fairness. I don't want it banned. I want free speech. So people can discuss it. Currently there's only outright hypocrisy and disgusting manipulation. It's utterly skewed.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Getting so tired of online press and social media platforms. Where there is no law on blatant misinformation from the press. But it thinks to police the public for the same, often innocently.

I have seen so much nonsense being pressed on Ukraine. Stories that aren't factual. Not verified. Are lies. Yet all of 5 minutes ago, it was an inquisition against people questioning COVID. Fact checkers and lawsuits deployed.

Again I don't care. Not picking a side until I am in war. Then I pick my nation. But the bias being spewed is unfactual and the majority is from social media and online press. Sources people wouldn't find in store bought papers, because it would be sued. Falling under national laws. But somehow nobody can sue social media. But it can sue the public, and perm ban it for simply challenging the narratives spewed which are often outright lies.

No I don't want censorship either. I want fairness. I don't want it banned. I want free speech. So people can discuss it.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Getting so tired of online press and social media platforms. Where there is no law on blatant misinformation from the press. But it thinks to police the public for the same, often innocently.

I have seen so much nonsense being pressed on Ukraine. Stories that aren't factual. Not verified. Are lies. Yet all of 5 minutes ago, it was an inquisition against people questioning COVID. Fact checkers and lawsuits deployed.

Again I don't care. Not picking a side until I am in war. Then I pick my nation. But the bias being spewed is unfactual and the majority is from social media and online press. Sources people wouldn't find in store bought papers, because it would be sued. Falling under national laws. But somehow nobody can sue social media. But it can sue the public, and perm ban it for simply challenging the narratives spewed which are often outright lies.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Getting so tired of online press and social media platforms. Where there is no law on blatant misinformation from the press. But it thinks to police the public for the same, often innocently.

I have seen so much nonsense being pressed on Ukraine. Stories that aren't factual. Not verified. Are lies. Yet all of 5 minutes ago, it was an inquisition against people questioning COVID.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Getting so tired of online press and social media platforms. Where there is no law on blatant misinformation from the press. But it thinks to police the public for the same, often innocently.

I have seen some much nonsense being pressed on Ukraine. Stories that aren't factual. Not verified. Are lies. Yet all of 5 minutes ago, it was an inquisition against people questioning COVID.

2 years ago
1 score