You're mistaken if you think all that "aid" is really reaching those people. It's often a way to launder money into those countries for whatever purposes (not much different from Greenpeace, Ford Foundation, Clinton Foundation etc.).

So actually those countries might be better off as well if all that money stopped coming in. Aid also keeps people from becoming self-sufficient (i.e. country will stay weak and dependent).

You're mistaken if you think all that "aid" is really reaching those people. It's often a way to launder money into those countries for whatever purposes (not much different from Greenpeace, Ford Foundation, Clinton Foundation etc.).

So actually those countries might be better off as well if all that money stopped coming in. Aid also keeps people from becoming self-sufficient (i.e. country will be weak and dependent).

You're mistaken if you think all that "aid" is really reaching those people. It's often a way to launder money into those countries for whatever purposes (not much different from Greenpeace, Ford Foundation, Clinton Foundation etc.).

So actually those countries might be better off as well if all that money stopped coming in. Aid also keeps people from becoming self-sufficient (i.e. country will be weak and dependent).

You're mistaken if you think all that "aid" is really reaching those people. It's often a way to launder money into those countries for whatever purposes (not much different from Greenpeace, Ford Foundation, Clinton Foundation etc.).

So actually those countries might be better off as well if all that money stopped coming in. Aid also keeps people from becoming self-sufficient.

You're mistaken if you think all that "aid" is really reaching those people. It's often a way to launder money into those countries for whatever purposes (not much different from Greenpeace, Ford Foundation, Clinton Foundation etc.).

So actually those countries might be better off as well if all that money stopped coming in.

You're mistaken if you think all that "aid" is really reaching those people. It's often a way to launder money into those countries for whatever purposes (not much different from Greenpeace, Ford Foundation, Clinton Foundation etc.).

So actually those countries might be better off as well if all that money stopped coming in. They'll learn to be self-sufficient, and hence more stable.

You're mistaken if you think all that "aid" is really reaching those people. It's often a way to launder money into those countries for whatever purposes (not much different from Clinton Foundation etc.).

So actually those countries might be better off as well if all that money stopped coming in. They'll learn to be self-sufficient, and hence more stable.

You're mistaken if you think all that "aid" is really reaching those people. It's often a way to launder money into those countries for whatever purposes (not much different from Clinton Foundation etc.).

So actually those countries might be better off as well if all that money stopped coming in. They'll become self-sufficient, and hence more stable.

You're mistaken if you think all that "aid" is really reaching those people. It's often a way to launder money into those countries for whatever purposes (not much different from Clinton Foundation etc.). So actually those countries might be better off as well if all that money stopped coming in.