Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Yeh great work retard, sounds like you've just repurposed some other issue for your confirmation bias.

If you have papers saying there is protein shedding from the cell surface link it.

There's no question the vaccines can just infect whatever cell it wants based on chance, but that doesn't mean there's just spike proteins floating throughout the fucking body, mRNA is injected in a cell and that cell produces the spike on it's surface. It's based on chance WHICH cells are injected produces different problems, such has ovaries / heart / nerve.

The rest is just you just running away with your retard logic.

Yep so based on your edit you have no clue what you're talking about, you don't seem to understand that the protein is produced on the surface of the cell, not loose in the body. The science never said that it the mRNA would HAVE to infect the cells closest to the injection site, they just assumed that based on random chance, that it wouldn't likely travel that far for most people. A wrong assumption.

The cell has the spike on it's surface, the immune system attacks that cell, not the spike protein, because it's not a separate thing floating in your body.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yeh great work retard, sounds like you've just repurposed some other issue for your confirmation bias.

If you have papers saying there is protein shedding from the cell surface link it.

There's no question the vaccines can just infect whatever cell it wants based on chance, but that doesn't mean there's just spike proteins floating throughout the fucking body, mRNA is injected in a cell and that cell produces the spike on it's surface. It's based on chance WHICH cells are injected produces different problems, such has ovaries / heart / nerve.

The rest is just you just running away with your retard logic.

Yep so based on your edit you have no clue what you're talking about, you don't seem to understand that the protein is produced on the surface of the cell, not loose in the body. The science never said that it the mRNA would HAVE to infect the cells closest to the injection site, they just assumed that based on random chance, that it wouldn't likely travel that far for most people. A wrong assumption.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yeh great work retard, sounds like you've just repurposed some other issue for your confirmation bias.

If you have papers saying there is protein shedding from the cell surface link it.

There's no question the vaccines can just infect whatever cell it wants based on chance, but that doesn't mean there's just spike proteins floating throughout the fucking body, mRNA is injected in a cell and that cell produces the spike on it's surface. It's based on chance WHICH cells are injected produces different problems, such has ovaries / heart / nerve.

The rest is just you just running away with your retard logic.

Yep so based on your edit you have no clue what you're talking about, you don't seem to understand that the protein is produced on the surface of the cell, not lose in the body. The science never said that it the mRNA would HAVE to infect the cells closest to the injection site, they just assumed that based on random chance, that it wouldn't likely travel that far for most people. A wrong assumption.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yeh great work retard, sounds like you've just repurposed some other issue for your confirmation bias.

If you have papers saying there is protein shedding from the cell surface link it.

There's no question the vaccines can just infect whatever cell it wants based on chance, but that doesn't mean there's just spike proteins floating throughout the fucking body, mRNA is injected in a cell and that cell produces the spike on it's surface. It's based on chance WHICH cells are injected produces different problems, such has ovaries / heart / nerve.

The rest is just you just running away with your retard logic.

Yep so based on your edit you have no clue what you're talking about, you don't seem to understand that the protein is produced on the surface of the cell, not lose in the body. The science never said that it the nRMA would HAVE to infect the cells closest to the injection site, they just assumed that based on random chance, that it wouldn't likely travel that far for most people. A wrong assumption.

3 years ago
1 score