The Flat Earth idea has some tremendous problems, namely tides, eclipses and the Coriolis effect.

As for the moon landing, I think the alien bases and the microtektites all over the surface would be weirdness enough to use faked photos.

Similarly, somebody once told me that nukes are not real because every movie of a nuclear explosion looks strange. Turns out there were UFOs at every single one of those nuclear tests. Scrubbing them from the films was difficult and left the movies looking "a little bit off".

I'm just saying these things to point out that there can be more than one explanation for "strange" things.

But to conclude, the moving magnetic field is easy to demonstrate: every airport has had to re-number their runways according to the changes in position of the field. From there, it's easy to realize that it makes a lot more sense for the field to move on a "ball" Earth than a flat one.

The Flat Earth idea has some tremendous problems, namely tides, eclipses and the Coriolis effect.

As for the moon landing, I think the alien bases and the microtektites all over the surface would be weirdness enough to use faked photos.

Similarly, somebody once told me that nukes are not real because every movie of a nuclear explosion looks strange. Turns out there were UFOs at every single one of those nuclear tests. Scrubbing them from the films was difficult and left the movies looking "a little bit off".

I'm just saying these things to point out that there can be more than one explanation for "strange" things.