"They" claim rockets go X speed. Google says the fastest manned aircraft went Y speed. Y < X. There are people on rockets. Therefore, rockets are fake.
Of course it is a flat earth channel. That is the only sort of place such an argument would be accepted. And of course he said "craft" even though the AI answer said "aircraft" lmao. Too bad globers know how to pause the video and read.
They say it goes X speed in orbit, but a bullet only goes Y speed [where Y is much less than X] down here on the ground.
I can't believe he actually pointed out that we cannot see a bullet flying through the air! And finally,
They say it goes X speed in orbit [where X is really fast], but it seems to be going very slowly after it starts up. Maybe it is a balloon instead?
EDIT: I upvoted your post again and again. My upvote is removed as soon as I refresh the page... I don't know what is going on, but I think you should know I tried.
I'm not a mod but it may be that handshakes are prevented from upvoting. The reason for this would be to thwart vote manipulation. It is great that no email is required here, but it makes it easy to create bot brigades.
Thank you for the explanation, it sounds reasonable!
And you're the second person talking about this "handshake"... Am I missing something here? I know I am really bad at this IT stuff, but where can I view this handshake, you talk about? Please, if you can help me here, I would greatly appreciate it.
I have come to the conclusion NASA is a very expensive movie studio. I have yet to come across a single photo of the Earth taken from space, I mean real photo not CGI. We can supposedly have real photos of Pluto, which according to NASA is "about 3.7 billion miles (5.9 billion kilometers) farther away, Pluto is about 39 times farther away than the Earth is from the Sun.".
So we can have not one but many actual photos of Pluto, but not a single actual photo of the Earth? whatever we pay NASA, I know it's in billions of dollars a year, it's too much. A single dollar is too much for fraud.
Yeah, there are no photos at all. Everything is CGI, including images from the 1950s. None to be found anywhere. It's not that people are just showing CGI images, which obviously exist, and claiming that every image is.
There were no photos of Pluto until 2015 when we did a fly by. Prior to that, everything was just a couple of dots on a telescope image.
240,000 miles through two deadly radiation belts. 240,000 miles back. In this.
This is why no one takes these theories seriously. No, we are not just NASA fanbois who have been brainwashed by Bill Nye.
The LM in no way at all can be construed to have "gone back" lmao. The LM was left behind and the space is fake people know this. A typical retarded thing I see is a demand to zoom in from earth and take a photo of the lander (this is an absurd thing to ask for). The apparently rinky dink design of the LM is specifically because of its very limited usage profile.
This is all ignoring the other problems with the meme, such as the LM not being used during the trip to the moon either, it being totally enclosed during liftoff, and of course the Van Allen belts not being too deadly. And there is nothing wrong with adhering aluminium foil to it, no one ever explains what is supposedly wrong with that.
The dumbest thing moon hoaxers ever say about the LM:
That would never fly on earth!
Ummm, yes. Correct. Congratulations on your powers of deduction.
Of course it is a flat earth channel. That is the only sort of place such an argument would be accepted. And of course he said "craft" even though the AI answer said "aircraft" lmao. Too bad globers know how to pause the video and read.
I can't believe he actually pointed out that we cannot see a bullet flying through the air! And finally,
Or maybe it started on the ground and needs to accelerate?
Supreme video! Upvoted and saved!
If I may help you in any way, I have this example:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TOU7oi1xEfpr (short video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4&t=2247s (the video shown to Buzz Aldrin)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/g24Ek1vdbkoG (full uncut video + Aldrin's reaction)
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=buzz+aldrin+33rd+degree+mason&t=brave&ia=images&iax=images (Buzz Aldrin is a 33rd degree freemason / pictures)
EDIT: I upvoted your post again and again. My upvote is removed as soon as I refresh the page... I don't know what is going on, but I think you should know I tried.
I'm not a mod but it may be that handshakes are prevented from upvoting. The reason for this would be to thwart vote manipulation. It is great that no email is required here, but it makes it easy to create bot brigades.
Correct.
So how long until it goes off?
When your account has 50 points
Ok, thank you!
If I may ask, does that mean 50 point by comments + posts collectively, or just 50 comments points, or just 50 posts points?
Thank you for the explanation, it sounds reasonable!
And you're the second person talking about this "handshake"... Am I missing something here? I know I am really bad at this IT stuff, but where can I view this handshake, you talk about? Please, if you can help me here, I would greatly appreciate it.
You see, that's why I don't need to use TV or Hollywood to watch comedies. All I have to do is watch & listen to a NASA so-called expert talking.
https://youtu.be/OCNTE5deB9o?si=8fiJgchn7VPIu4Mo&t=214
Another joke is how the vacuum of space somehow doesn't suck up the atmosphere made up of gas...lol
I have come to the conclusion NASA is a very expensive movie studio. I have yet to come across a single photo of the Earth taken from space, I mean real photo not CGI. We can supposedly have real photos of Pluto, which according to NASA is "about 3.7 billion miles (5.9 billion kilometers) farther away, Pluto is about 39 times farther away than the Earth is from the Sun.".
So we can have not one but many actual photos of Pluto, but not a single actual photo of the Earth? whatever we pay NASA, I know it's in billions of dollars a year, it's too much. A single dollar is too much for fraud.
Yeah, there are no photos at all. Everything is CGI, including images from the 1950s. None to be found anywhere. It's not that people are just showing CGI images, which obviously exist, and claiming that every image is.
There were no photos of Pluto until 2015 when we did a fly by. Prior to that, everything was just a couple of dots on a telescope image.
Fly by? and you believe them? these are the same people who told you we landed on the moon in this.
This is why no one takes these theories seriously. No, we are not just NASA fanbois who have been brainwashed by Bill Nye.
The LM in no way at all can be construed to have "gone back" lmao. The LM was left behind and the space is fake people know this. A typical retarded thing I see is a demand to zoom in from earth and take a photo of the lander (this is an absurd thing to ask for). The apparently rinky dink design of the LM is specifically because of its very limited usage profile.
This is all ignoring the other problems with the meme, such as the LM not being used during the trip to the moon either, it being totally enclosed during liftoff, and of course the Van Allen belts not being too deadly. And there is nothing wrong with adhering aluminium foil to it, no one ever explains what is supposedly wrong with that.
The dumbest thing moon hoaxers ever say about the LM:
Ummm, yes. Correct. Congratulations on your powers of deduction.
We still after all the proof have nasa fan boys here...lol its pathetic
The problem is that the things cited as proof, aren't. You literally posted above:
Well, I do agree with characterizing that as a "joke" at least.