That's not a site for gematria. I used an actual site tho, and your argument doesn't help you in any way. Just shows that you're pushing for this book, while you can't give any good argument from it, which I haven't demolished already.
Also, I am not falling for the multiple comments scenario, where you want to divert the topic in 2, or more comment chains. I can contain my reply in a single comment, can you?
So, as usual, I will be ignoring most of your fake insults and fake boasting, while this would be the reply to your 2nd comment, since you can't follow a simple comment chain, unfortunately.
There is no 'official site for gematria' fool. And that isn't gematria. Absolute ignorance.
It is gematria. Gematrix is the biggest site on that, or one of the biggest. If you don't believe it, count the numbers yourself.
Yeshua is NOT an 'original name of Jesus' and you don't 'get' what is behind gematria in the first place, so you're the last to determine 'worth'.
Plain wrong. :D I already sent the wiki link, but here it is again - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeshua#Original_name_for_Jesus (Notice the name of the paragraph - "Original name of Jesus". I just like it that you literally quoted it in your statement. Irony abounds.)
You said 'All these religions are satanic" and I said 'All religions that use magic ritual are satanic'.
That doesn't follow. A theoretical satanism, without the rituals, is still satanism.
Today I learn that the ancient study of the movement of the heavens and mentioned in a myriad of ways in 'the bible' was invented by Helena Blavatsky. You read Helena Blavatsky's work, or did you let a third party dictate to you? Either way, your statement is trash. Aquarius as new outpouring is exactly what is going on here, but you wouldn't know that, being ignorant of the subject.
How so? You previously assumed I didn't know anything about the age of whatever, then I showed you the source + the name of her works includes Lucifer - the devil from... drum roll... The Bible. Hello?
YOU believe in a god named Lucifer. It's in the bible remember? So your bible believes in the god Lucifer. I wonder what the name Lucifer could mean. I wonder why he goes under several 'names' that count out as meaning under gematria, but you don't know that. Lucifer is material knowledge. Material knowledge by itself is profane. Hell, you don't even qualify for that....let alone the ability to discern that knowledge aka wisdom.
You don't get to reinterpret ancient knowledge. Before you were born, and before Helena Blavatsky was born, Lucifer was the name for the devil. You choose to attribute the devil's name to whatever you want. Doesn't change the fact that you both follow a satanic ideology. And you both seem to like the ancient name of the devil. Why not call it another name? Because demons are called with their name... Don't you know the saying? "Speak of the devil, and he shall appear" Classic satanism.
You, as a literalist practitioner of magic are more closely akin to the Satanist and Satan is a Christian god by definition and circumstance. Both Lucifer and Jesus are said to be the 'Morning Star'......explain. No....don't even try, it'll make me laugh.
:D How are they one against another? I don't know how it would make you laugh, I am laughing already... :D Your tirades are hilarious, I gotta admit. :D
Hey, they both have eyes... Perhaps they are the same... :D Wait, they both have heads too?! Wait a minute... :D The term "morning star" means HOPE. A light that shines in the morning (time of mourning). It's not a hard concept, and it's not an actual light in the sky... :D It's ironic that you accuse me of being literal, while that's what you're doing.. :D You make me laugh... be serious, I struggle to put forth arguments when you make me laugh so much... :D
Now you learn that 17 is The Star, not to be confused with Tsaddi, neither of which you understand...and so you don't really belong in the movement of Q/17/The Star.....as you reject the new outpouring of eternal truths.
Indeed, count me out of your satanism and any kind of satanism.
This is like discussing Calculus with a five year old.
Sure, sure.. It just so happens that I am a mathematician and when winning in international competitions, the US team was comprised by 3 Chinese kids and an Indian kid... Imagine that... :D Your boasting only makes me laugh... :D
So I'll continue to redpill you with information and you can continue with sheer denial of something unknown, while pretending, so we can show our proper positions. Bad religion is how we got here. Raise it up to the eternal principles and you'll experience a Great Awakening instead.
How so? Your sources are only confirmed satanists. You even quoted crowley on his tarot bs. :D
A lot of gibberish this time from you... Very weak arguments. You're not even responding to my challenges. I'll take it as you've lost the argument and now being angry due to it... I hope you don't lose your mind tho...
Anyway... This discussion has been... well, terrible, not gonna sugarcoat it. You can't control your emotions for a simple discussion on theology. You present many of the traits of someone losing an argument, while they can't deal with it - dodging topics, insulting, mocking, can't stay on point, can't deliver proof of his own claims, etc., etc. This has gone beyond a rational discussion, which only shows that the satanic rage couldn't win against heaven, surely, it can't win against someone trying to be a Christian. Weak argumentation, or non-existent.
In conclusion, this has been educational for me, in the least of ways. I usually debate people of higher intellect, so when I lose an argument, I feel that I won knowledge at least. With you is just more insults and empty boasting... As much as I like to see a meltdown, I think we should end it here. I've given you more than reasonably sufficient opportunities to defend your argument, and you couldn't. If your emotions control you, then don't control me... So we can't converse on the same level, thankfully!
OMG
As previously stated, demonstrated in the book, and ignored....Three circles are the traditional three dimensional 'worlds' you know nothing of except as an anthropromorphic 'trinity'.
So in the 'three worlds', they intersect and their intersection as three circles for reasons you know nothing about......they create two Vesica Pisces - 2 FISHES. Vescia Pisces. You know.......c'mon, you're the expert.....right? Right?
5,000 is the area of the 'magic square' used in the calculation.
The formula is proof that the story was fashioned to fit the formula......NOT.....the other way around. Which is a very important point that remains hidden to 'the profane', the '99',
the 'babes in christ'. et al. When I was a child, I spake as a child. Time to put on the big boy pants and learn things.
You're just a childish liar and I don't have time for children whining in place of discussion of subjects you avoid.....every....single.....time. Suddenly avoidance is expertise huh?
Losers don't read let alone understand.
So you're a math expert who cries and avoids a book that uses math as theological proofs. Why don't you take up acting?
ROFL You're a math expert now. I can't get over that. You've just made my day !!
Off the top of your pointy head, what's the square root of 2?
Top of your little math expert head, what is it?
You mean, your 'expertise' in a 'contest' in 5th grade didn't allow you to answer without help?
"Experts" I read about them all day, every day in the press. You must be one because you have NO idea wtf you're pretending to talk about.
I came to one actual expert on certain subjects by looking for another soul who might understand the formula 1 over phi to the power of negative 3. One. One person on social media channels understood and had posts about it. It was you was it?
Being the expert. Please help me out here and expound on the formula. Wait, you're going to have to learn what phi is first.
It's all in that book....that you read and can critique. I mean.....you read it right?.....
Do you accuse people who refer you to the bible of just trying to promote a book? Why not?
You've not allowed a discussion of POINTS referred TO in the book. NONE. ZERO. You didn't read. You didn't attempt. You're a fraud and your fifth grade teacher wants your math trophy back.
It isn't about math in any case, moron. As a math expert you'd know that it's about the principles behind. But then you have no idea what that even MEANS. Like the Golden Mean...you have no idea what it is, let alone what it MEANS.
You're a ranter who hates being shown how ignorant you truly are. Who attacks knowledge they've yet to find? No sane person.
I should study Christianity? ROFL I've done that in spades and also the various theologies and histories involved so as to not be confused like you.
What's the difference between a gnostic and agnostic christian again? Go ahead. Tell me. You've studied Christianity right? The origin of the word Christos...you studied that, huh. LOL You mean that book that defines early Christian symbolism that you won't touch....like that? Learning isn't what you think it is, apparently. Learning isn't confirming one's own accepted errors and lies without being able to prove, nor is it insults and avoidance of actual topics while projecting that same thing onto others. You give platitudes. Bad ones.
What are the angels names, oh wise one, and how did they receive them. You don't know. What is the Golden Mean? You don't know. What connects musical notes with the divine ratios? You don't know. Do YOU have a room full of books on comparitive theologies? Philosophies? Metaphysics? Histories of the religions, both orthodox and 'secret'? You're afraid of books, so I know the answer. Books aren't evil or good are they?
Information within and ability to discern it determines what a book is worth and that's information and discernment that you're lacking. Not me. I present it.....you deny without looking in order to show our relative positions as teacher and failed student.
You project like a bitch. Pearls to swine who won't even LOOK in their dish being handed to them, but wallow in the mud, and call it expertise. You show me your aptitude whether you know it or not and it's both comical and depressing how idiots like you can pretend to know things and think they've won a prize.
You're a pigeon on a chessboard, knocking over pieces and crowing a victory. If you attempted this shit with me in preson, in the past I would have dealt with you in another way that I'm sure you're also really bad at handling. I don't have time to hang around the playpen, fren. Get one more P.O.S. joke claim in so I can block you for being the mental midget you are.
Thanks for playing - with your food.
Okay now.....off the top of your pointy '"I'm a math expert' head.......what's Divine Geometry?
What makes it DIVINE? The future belongs to those who understand things.
You embarrass yourself not me.
See Theoria Apophasis on Youtube for metaphysical theologic information. What's YOUR theory about 'the light of the world'? Well just sit there in the dark then and project the light. That seems to be your method. Try harder.
Just the usual emotional response that an unbalanced individual can only deliver... If you know so much wisdom, why don't you act wise, but as an angry child?
I already destroyed every single "argument" you attempted against me. You couldn't defend your statement, so you lost. It's over. Deal with it. You don't get to make new arguments anymore. I have given you more than enough opportunities to make sense, which you wasted to make insults. It only proves my point further that you, as a believer of a satanic religion, act like the devil. :)
I'm not even reading all that, I read some insults, than more insults, than even more insults... :D How angry are you? Even if you destroyed my arguments, which you didn't, I wouldn't display such uncontrolled anger... :D What does that tell about you, do you know? That you are unbalanced, arrogant, and ignorant. Textbook psychology. Frankly, you shouldn't even be around normal people, as unbalanced as you are...
...............................
I usually go for breaking of the baseless arguments you usually present, but since none are found now, I would like to take the time to quote every single insult you attempted to throw my way, not knowing that my background allows me to withstand the worst words you can throw at me, so I can never stoop to your level. As you can see, I never insulted you. And if you think any qualification about you, that I have said, is incorrect, I will show you know specifically how everything I said about you is correct. :D
[Sorry, I was forced to read this nonsense first "5,000 is the area of the 'magic square' used in the calculation" :D No, it isn't. 5,041 is the closest square to 5,000, the one before it is 4900... Simple math... :D If 5000 is a square, then the side should be 70.71067811865............. Absurd, even for your standards, but I've got to say, they go drastically lower with every new reply from you.]
Anyway, after your imaginary math... :D still funny... Let's continue with quoting your insults towards me:
"You're just a childish liar "
Really? You think a child lies like this? :D WINNER!
"I don't have time for children whining in place of discussion of subjects you avoid"
Must be really hard for you to face that mirror, right? :D WINNER!
Losers don't read let alone understand.
Ironic. WINNER!
"So you're a math expert who cries and avoids a book that uses math as theological proofs."
Compared to you, a simple calculator is a god. WINNER!
"Why don't you take up acting? ROFL You're a math expert now. I can't get over that. You've just made my day !!"
Yeah, it shows. If that's you on a good day, I fear what's like for your close ones to meet you on a bad day... WINNER!
"Off the top of your pointy head, what's the square root of 2? Top of your little math expert head, what is it? You mean, your 'expertise' in a 'contest' in 5th grade didn't allow you to answer without help?"
The meltdown continues... :D If I have to calculate it on the spot, I need to calculate the closest numbers to get as close as 2. 1.4 squared is 1.96, which is very close, so next I will go with 1.41 and continue to get to the closest value. It's a math thing, you wouldn't get it. ANOTHER WINNER!
""Experts" I read about them all day, every day in the press. You must be one because you have NO idea wtf you're pretending to talk about."
Then you should probably learn something if you read it all day... One important thing to read is the Dunning–Kruger effect, where idiots think they are smart, while smart people don't give themselves enough credit, because they know what they don't know. YET ANOTHER WINNER!
"I came to one actual expert on certain subjects by looking for another soul who might understand the formula 1 over phi to the power of negative 3. One. One person on social media channels understood and had posts about it. It was you was it? Being the expert. Please help me out here and expound on the formula. Wait, you're going to have to learn what phi is first. It's all in that book....that you read and can critique. I mean.....you read it right?....."
That's a classic straw-man argument, which is a logical fallacy. I don't have to know anything of yours, if you know it, you have to explain it. It's called "a burden of proof". And phi is the Greek letter denoting the golden ratio in mathematics. I should know, I did a presentation in Athens about it in 11th grade. :D That's in Greece btw. :D WINNER!
Additionally, the golden ratio is not created through multiplication, or on the negative power of 3, since it's the ratio of the sequence of numbers of Fibonacci, which are created only by addition, no multiplication. Here's a good video about it - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=me6Dnl2DOtM Your "expert" is no expert at all.
Yet. Another. WINNER!
"Do you accuse people who refer you to the bible of just trying to promote a book? Why not?"
No clue what you're trying to say here... VOID!
"You've not allowed a discussion of POINTS referred TO in the book. NONE. ZERO. You didn't read. You didn't attempt. You're a fraud and your fifth grade teacher wants your math trophy back."
I have no clue what you're saying here. Also, every good mathematician has tons of "trophies"... I spoke about an international competition to shame you, not to boast myself. :D I have so many 1st places in local competitions that I don't even care about... But you want to play it on arrogance, and in this field, there's always a bigger fish... Another of your comments that makes you the... drum roll... WINNER! :D
"It isn't about math in any case, moron."
You turned the discussion towards math. If there's a moron, should be the one that bails on their own topic... :D ANOTHER WINNER!
"As a math expert you'd know that it's about the principles behind."
Yup. Every "math expert" knows that mathematics is the principles behind every other science. :) I grow tired of mocking you, but here it comes... Your comment is... ANOTHER WINNER! :D (Ok, it is slightly entertaining)
"But then you have no idea what that even MEANS. Like the Golden Mean...you have no idea what it is, let alone what it MEANS."
I know exactly what it means. Fake boasting from an angry individual, who is too arrogant to admit defeat. Yeah, I got into advanced psychology in 6th grade... It's just funny to hit me in places that never hurt :D Another big win for you... or should I say... WINNER!
"You're a ranter who hates being shown how ignorant you truly are. Who attacks knowledge they've yet to find? No sane person."
I responded to every argument from you with a proof that you are wrong. You're talking about yourself here. Which makes you the... WINNER!
"I should study Christianity? ROFL I've done that in spades and also the various theologies and histories involved so as to not be confused like you."
Really? Then why couldn't you defend any argument against Christianity that you made? :( "IXOYE (often misread as IHEOYE due to how the Greek letters look in English fonts)" - Remember how I disproved your argument on that? :D Must be another... WINNER!
....................
I am bored now. But in general, your comment continues in the same trait. Empty accusations, insults, projecting, fear and avoidance, when I argue against your topics. Same old, same old.
But I did save the best for last. Your starting statement:
OMG
Tell me. Who is "your god" that you call for in this statement? :D Must be a tiny one that makes you into a meltdown laughing stock... Even the one person upvoting you (op probably) forgot about you... :D
I have destroyed so many others like you. The very fact that you already dodged all the topics that I exposed you as a liar, is a proof that you're not worthy for a good debate, not even a discussion. You anger and insults make everyone reading this cringe to their core, and they will never follow your example. You're alone in your meltdown. Even rats flee a burning ship.
I usually debate smarter people than you, but it's nice to know that the worst of the worst can't take me down with their tiny insults. It's a sport for me, I like to stay in shape. Also, the LORD commands us to defend our faith, but as a person trying to be a Christian, I do my best, which is not nearly what God wants probably... But I try. I find comfort in winning against pawns that act childish like that. Well, you wrote this unironically:
That's not a site for gematria. I used an actual site tho, and your argument doesn't help you in any way. Just shows that you're pushing for this book, while you can't give any good argument from it, which I haven't demolished already.
Also, I am not falling for the multiple comments scenario, where you want to divert the topic in 2, or more comment chains. I can contain my reply in a single comment, can you?
So, as usual, I will be ignoring most of your fake insults and fake boasting, while this would be the reply to your 2nd comment, since you can't follow a simple comment chain, unfortunately.
It is gematria. Gematrix is the biggest site on that, or one of the biggest. If you don't believe it, count the numbers yourself.
Plain wrong. :D I already sent the wiki link, but here it is again - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeshua#Original_name_for_Jesus (Notice the name of the paragraph - "Original name of Jesus". I just like it that you literally quoted it in your statement. Irony abounds.)
That doesn't follow. A theoretical satanism, without the rituals, is still satanism.
How so? You previously assumed I didn't know anything about the age of whatever, then I showed you the source + the name of her works includes Lucifer - the devil from... drum roll... The Bible. Hello?
You don't get to reinterpret ancient knowledge. Before you were born, and before Helena Blavatsky was born, Lucifer was the name for the devil. You choose to attribute the devil's name to whatever you want. Doesn't change the fact that you both follow a satanic ideology. And you both seem to like the ancient name of the devil. Why not call it another name? Because demons are called with their name... Don't you know the saying? "Speak of the devil, and he shall appear" Classic satanism.
:D How are they one against another? I don't know how it would make you laugh, I am laughing already... :D Your tirades are hilarious, I gotta admit. :D
Hey, they both have eyes... Perhaps they are the same... :D Wait, they both have heads too?! Wait a minute... :D The term "morning star" means HOPE. A light that shines in the morning (time of mourning). It's not a hard concept, and it's not an actual light in the sky... :D It's ironic that you accuse me of being literal, while that's what you're doing.. :D You make me laugh... be serious, I struggle to put forth arguments when you make me laugh so much... :D
Indeed, count me out of your satanism and any kind of satanism.
Sure, sure.. It just so happens that I am a mathematician and when winning in international competitions, the US team was comprised by 3 Chinese kids and an Indian kid... Imagine that... :D Your boasting only makes me laugh... :D
How so? Your sources are only confirmed satanists. You even quoted crowley on his tarot bs. :D
A lot of gibberish this time from you... Very weak arguments. You're not even responding to my challenges. I'll take it as you've lost the argument and now being angry due to it... I hope you don't lose your mind tho...
Anyway... This discussion has been... well, terrible, not gonna sugarcoat it. You can't control your emotions for a simple discussion on theology. You present many of the traits of someone losing an argument, while they can't deal with it - dodging topics, insulting, mocking, can't stay on point, can't deliver proof of his own claims, etc., etc. This has gone beyond a rational discussion, which only shows that the satanic rage couldn't win against heaven, surely, it can't win against someone trying to be a Christian. Weak argumentation, or non-existent.
In conclusion, this has been educational for me, in the least of ways. I usually debate people of higher intellect, so when I lose an argument, I feel that I won knowledge at least. With you is just more insults and empty boasting... As much as I like to see a meltdown, I think we should end it here. I've given you more than reasonably sufficient opportunities to defend your argument, and you couldn't. If your emotions control you, then don't control me... So we can't converse on the same level, thankfully!
Anyway, research more, do better! All the best!
OMG As previously stated, demonstrated in the book, and ignored....Three circles are the traditional three dimensional 'worlds' you know nothing of except as an anthropromorphic 'trinity'.
So in the 'three worlds', they intersect and their intersection as three circles for reasons you know nothing about......they create two Vesica Pisces - 2 FISHES. Vescia Pisces. You know.......c'mon, you're the expert.....right? Right? 5,000 is the area of the 'magic square' used in the calculation. The formula is proof that the story was fashioned to fit the formula......NOT.....the other way around. Which is a very important point that remains hidden to 'the profane', the '99', the 'babes in christ'. et al. When I was a child, I spake as a child. Time to put on the big boy pants and learn things.
You're just a childish liar and I don't have time for children whining in place of discussion of subjects you avoid.....every....single.....time. Suddenly avoidance is expertise huh? Losers don't read let alone understand.
So you're a math expert who cries and avoids a book that uses math as theological proofs. Why don't you take up acting? ROFL You're a math expert now. I can't get over that. You've just made my day !!
Off the top of your pointy head, what's the square root of 2? Top of your little math expert head, what is it? You mean, your 'expertise' in a 'contest' in 5th grade didn't allow you to answer without help?
"Experts" I read about them all day, every day in the press. You must be one because you have NO idea wtf you're pretending to talk about.
I came to one actual expert on certain subjects by looking for another soul who might understand the formula 1 over phi to the power of negative 3. One. One person on social media channels understood and had posts about it. It was you was it? Being the expert. Please help me out here and expound on the formula. Wait, you're going to have to learn what phi is first. It's all in that book....that you read and can critique. I mean.....you read it right?.....
Do you accuse people who refer you to the bible of just trying to promote a book? Why not?
You've not allowed a discussion of POINTS referred TO in the book. NONE. ZERO. You didn't read. You didn't attempt. You're a fraud and your fifth grade teacher wants your math trophy back.
It isn't about math in any case, moron. As a math expert you'd know that it's about the principles behind. But then you have no idea what that even MEANS. Like the Golden Mean...you have no idea what it is, let alone what it MEANS.
You're a ranter who hates being shown how ignorant you truly are. Who attacks knowledge they've yet to find? No sane person.
I should study Christianity? ROFL I've done that in spades and also the various theologies and histories involved so as to not be confused like you.
What's the difference between a gnostic and agnostic christian again? Go ahead. Tell me. You've studied Christianity right? The origin of the word Christos...you studied that, huh. LOL You mean that book that defines early Christian symbolism that you won't touch....like that? Learning isn't what you think it is, apparently. Learning isn't confirming one's own accepted errors and lies without being able to prove, nor is it insults and avoidance of actual topics while projecting that same thing onto others. You give platitudes. Bad ones.
What are the angels names, oh wise one, and how did they receive them. You don't know. What is the Golden Mean? You don't know. What connects musical notes with the divine ratios? You don't know. Do YOU have a room full of books on comparitive theologies? Philosophies? Metaphysics? Histories of the religions, both orthodox and 'secret'? You're afraid of books, so I know the answer. Books aren't evil or good are they? Information within and ability to discern it determines what a book is worth and that's information and discernment that you're lacking. Not me. I present it.....you deny without looking in order to show our relative positions as teacher and failed student.
You project like a bitch. Pearls to swine who won't even LOOK in their dish being handed to them, but wallow in the mud, and call it expertise. You show me your aptitude whether you know it or not and it's both comical and depressing how idiots like you can pretend to know things and think they've won a prize. You're a pigeon on a chessboard, knocking over pieces and crowing a victory. If you attempted this shit with me in preson, in the past I would have dealt with you in another way that I'm sure you're also really bad at handling. I don't have time to hang around the playpen, fren. Get one more P.O.S. joke claim in so I can block you for being the mental midget you are. Thanks for playing - with your food.
Okay now.....off the top of your pointy '"I'm a math expert' head.......what's Divine Geometry?
What makes it DIVINE? The future belongs to those who understand things.
You embarrass yourself not me.
See Theoria Apophasis on Youtube for metaphysical theologic information. What's YOUR theory about 'the light of the world'? Well just sit there in the dark then and project the light. That seems to be your method. Try harder.
Just the usual emotional response that an unbalanced individual can only deliver... If you know so much wisdom, why don't you act wise, but as an angry child?
I already destroyed every single "argument" you attempted against me. You couldn't defend your statement, so you lost. It's over. Deal with it. You don't get to make new arguments anymore. I have given you more than enough opportunities to make sense, which you wasted to make insults. It only proves my point further that you, as a believer of a satanic religion, act like the devil. :)
I'm not even reading all that, I read some insults, than more insults, than even more insults... :D How angry are you? Even if you destroyed my arguments, which you didn't, I wouldn't display such uncontrolled anger... :D What does that tell about you, do you know? That you are unbalanced, arrogant, and ignorant. Textbook psychology. Frankly, you shouldn't even be around normal people, as unbalanced as you are...
...............................
I usually go for breaking of the baseless arguments you usually present, but since none are found now, I would like to take the time to quote every single insult you attempted to throw my way, not knowing that my background allows me to withstand the worst words you can throw at me, so I can never stoop to your level. As you can see, I never insulted you. And if you think any qualification about you, that I have said, is incorrect, I will show you know specifically how everything I said about you is correct. :D
Anyway, after your imaginary math... :D still funny... Let's continue with quoting your insults towards me:
Really? You think a child lies like this? :D WINNER!
Must be really hard for you to face that mirror, right? :D WINNER!
Ironic. WINNER!
Compared to you, a simple calculator is a god. WINNER!
Yeah, it shows. If that's you on a good day, I fear what's like for your close ones to meet you on a bad day... WINNER!
The meltdown continues... :D If I have to calculate it on the spot, I need to calculate the closest numbers to get as close as 2. 1.4 squared is 1.96, which is very close, so next I will go with 1.41 and continue to get to the closest value. It's a math thing, you wouldn't get it. ANOTHER WINNER!
Then you should probably learn something if you read it all day... One important thing to read is the Dunning–Kruger effect, where idiots think they are smart, while smart people don't give themselves enough credit, because they know what they don't know. YET ANOTHER WINNER!
That's a classic straw-man argument, which is a logical fallacy. I don't have to know anything of yours, if you know it, you have to explain it. It's called "a burden of proof". And phi is the Greek letter denoting the golden ratio in mathematics. I should know, I did a presentation in Athens about it in 11th grade. :D That's in Greece btw. :D WINNER!
Additionally, the golden ratio is not created through multiplication, or on the negative power of 3, since it's the ratio of the sequence of numbers of Fibonacci, which are created only by addition, no multiplication. Here's a good video about it - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=me6Dnl2DOtM Your "expert" is no expert at all.
Yet. Another. WINNER!
No clue what you're trying to say here... VOID!
I have no clue what you're saying here. Also, every good mathematician has tons of "trophies"... I spoke about an international competition to shame you, not to boast myself. :D I have so many 1st places in local competitions that I don't even care about... But you want to play it on arrogance, and in this field, there's always a bigger fish... Another of your comments that makes you the... drum roll... WINNER! :D
You turned the discussion towards math. If there's a moron, should be the one that bails on their own topic... :D ANOTHER WINNER!
Yup. Every "math expert" knows that mathematics is the principles behind every other science. :) I grow tired of mocking you, but here it comes... Your comment is... ANOTHER WINNER! :D (Ok, it is slightly entertaining)
I know exactly what it means. Fake boasting from an angry individual, who is too arrogant to admit defeat. Yeah, I got into advanced psychology in 6th grade... It's just funny to hit me in places that never hurt :D Another big win for you... or should I say... WINNER!
I responded to every argument from you with a proof that you are wrong. You're talking about yourself here. Which makes you the... WINNER!
Really? Then why couldn't you defend any argument against Christianity that you made? :( "IXOYE (often misread as IHEOYE due to how the Greek letters look in English fonts)" - Remember how I disproved your argument on that? :D Must be another... WINNER!
....................
I am bored now. But in general, your comment continues in the same trait. Empty accusations, insults, projecting, fear and avoidance, when I argue against your topics. Same old, same old.
But I did save the best for last. Your starting statement:
Tell me. Who is "your god" that you call for in this statement? :D Must be a tiny one that makes you into a meltdown laughing stock... Even the one person upvoting you (op probably) forgot about you... :D
I have destroyed so many others like you. The very fact that you already dodged all the topics that I exposed you as a liar, is a proof that you're not worthy for a good debate, not even a discussion. You anger and insults make everyone reading this cringe to their core, and they will never follow your example. You're alone in your meltdown. Even rats flee a burning ship.
I usually debate smarter people than you, but it's nice to know that the worst of the worst can't take me down with their tiny insults. It's a sport for me, I like to stay in shape. Also, the LORD commands us to defend our faith, but as a person trying to be a Christian, I do my best, which is not nearly what God wants probably... But I try. I find comfort in winning against pawns that act childish like that. Well, you wrote this unironically:
Must be another... WINNER! :D
All the best. See you on your next meltdown.