Platitudes ABOUT knowledge is not knowledge. It doesn't relay knowledge. A platitude is a pretense of wisdom, not actual information that might prove or disprove. I offer information as proof, you offer platitudes. I hope you can grasp the difference and go back and confirm for yourself if you need it.
0 Facts. That's a zero. It didn't exist in every numeric system. Somehow, certain primitives never 'got' the concept, just as most modern man doesn't truly appreciate the difference between 1 and 0 while depending on it daily.
Knowledge sure is relevant. So are the words 'research' and 'study' and 'lifelong'. Statements show position to the ascendant party every single time. You don't have the tools my fren, bow out gracefully now or risk getting red-pilled with a plethora of things you never knew. That to a real truth seeker, would be read as a positive invitation worth investigating.
As per your quote: "Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can."
Okay. So you teach that books don't have pictures and drawings?
Re: My quote "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher."
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of the current subject. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like the coat that Joseph got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology, separated him from his courser literalistic brothers and allowed him to interpret the Pharoah's dreams (see psychology)
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why?
Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888?
Why and how did Clement know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic.
Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here. How did the gods and numbers and letters all get their names and how and why do they inter-correspond with ideation? What are the angels and daemons names and why is it the same with them? What's up with that?
Early Christian gnostics who saw the city's temple priests as Hellenic overseer usurpers of the priesthood and literalists as 'seekers after smooth things', the people who could write and did write the laws on copper scrolls, referred to Jesus as/ 'the plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called."
The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also.
And so one of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more :)...... and one was not.
Read the little pdf file, as OG lifelong researcher.....and discover things you never knew or maybe can even imagine.
Try harder, you can get there. I would have never put it like that, but you did it first as a false pretense.
Oh, one more thing. I don't subscribe as 'A gnostic' as I'm not limited to that theology's cultural expression. Not knowing which 'bucket' to ad hoc a person into, you're forced to address issues.....with informational answers to questions.....but won't, because you don't know them, and refuse to go find. Seek and ye shall find. Leave the 99 to find the One as completion.
I'm just going to ignore the boasting and insults from you.
Okay. So you teach that books don't have pictures and drawings?
Are you suggesting that pictures/drawings are better than a video. Because they are not.
Nope. One book doesn't make anyone a teacher.
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of the current subject. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
Incorrect. Your entire first paragraph is exactly what I was talking about. That's why I am ignoring it.
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language
Where do you get that from? Can you provide a source to your claims?
The only thing I find is this: "IXOYE (often misread as IHEOYE due to how the Greek letters look in English fonts), which is an ancient Christian acronym. Written in capital Greek letters as ΙΧΘΥΣ (Ichthys), it literally translates to the word "fish."" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ichthys (There is even a picture of it written in stone, so you can see the proper writing is not what you provided)
But if you think there's a pre-Christian era source, I'd love to see it. Or did you just read it from a book and didn't research the proper origins?
How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here.
That's super easy. https://www.gematrix.org/?word=888 (Here are several examples of how common is to adjust certain words to create a number in gematria, especially 888)
Here's the actual name of Jesus - Yeshua, and it doesn't make 888, neither in Hebrew, English, or simple gematria - https://www.gematrix.org/?word=yeshua
Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters...
Let me know if you need help with anything else. So far, your entire belief system is incorrect. Using gematria as evidence is so far fetched, as I provided you with so many example of 888... It's like looking for your theory to only match the evidence, while it's actually the evidence that should be used to form a theory.
I thought an entire book will provide more arguments for you, but it's surprising how easy is to debunk all of your current claims. Perhaps you need to read that book of yours again...
Anyway, let me know if you need help with anything else. I'll be happy to help you!
Gematria isn't numerology. You attempted to use new age numerology to disprove gematria and you went to your mentor, wikipedia or google to find your prize.
It doesn't accomplish your goal. Numerology is a cheap imitation of gematria. It doesn't work that way....randomly choosing words to create a sum, but you'd know that if you weren't willfully iignorant about it.
Today I learned that Yeshua has 4 letters. Count much?
You sure his name isn't 'Jesus'....the hispanic spelling? How about Emmanuel?
I'm trying to teach you how to count and how to spell, but you insist on playing baby games instead.
I've had a saying for decades. It goes, "Who's 'fish' Ichthys?
Answer by telling me why the fish is used as symbol and I'll bury you with the details in an ACTUAL answer that escapes you and is in that scary, intimidating pdf file you're afraid to look at.
What is the vesica pisces? A fish? Learn things. Let me know what else I can help you with.
Jesus divides the two fish among the 5000, and this is represented by drawing three perfectly interpenetrating circles, thus forming "the three worlds diagram" of Hellenistic cosmology. This gives rise to two "fish" or vesica pisces forms in the square of 5000. Each vesica has a horizonal axis which measures 61.2 units in length; together they
measure 122.4 units, and 1224 is the gematria value of the Greek
word FISHES. Each one of the circles has a circumference of 2 22 units, and each vesica therefore has a perimeter of 148.0 units. 1480 is the value of CHRISTOS, and the "vessel of the fish" was an early emblem of his nature. The perimeter of the square measures 282 units, and 282 is the value of the Greek word BIOS, Life, an important aspect of the Universal Logos
In terms of the vertical dimensions, length AB is HERMES, AC is THE God HERMES,
AD is APOLLO, and AE is THE God APOLLO.
This is one small section of the explanation that also includes the 'net', the 5,000,
the 'loaves' and so on, interpreting each according to their divine meaning.
In other words, the story is based upon the pre-Christian canon of Greek theology.
and contains gematria and its associated divine geometry as proofs to the learned, .........not the profane 'seekers after smooth things'.
'Jesus' was said to usher the Age of Pisces. This is the Age of Aquarius.
Aquarius is 'a new outpouring'. But you knew that too, huh.
This is a piece of 'Divine Geometry', as is Q/17 as Divine Inspiration that you lack to interpret or even make the move to discover. The profane won't get the significance. So Team Q knows all about these systems and use it to great success. It was a requirement to be on the team. Knowing things matters, and so the Cicada 3301 separated the wheat from the chaff to create Team Q who acts a surrogate savior until 'the one' becomes the Optic (5:5).
It isn't false because a particular literalist can't decode a commode.
Let me know how else I can raise your consciousness and redpill you on false literal theology while providing the actual information meant to be conveyed. When I was a child, I also spoke as a child. It's already past the time for all literalists to put on the bigboy pants and man up to theology rather than dogma. 'Bad Religion' is exactly how we got here.
You can address me as Elisha or Elijah as each represents the same spirit in a different age.
Gematria isn't numerology. You attempted to use new age numerology to disprove gematria and you went to your mentor, wikipedia or google to find your prize. It doesn't accomplish your goal. Numerology is a cheap imitation of gematria. It doesn't work that way....randomly choosing words to create a sum, but you'd know that if you weren't willfully iignorant about it.
It's an official site for gematria, what are you talking about? What site are you using, and let's compare the data. Absolute non-argument there... Pass.
Today I learned that Yeshua has 4 letters. Count much? You sure his name isn't 'Jesus'....the hispanic spelling? How about Emmanuel? I'm trying to teach you how to count and how to spell, but you insist on playing baby games instead.
Empty accusations and insults... Are you incapable of having a normal discussion? Didn't you want that initially instead of a debate? No wonder you can't have it, since you act like that...
Anyway, Yeshua is a jewish name and has 4 letters. It's the original name of Jesus. Therefore, if gematria should correctly work to find out a numerical value of a name, it logically should be the original name in the original language.
If you don't have any arguments against this, you don't have to continue with petty insults again.
Answer by telling me why the fish is used as symbol and I'll bury you with the details in an ACTUAL answer that escapes you and is in that scary, intimidating pdf file you're afraid to look at.
Nice discussion techniques from you. :D I see this as boasting, personally, but it might be just me.
Jesus divides the two fish among the 5000...
First of all, 3 circles is not 2 fishes. Also, where is the 5000 in this incredible math problem? When I was little, I had a big digital clock in front of me near my bed. It was a funny exercise for me to think of any number and use the digits from the clock to somehow produce it. No magic there, just enough time to adjust the numbers and there you go - you can always produce a random number with any 4 digits (mostly). To contest this incredible math, why not use the radius? We are talking circles, where is Pi in all this?
Btw, did you know that on another occasion Jesus fed 4000 with few loafs of bread, and a few fishes? (Matthew 15:32-39), (Mark 8:1-9)
I wonder how these incredible math skills will apply for the 2nd case, where the number of fish is not specified...
In other words, the story is based upon the pre-Christian canon of Greek theology. and contains gematria and its associated divine geometry as proofs to the learned, .........not the profane 'seekers after smooth things'.
Hey, you wouldn't believe what someone wrote to me about this very situation:
"Platitudes ABOUT knowledge is not knowledge"
Nice, and ironic. I love this type of humor, I can't help it. Hope you don't mind.
'Jesus' was said to usher the Age of Pisces. This is the Age of Aquarius. Aquarius is 'a new outpouring'. But you knew that too, huh.
And you'd be interested to know that the same liar and occultist believes in a god from the Bible called Lucifer... Doesn't that remind you of something that I said earlier? That all these religions are satanic? Source: https://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/hpb-sio/sio-hp.htm Notice the title "A Collection of Articles from Lucifer, H. P. Blavatsky's magazine, between 1887-1891"
And you continue with more boasting and insults, ignored again.
................
As you can read, I provided sources for my knowledge and conclusions. Specifically, your knowledge is based on a satanist, and such people are described in the Bible perfectly well, and you display the same traits of such people. I, on the other hand, showed you that your source is satanic in origin from her own publishing site + the original name of her own book.
Let me remind you how this conversation even started. I said all these religions are satanic, you attempted to refute that by going directly to a satanist. If the obvious is not clear yet - you confirmed my initial statement with your own sources.
I'd be happy to help you even further to learn the truth about your own sources, even though you act in such a difficult manner. Nobody likes their arguments to be exposed as false, but you decide how to act afterwards.
"It's an official site for gematria, what are you talking about? What site are you using, and let's compare the data
Uh......you know......that SOURCE I gave you from the get-go. THAT source.
So is it that you can't actually read or are just afraid of being shown your comparative ignorance?
Re: "It's an official site for gematria, what are you talking about? What site are you using, and let's compare the data. Absolute non-argument there... Pass."
There is no 'official site for gematria' fool. And that isn't gematria. Absolute ignorance.
Yeshua is NOT an 'original name of Jesus' and you don't 'get' what is behind gematria in the first place, so you're the last to determine 'worth'.
You said 'All these religions are satanic" and I said 'All religions that use magic ritual are satanic'. There are truths in all theologies that escape you, and every theology is eventually turned into anthropromorphic literalized ritual magic religion....instead. "The church becomes the whore." as the roman catholic bible clearly confesses. An Elisha/Elijah corrects and upbraids by showing error and correction...and is seen as the enemy...every......single.....time.
Today I learn that the ancient study of the movement of the heavens and mentioned in a myriad of ways in 'the bible' was invented by Helena Blavatsky.
You read Helena Blavatsky's work, or did you let a third party dictate to you?
Either way, your statement is trash. Aquarius as new outpouring is exactly what is going on here, but you wouldn't know that, being ignorant of the subject.
YOU believe in a god named Lucifer. It's in the bible remember? So your bible believes in the god Lucifer. I wonder what the name Lucifer could mean. I wonder why he goes under several 'names' that count out as meaning under gematria, but you don't know that. Lucifer is material knowledge. Material knowledge by itself is profane. Hell, you don't even qualify for that....let alone the ability to discern that knowledge aka wisdom.
Blavatsky, Crowley, Mathers, Guirdjieff, et al.....were requisitioned by the cabal to do deep dive research into matters they didn't have time, energy or ability to discover. With agendas behind. Even though they are the grand poobah wizards of the cabal, they misunderstand and misrepresent much in their writings. Crowley showed the cabal that they had been fooled in the past into misreading the deck of tarot because the 'Star' card had been swapped with 'Tzaddi'. You know what the means? No you don't. First it means the the magick is weak on the dark side at this time as they give over to technology. Q is the movement to RECLAIM what has been STOLEN, including esoteric understanding. Q IS 'The Star'...as 17....Divine Inspiration.....and since it had been switched, the cabal was practicing bad 'magick' aka Satanism which is also a slightly different practice from Luciferianism.
It pays to actually know/gno thine enemy. But you don't. You fear and avoid the principles they abuse. You don't get to throw me into your would-be ad hoc bucket by trying to tag ME as one I correct, and warn against.
You, as a literalist practitioner of magic are more closely akin to the Satanist and Satan is a Christian god by definition and circumstance. Both Lucifer and Jesus are said to be the 'Morning Star'......explain. No....don't even try, it'll make me laugh.
Yes you provided 'sources'......links........to 'satanic sources' LOL. You must be a satanist. Did you read them? Hell NO you didn't, you fraud.
Now you learn that 17 is The Star, not to be confused with Tsaddi, neither of which you understand...and so you don't really belong in the movement of Q/17/The Star.....as you reject the new outpouring of eternal truths.
This is like discussing Calculus with a five year old.
So I'll continue to redpill you with information and you can continue with sheer denial of something unknown, while pretending, so we can show our proper positions. Bad religion is how we got here. Raise it up to the eternal principles and you'll experience a Great Awakening instead.
Platitudes ABOUT knowledge is not knowledge. It doesn't relay knowledge. A platitude is a pretense of wisdom, not actual information that might prove or disprove. I offer information as proof, you offer platitudes. I hope you can grasp the difference and go back and confirm for yourself if you need it. 0 Facts. That's a zero. It didn't exist in every numeric system. Somehow, certain primitives never 'got' the concept, just as most modern man doesn't truly appreciate the difference between 1 and 0 while depending on it daily. Knowledge sure is relevant. So are the words 'research' and 'study' and 'lifelong'. Statements show position to the ascendant party every single time. You don't have the tools my fren, bow out gracefully now or risk getting red-pilled with a plethora of things you never knew. That to a real truth seeker, would be read as a positive invitation worth investigating.
As per your quote: "Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can."
Okay. So you teach that books don't have pictures and drawings?
Re: My quote "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher."
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of the current subject. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like the coat that Joseph got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology, separated him from his courser literalistic brothers and allowed him to interpret the Pharoah's dreams (see psychology)
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why? Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888? Why and how did Clement know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic. Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here. How did the gods and numbers and letters all get their names and how and why do they inter-correspond with ideation? What are the angels and daemons names and why is it the same with them? What's up with that?
Early Christian gnostics who saw the city's temple priests as Hellenic overseer usurpers of the priesthood and literalists as 'seekers after smooth things', the people who could write and did write the laws on copper scrolls, referred to Jesus as/ 'the plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called."
The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also.
And so one of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more :)...... and one was not.
Read the little pdf file, as OG lifelong researcher.....and discover things you never knew or maybe can even imagine.
Try harder, you can get there. I would have never put it like that, but you did it first as a false pretense.
Oh, one more thing. I don't subscribe as 'A gnostic' as I'm not limited to that theology's cultural expression. Not knowing which 'bucket' to ad hoc a person into, you're forced to address issues.....with informational answers to questions.....but won't, because you don't know them, and refuse to go find. Seek and ye shall find. Leave the 99 to find the One as completion.
So be it. Amen = 99/completion
I'm just going to ignore the boasting and insults from you.
Are you suggesting that pictures/drawings are better than a video. Because they are not.
Nope. One book doesn't make anyone a teacher.
Incorrect. Your entire first paragraph is exactly what I was talking about. That's why I am ignoring it.
Where do you get that from? Can you provide a source to your claims?
The only thing I find is this: "IXOYE (often misread as IHEOYE due to how the Greek letters look in English fonts), which is an ancient Christian acronym. Written in capital Greek letters as ΙΧΘΥΣ (Ichthys), it literally translates to the word "fish."" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ichthys (There is even a picture of it written in stone, so you can see the proper writing is not what you provided)
But if you think there's a pre-Christian era source, I'd love to see it. Or did you just read it from a book and didn't research the proper origins?
That's super easy. https://www.gematrix.org/?word=888 (Here are several examples of how common is to adjust certain words to create a number in gematria, especially 888)
Here's the actual name of Jesus - Yeshua, and it doesn't make 888, neither in Hebrew, English, or simple gematria - https://www.gematrix.org/?word=yeshua
No, Yeshua is 4 letters - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeshua
..............
Let me know if you need help with anything else. So far, your entire belief system is incorrect. Using gematria as evidence is so far fetched, as I provided you with so many example of 888... It's like looking for your theory to only match the evidence, while it's actually the evidence that should be used to form a theory.
I thought an entire book will provide more arguments for you, but it's surprising how easy is to debunk all of your current claims. Perhaps you need to read that book of yours again...
Anyway, let me know if you need help with anything else. I'll be happy to help you!
Gematria isn't numerology. You attempted to use new age numerology to disprove gematria and you went to your mentor, wikipedia or google to find your prize. It doesn't accomplish your goal. Numerology is a cheap imitation of gematria. It doesn't work that way....randomly choosing words to create a sum, but you'd know that if you weren't willfully iignorant about it.
Today I learned that Yeshua has 4 letters. Count much? You sure his name isn't 'Jesus'....the hispanic spelling? How about Emmanuel? I'm trying to teach you how to count and how to spell, but you insist on playing baby games instead.
I've had a saying for decades. It goes, "Who's 'fish' Ichthys?
Answer by telling me why the fish is used as symbol and I'll bury you with the details in an ACTUAL answer that escapes you and is in that scary, intimidating pdf file you're afraid to look at.
What is the vesica pisces? A fish? Learn things. Let me know what else I can help you with.
Jesus divides the two fish among the 5000, and this is represented by drawing three perfectly interpenetrating circles, thus forming "the three worlds diagram" of Hellenistic cosmology. This gives rise to two "fish" or vesica pisces forms in the square of 5000. Each vesica has a horizonal axis which measures 61.2 units in length; together they measure 122.4 units, and 1224 is the gematria value of the Greek word FISHES. Each one of the circles has a circumference of 2 22 units, and each vesica therefore has a perimeter of 148.0 units. 1480 is the value of CHRISTOS, and the "vessel of the fish" was an early emblem of his nature. The perimeter of the square measures 282 units, and 282 is the value of the Greek word BIOS, Life, an important aspect of the Universal Logos In terms of the vertical dimensions, length AB is HERMES, AC is THE God HERMES, AD is APOLLO, and AE is THE God APOLLO. This is one small section of the explanation that also includes the 'net', the 5,000, the 'loaves' and so on, interpreting each according to their divine meaning.
In other words, the story is based upon the pre-Christian canon of Greek theology. and contains gematria and its associated divine geometry as proofs to the learned, .........not the profane 'seekers after smooth things'.
'Jesus' was said to usher the Age of Pisces. This is the Age of Aquarius. Aquarius is 'a new outpouring'. But you knew that too, huh.
This is a piece of 'Divine Geometry', as is Q/17 as Divine Inspiration that you lack to interpret or even make the move to discover. The profane won't get the significance. So Team Q knows all about these systems and use it to great success. It was a requirement to be on the team. Knowing things matters, and so the Cicada 3301 separated the wheat from the chaff to create Team Q who acts a surrogate savior until 'the one' becomes the Optic (5:5).
It isn't false because a particular literalist can't decode a commode.
Let me know how else I can raise your consciousness and redpill you on false literal theology while providing the actual information meant to be conveyed. When I was a child, I also spoke as a child. It's already past the time for all literalists to put on the bigboy pants and man up to theology rather than dogma. 'Bad Religion' is exactly how we got here. You can address me as Elisha or Elijah as each represents the same spirit in a different age.
Now throw a another fit with false assumptions.
It's an official site for gematria, what are you talking about? What site are you using, and let's compare the data. Absolute non-argument there... Pass.
Empty accusations and insults... Are you incapable of having a normal discussion? Didn't you want that initially instead of a debate? No wonder you can't have it, since you act like that...
Anyway, Yeshua is a jewish name and has 4 letters. It's the original name of Jesus. Therefore, if gematria should correctly work to find out a numerical value of a name, it logically should be the original name in the original language.
If you don't have any arguments against this, you don't have to continue with petty insults again.
Nice discussion techniques from you. :D I see this as boasting, personally, but it might be just me.
First of all, 3 circles is not 2 fishes. Also, where is the 5000 in this incredible math problem? When I was little, I had a big digital clock in front of me near my bed. It was a funny exercise for me to think of any number and use the digits from the clock to somehow produce it. No magic there, just enough time to adjust the numbers and there you go - you can always produce a random number with any 4 digits (mostly). To contest this incredible math, why not use the radius? We are talking circles, where is Pi in all this?
Btw, did you know that on another occasion Jesus fed 4000 with few loafs of bread, and a few fishes? (Matthew 15:32-39), (Mark 8:1-9)
I wonder how these incredible math skills will apply for the 2nd case, where the number of fish is not specified...
Hey, you wouldn't believe what someone wrote to me about this very situation:
"Platitudes ABOUT knowledge is not knowledge"
Nice, and ironic. I love this type of humor, I can't help it. Hope you don't mind.
Of course I know this. Lies from the occultist Helena Blavatsky. Source - https://www.scribd.com/document/392379645/The-Pistis-Sophia-Lucifer-April-1891
And you'd be interested to know that the same liar and occultist believes in a god from the Bible called Lucifer... Doesn't that remind you of something that I said earlier? That all these religions are satanic? Source: https://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/hpb-sio/sio-hp.htm Notice the title "A Collection of Articles from Lucifer, H. P. Blavatsky's magazine, between 1887-1891"
Another source that also includes the name Lucifer and Blavatsky, confirming that the connection is as intended by H. P. Blavatsky - https://www.amazon.com/Studies-Occultism-Annotated-Collection-Blavatskys/dp/B0C9SDLR32
And you continue with more boasting and insults, ignored again.
................
As you can read, I provided sources for my knowledge and conclusions. Specifically, your knowledge is based on a satanist, and such people are described in the Bible perfectly well, and you display the same traits of such people. I, on the other hand, showed you that your source is satanic in origin from her own publishing site + the original name of her own book.
Let me remind you how this conversation even started. I said all these religions are satanic, you attempted to refute that by going directly to a satanist. If the obvious is not clear yet - you confirmed my initial statement with your own sources.
I'd be happy to help you even further to learn the truth about your own sources, even though you act in such a difficult manner. Nobody likes their arguments to be exposed as false, but you decide how to act afterwards.
"It's an official site for gematria, what are you talking about? What site are you using, and let's compare the data
Uh......you know......that SOURCE I gave you from the get-go. THAT source. So is it that you can't actually read or are just afraid of being shown your comparative ignorance?
Go ahead.....dig in........LOL
https://kupdf.net/download/jesus-christ-sun-of-god-ancient-cosmology-and-early-christian-symbolism-by-david-r-fideler-ocr_58a100e36454a7335db1eb87_pdf
How's the reading coming? You're a fraud. Let me know what else I can help you ignore.
You: "The only thing I find is this: "IXOYE"
You hear the one about the drunk who looks for his keys under the streetlight because there's more light there? You're like that.
That's an insult, not an argument.
Do better.
Re: "It's an official site for gematria, what are you talking about? What site are you using, and let's compare the data. Absolute non-argument there... Pass."
There is no 'official site for gematria' fool. And that isn't gematria. Absolute ignorance.
Yeshua is NOT an 'original name of Jesus' and you don't 'get' what is behind gematria in the first place, so you're the last to determine 'worth'.
You said 'All these religions are satanic" and I said 'All religions that use magic ritual are satanic'. There are truths in all theologies that escape you, and every theology is eventually turned into anthropromorphic literalized ritual magic religion....instead. "The church becomes the whore." as the roman catholic bible clearly confesses. An Elisha/Elijah corrects and upbraids by showing error and correction...and is seen as the enemy...every......single.....time.
Today I learn that the ancient study of the movement of the heavens and mentioned in a myriad of ways in 'the bible' was invented by Helena Blavatsky. You read Helena Blavatsky's work, or did you let a third party dictate to you? Either way, your statement is trash. Aquarius as new outpouring is exactly what is going on here, but you wouldn't know that, being ignorant of the subject.
YOU believe in a god named Lucifer. It's in the bible remember? So your bible believes in the god Lucifer. I wonder what the name Lucifer could mean. I wonder why he goes under several 'names' that count out as meaning under gematria, but you don't know that. Lucifer is material knowledge. Material knowledge by itself is profane. Hell, you don't even qualify for that....let alone the ability to discern that knowledge aka wisdom.
Blavatsky, Crowley, Mathers, Guirdjieff, et al.....were requisitioned by the cabal to do deep dive research into matters they didn't have time, energy or ability to discover. With agendas behind. Even though they are the grand poobah wizards of the cabal, they misunderstand and misrepresent much in their writings. Crowley showed the cabal that they had been fooled in the past into misreading the deck of tarot because the 'Star' card had been swapped with 'Tzaddi'. You know what the means? No you don't. First it means the the magick is weak on the dark side at this time as they give over to technology. Q is the movement to RECLAIM what has been STOLEN, including esoteric understanding. Q IS 'The Star'...as 17....Divine Inspiration.....and since it had been switched, the cabal was practicing bad 'magick' aka Satanism which is also a slightly different practice from Luciferianism. It pays to actually know/gno thine enemy. But you don't. You fear and avoid the principles they abuse. You don't get to throw me into your would-be ad hoc bucket by trying to tag ME as one I correct, and warn against.
You, as a literalist practitioner of magic are more closely akin to the Satanist and Satan is a Christian god by definition and circumstance. Both Lucifer and Jesus are said to be the 'Morning Star'......explain. No....don't even try, it'll make me laugh.
Yes you provided 'sources'......links........to 'satanic sources' LOL. You must be a satanist. Did you read them? Hell NO you didn't, you fraud.
Now you learn that 17 is The Star, not to be confused with Tsaddi, neither of which you understand...and so you don't really belong in the movement of Q/17/The Star.....as you reject the new outpouring of eternal truths.
This is like discussing Calculus with a five year old.
So I'll continue to redpill you with information and you can continue with sheer denial of something unknown, while pretending, so we can show our proper positions. Bad religion is how we got here. Raise it up to the eternal principles and you'll experience a Great Awakening instead.