The thing about the Left is that they always paint themselves into a corner. They flip the rules so often and make so many asinine exemptions that it's more or less easy to sidestep them while also trolling them. That's what happens when you make policy based on "feels" rather than facts.
The thing about the Left is that they always paint themselves into a corner.
What if it's participating within a left vs right circular conflict which permits another to use compass + square to encircle and paint corners?
They (left) flip the rules
What if it's participation within a left vs right circular conflict which keeps flipping the rule/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rule
easy to sidestep
What does sidestepping within a circular conflict (left vs right) imply? Isn't it just changing sides within the same conflict, while running in circles?
feels rather than facts
What if motion (fact) tempts emotion (feel)? What if neither can be held onto without destroying self?
The thing about the Left is that they always paint themselves into a corner. They flip the rules so often and make so many asinine exemptions that it's more or less easy to sidestep them while also trolling them. That's what happens when you make policy based on "feels" rather than facts.
What if it's participating within a left vs right circular conflict which permits another to use compass + square to encircle and paint corners?
What if it's participation within a left vs right circular conflict which keeps flipping the rule/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rule
What does sidestepping within a circular conflict (left vs right) imply? Isn't it just changing sides within the same conflict, while running in circles?
What if motion (fact) tempts emotion (feel)? What if neither can be held onto without destroying self?