A conspiracy forum doesn't need criticism? How is then the mainstream propaganda exposed, if not by critique?

Again, I have no authority, never displayed authority. Criticism is not authority. Authority is having power over another, which I have neither done, nor suggested. I feel puzzled to explain what English words mean to a supposed English speaker. Please, take into consideration that accusing me of things that I have not ever done is false accusation. If I am wrong, please show an example, where I authorize an action against someone else, or enforce power that I do not posses? I have specifically checked the meaning of the word "policing" for that situation, and it shows this: "The act of supervising, controlling, or regulating an industry, activity, or process to ensure rules and standards are met" (I don't read criticism is policing anywhere...)

Of course, people can disagree. But can they really disagree that you chose your own post, with only your own comment, to pin for the people here? Of course, I am not the arbiter of truth, that's why I debate, I contest, I challenge in the search of truth. I would be more than happy to be wrong on any case, because this builds character, it improves knowledge, and opens doors to new knowledge, otherwise hidden by a faulty theory. On the other hand, you try to silence my criticism - "and I have to remind you it's not needed at all". Am I wrong to assume that truth fears no criticism?

The philosopher John Stuart Mill famously wrote, "Truth emerges from the clash of adverse ideas" in his 1859 work On Liberty. Arbiter of truth - no, seeker of truth - yes.