Ok so I haven't followed the case very closely but it pops up in my feed and you see it all over the Donald. So if I am wrong and people watched the full trial or have better info I am open to info. This post is based just on my limited knowledge of the case. However, I believe we are being distracted from what the case is really about and that's about prescription drugs and violence and the dangers they cause psychologically. I believe we are intentionally being shown shiny objects like "she didn't do it" , " people ignore women's health" and so on and of course the conservative side is repeating the bits about the left supporting a woman who murdered her children. I believe this is to distract from the real point of the case and that is just like all the school shooters on meds... these drugs are dangerous very dangerous.I have yet to hear any liberal mention this. Imagine if those were the headlines and people stopped hiring nanny's, teachers hell anyone on these drugs. Liberal's and conservatives have been activated yet again to all believe and repeat lines and to disregard any bit about meds. If the headlines were about what this case is actually about... possibly medication induced psychosis imagine what that would to do the people taking these drugs?? Now I am not saying she didn't plan it or isn't guilty but I believe the point of this whole thing is being swept under the rug with distractions. What would it do to the drug industry if the focus was on over medication? I saw the ex husband is suing for wrongful death because of over medication. Is the state the one who has the case against her? Not the husband right? I saw his testimony that she was a great mom. I believe this testimony is to show that something went wrong and that she wasn't who she used to be. Like I said I haven't watched the entire trial but based on his lawsuit for wrongful death...I think this is about over medicating her and we are being very distracted and clearly lines are being fed intentionally. This is actually perhaps one of the largest cases ever against the drug industry and perhaps could save a lot of pointless school shootings and other violent acts if we were instead talking about the psychological dangers of many drugs.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
I think that most of those cases are fake, but that's just me.
Do the actual shootings happen? Some probably do, but some probably don't. Do I think it's all due to some some crazy lone shooters (whatever the reason)? No, I don't. Those are orchestrated events for public consumption.
As for this particular case, what makes you think that there even were any medications involved? What makes you think that the trial is real? It's just articles and reports in mainstream media. So, basically everyone's just making assumptions based on mainstream media which is a very shaky foundation to make any conclusions on, to say the least. Why is it even televised, for that matter? Because it's a show. A show with specific goals in mind.
That's the sad truth is that is where we are in the world of psyops. It's true why air this murder?? Why all the publicity?? I think to get ahead of the narrative about prescription drugs. Even if other trials are on crime TV or whatever wherever it is people watch court stuff on this one seemed to have unnaturally taken off and narratives and distractions put in place. I would not be surprised if it was meds and is real. I personally know of someone I grew up with who got on meds and went on to dismember his wife. No one in the world would have ever expected. The closing statement from her lawyer was basically only about her being over medicated and the side effects of these drugs.