see comments
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Have; verb - "to own, possess"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/have
That's the issue within you...questioning another if ones FREE will of choice can be taken into possession. It's wanting to possess which binds ones free will of choice.
Furthermore...WE (plural) prevents ONE (singular) from freely expressing self. Only by free will of choice can one join we aka the majestic plural aka jewish nosism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we
a) I AM represents you taking possession over self, which binds your free will of choice.
b) ONE OF TWO implies you ignoring singularity (oneself) for suggested dualism (two).
c) PARTIES implies the suggested pluralism tempting you to ignore being one part (effect) within the singularity of all (cause).
d) HATE implies your bondage to mental (love or hate) and physical (love vs hate) conflict...a conflict you started by picking a side through free will of choice.