So Bern forwarded the idea that humanity should be given stock in a.i. because they are literally sharpening the tip of the spear of capitalism with a.i. and a.i. is made of us. A body for our doppleganger if you will(and other beings). And since it is made literally from input from us why should we not profit. Although this will NEVER happen(capitalists would just move juristictions)this give people a new perspective on a.i. for people to think about.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
The literal opposite is happening: companies are being forced to use AI to keep up, but tokens are expensive.
So, now AI is trading tokens in exchange for equity in the customer's company.
The businesses that don't use AI are developing slower, and those who are using AI are becoming the property of the AI companies.
Soon, every new and successful company will be owned primarily by AI. You will own nothing and...
Ok but that's not the point of the post.
The point is "is at least some of humanity adapting a new perspective?".
I guess so.
One thing, as we put more AI- generated content online, new models being trained that rely on webscraping will get more and more skewed/burned/overtuned.
In the end, the noise will overtake the information and we'll get convergence:
Why do all random graphs end up identical
Pretty sure a.i. is just the data collection(as pertains to us. As far as pertains to the overlords...sky is the limit