So i was wondering about how both the [fake and gay] and the [obvious NASA psyops] could coordinate together.
Basic suppositions: Flat Earth is a decoy, NASA is fully controlled.
If Both the official NASA narrative and the controlled FE opposition move to obfuscate reality, what is that reality?
My best bet accounting for the grand schemes of things would be this:
NASA is the main conduit for black budget and it is mainly involved in turning space into a stage to deceive everyone about earth, while only requiring a fraction of said budget to do so and channeling the rest to DUMBs, various secret experiments and technology research.
The earth is either just bigger, or, the shape calculations are purposefully flawed (saw some funny stuff in there? but not an expert) to hide it's not oblated at the poles, but somewhere near the equator, so as to hide the land beyond the poles from public view and mind.
Well it's not the way i see it but i can see why you would choose that approach.
About the FE psyop though, you said it well yourself:
And this seems to me the whole point of having FE around for TPTB. Even if i had some provable data to justify my theory in this regard, i'd already be the 'FE adjacent guy' anyway to most people.
This is not to add anything to my simple bet, no data is no data. i am only using it now as an example to show you what i mean with how the FE relates to the wider infowar.
Yes, I understand that. This is why I always ask people why they believe in FE or any other "adjacent" thing. It is also why I will watch the various "influencers" to see their arguments. There was a time I would have by default believed in global warming, the holocaust, and that Hitler was a really bad guy. I changed my views on all of these things because people made factual arguments that forced me to change.
I guess what I'm saying is FE and other similar things about the shape of the earth are perpetually in this state of "this is the biggest lie of all but you gotta watch out for all the obvious disinfo trying to make us look stupid." I would be sympathetic to that if I was then directed to the person / people who had the really good arguments. But after years of every big name in this space eventually being turned into a shill, I have to assume that there is no "Stephen McIntyre" or "Germar Rudolf" in this space.
I will also acknowledge that it is possible that NASA lies, even about the moon landing, while the earth is in fact as described in geodesy books. I personally am not big into NASA conspiracies, but those are a lot more believable. For the shape of the earth to be substantially wrong, enormous sectors of society would have to be in on the conspiracy. Military, transportation, various branches of science, cartography, the navigation apps on your phone. It is an extraordinary claim, and at a minimum the people who claim this need to provide a workable map and a rough explanation for basic solar system observations (day, night, moon cycles, seasons, tides, apparent planet paths, etc.).