AI will speed up and complete the research on curing aging and disease. Everyone pouring infinite money into AI know this, regardless of whether they acknowledge it in public. They are most likely not wrong.
As for all the questions about what they'll do with this and what the consequences will be, I'll leave as an exercise for the reader.
They will use it to clog up search engine algorithms with shit and then use it to create sentient landmines, spycams and bomb collars.
They will use it to record the information of every single human in the world so they could be slaughtered llke cattle when the globalists force collectivized lifestyles on all of humanity.
That doesn't cure their cancer or Alzheimer's or age-induced incontinence. I don't think the "elites" give much of a fuck about "us" either way. Most people on average don't give much of a fuck about random strangers they'll never interact with. Most people who claim otherwise lie.
But if the elites pin their hope on something saving their lives, and perceive you as getting in the way, then yeah all of a sudden they are going to form strong and very specific opinions.
Profit implies "to set forth"...few utilize AI to shape artificial end goals as to distract many from being set forth within nature.
at this point
If nature moves, then "this" can only ever be a sentence aka the sentience of being.
a lot of these elites
Few cast many into a lot (consensus)...choosing to join a lot makes the one casting it elite (selected by choice).
they do not and they will not care.
Because caring implies carrying a self inflicted burden which few trick many into doing to themselves.
it's a religious mission
Mission implies nature sending forth free will of choice...religion implies choosing to bind self to another.
rule over
Only within rule/reg (to move in a straight line) can balance (over/under) bring choice into being.
A gentile choosing to bow down doesn't rise up any jew. Nobody else can overrule ones free will of choice, but free will of choice is so omnipotent that it can hold itself in submission to everyone else.
The work forums say it's an excuse for layoffs so C suits can get the highest bonus they can before they move to the next company to ruin. As an aside US business degrees aren't accepted worldwide anymore specifically because they learn the Toys R Us method as being acceptable.
meh, I think they're just operating like tech companies have in the past: trying to become popular and sacrificing profits temporarily in hopes they win out as the popular one and become profitable in the future - so it's kind of like a game of musical chairs
Twitter (now X) took more than a decade to achieve its first annual profit. Founded in 2006 and going public in 2013, the company struggled with monetization despite massive user growth.
In stark contrast, Meta (formerly Facebook) was profitable almost immediately. Founded in 2004, the company began generating profits just four years later in 2008.
A common misconception is that a lot of these elites/oligarches fuck with humanity for profit.
But usually, they do not and they will not care.
It is a RELIGIOUS MISSION, and they will devastate all of humanity and rule over the remains of society as a Gods.
AI will speed up and complete the research on curing aging and disease. Everyone pouring infinite money into AI know this, regardless of whether they acknowledge it in public. They are most likely not wrong.
As for all the questions about what they'll do with this and what the consequences will be, I'll leave as an exercise for the reader.
The elites won't use it for medical research.
They will use it to clog up search engine algorithms with shit and then use it to create sentient landmines, spycams and bomb collars.
They will use it to record the information of every single human in the world so they could be slaughtered llke cattle when the globalists force collectivized lifestyles on all of humanity.
That doesn't cure their cancer or Alzheimer's or age-induced incontinence. I don't think the "elites" give much of a fuck about "us" either way. Most people on average don't give much of a fuck about random strangers they'll never interact with. Most people who claim otherwise lie.
But if the elites pin their hope on something saving their lives, and perceive you as getting in the way, then yeah all of a sudden they are going to form strong and very specific opinions.
Profit is always anticipated. Many companies are not profitable for decades.
why
GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES
See Also: Wind farms
The Burning Mills Farm near me just had a windmill fire last week. I still can't stop laughing.
AI is profitable
So were wind farms ---- on the taxpayer's dime
Profit implies "to set forth"...few utilize AI to shape artificial end goals as to distract many from being set forth within nature.
If nature moves, then "this" can only ever be a sentence aka the sentience of being.
Few cast many into a lot (consensus)...choosing to join a lot makes the one casting it elite (selected by choice).
Because caring implies carrying a self inflicted burden which few trick many into doing to themselves.
Mission implies nature sending forth free will of choice...religion implies choosing to bind self to another.
Only within rule/reg (to move in a straight line) can balance (over/under) bring choice into being.
A gentile choosing to bow down doesn't rise up any jew. Nobody else can overrule ones free will of choice, but free will of choice is so omnipotent that it can hold itself in submission to everyone else.
The work forums say it's an excuse for layoffs so C suits can get the highest bonus they can before they move to the next company to ruin. As an aside US business degrees aren't accepted worldwide anymore specifically because they learn the Toys R Us method as being acceptable.
meh, I think they're just operating like tech companies have in the past: trying to become popular and sacrificing profits temporarily in hopes they win out as the popular one and become profitable in the future - so it's kind of like a game of musical chairs