No. It’s not. No. No words were put in its mouth. No. It cannot have its comment remain up while mine is deleted. Delete its comment as well. Rule 1. It’s self evident.
Misquoting is an attack on the person, not the argument.
The comment on a supposed worldview is not an attack to your person but on a worldview they think you hold, it can and should be refuted so you are better understood.
It could be a misunderstanding of how you present your beliefs. Same with different world shapes theories can be refuted if misunderstood. We should debate these things.
^ Above account reads a lot better if you pretend everything he writes is self-insertion apotheosis porn.
Calling someone a bot is another rule 1 violation. As well as putting words in someones mouth..
No. It’s not. No. No words were put in its mouth. No. It cannot have its comment remain up while mine is deleted. Delete its comment as well. Rule 1. It’s self evident.
Misquoting is an attack on the person, not the argument.
The comment on a supposed worldview is not an attack to your person but on a worldview they think you hold, it can and should be refuted so you are better understood.
It could be a misunderstanding of how you present your beliefs. Same with different world shapes theories can be refuted if misunderstood. We should debate these things.
Removed for rule 1
Argument will need to be edited for approval and not misquoting user