What would happen to a modern(ish) country is every power plant, bridge, and water treatment plant were destroyed inside a one week period?
The US could certainly do this. But it might not be advisable.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
Extreme minority opinion (of one, so far as I can tell): The "US war in Iran" is mostly fake.
The whole thing is absurd from a military standpoint. Iran's air defense is probably 2nd only to Russia, and they can barely get a shot off? Every reported shootdown is extremely mysterious with zero details. The US claims to have completely suppressed air defenses in a few weeks, while Russia is still working SEAD on their next door neighbor 4 years on. It's all ludicrous.
The only destruction I would surmise is going on in Iran is of two types. One is Israel firing a small number of missiles and drones, then letting it be blamed on the US in hopes of antagonizing Iran. The other--and this would be extremely limited--is the US military going after rogue elements of the IRGC that did not and will not adhere to civilian authority. Shit, they're probably run by Mossad officers.
In the meantime, "The Jewish State" is getting systematically worked over by Iranian missile and drone strike. We're up over 100 waves, averaging at least 100 projectiles. Israeli air defense is for display only.
That's a lot of blown up things on the ground and it's why we're getting essentially zero information about damage. This is going to be their last dance and they know it.
I do know for a fact and from people on the ground that there is indeed destruction. Some of which is NOT being reported. But it's interesting that you "Primate98" is pushing for the Jewish line of: everything is fake narrative....
A lot more Americans died than reported BTW.
He only blames parkers, not Jews.
I'm glad when people take the effort to carefully examine what I write, because I put a lot of effort into it. It's particularly gratifying when they make it all the way through the first sentence before it gets blurred into whatever is going on inside their head.
You can pretend otherwise but you know quite well that you did your part in nudging towards the (and I repeat): "The everything is fake narrative".
Your comments were simply a more mild version of Jewish Miles Mathis.
To narrate implies "relating particulars" aka carrying parts together. Nature doesn't narrate...it particulates being.
Narration represents fake; particularization implies real. That's how a jew controls the narrative by artificially narrating nature to gentiles.
You know what disappoints me about conspiracy theorists? Given the rise of generative AI and the incredible amount of attention and controversy it has generated in conspiracist circles, I have yet to see one post questioning any of the numerous videos of purported US airstrikes. A couple of points to be made about that.
First, even if they were all authentic, how could no one even raise the question? You can't tell at a glance, that's for sure. Frankly, even at a glance, they all look like they came out of de-rezzed video games.
The second point is related to the first, and is even more vital. I've come across uncountable fakes in history that are as obviously phony as the walls of a house in a stage play. The only way They get away with it is that no one is actually looking to see if they're fake.
I think normies simply cannot comprehend that these things might be phony, and almost all conspiracy theorists are focused on being right about whatever they think they're right about.
What a world we live in, when you actually stop to look around.