There is no evidence of a historical Jesus. But, that doesn't mean he didn't exist. Maybe there were many Jesuses at different times in the history of mankind, when we needed someone to wake us up. Maybe instead of calling them Jesus we could just simply call them Awaken.
Lol his existence is not in dispute. His divinity is. That's such an ignorant statement, but what can you expect from low level hand shakes. You basically have to choose between believing in written history and his existence or not believing anything from written history and his nonexistence.
You basically have to choose between believing in written history and his existence or not believing anything from written history and his existence
You can believe anything you want to believe. I'm fine with that. But, I don't have to choose anything that you suggest.
Lol his existence is not in dispute. His divinity is.
By divinity you mean the Holy Trinity, that is... God is nothing and everything? isn't why emperor Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea in 325? to affirm the full divinity of Jesus, declaring him to be of the same homoousios as God, rather than a created being. To me Trinity means God is both real and not real. God is a symbol and reality itself. It is the weirdest idea I've ever come across in my life. btw, you can laugh all you wish, I don't care.
Bro is out here doing some level 1 attacks bringing up nicea. Educate yourself young one. There were many councils reconciling many issues. You can nit pick the argument all you want but the general statement stands. If you don't trust written History then nothing you haven't personally witnessed has ever truly occured. It's all fake news, ai, white washed, written by the victor. Whatever you want to call it. So just remember if he isn't real (as a person not his supernatural existence) then nothing is. Not George Washington. Not ceaser. None of it. It's all Harry Potter. If you want to be a midwit arguing semantics then you do you booboo. My faith is not based on nothing unlike most secular pieces of shit.
There is no evidence of a historical Jesus. But, that doesn't mean he didn't exist. Maybe there were many Jesuses at different times in the history of mankind, when we needed someone to wake us up. Maybe instead of calling them Jesus we could just simply call them Awaken.
Lol his existence is not in dispute. His divinity is. That's such an ignorant statement, but what can you expect from low level hand shakes. You basically have to choose between believing in written history and his existence or not believing anything from written history and his nonexistence.
You can believe anything you want to believe. I'm fine with that. But, I don't have to choose anything that you suggest.
By divinity you mean the Holy Trinity, that is... God is nothing and everything? isn't why emperor Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea in 325? to affirm the full divinity of Jesus, declaring him to be of the same homoousios as God, rather than a created being. To me Trinity means God is both real and not real. God is a symbol and reality itself. It is the weirdest idea I've ever come across in my life. btw, you can laugh all you wish, I don't care.
Bro is out here doing some level 1 attacks bringing up nicea. Educate yourself young one. There were many councils reconciling many issues. You can nit pick the argument all you want but the general statement stands. If you don't trust written History then nothing you haven't personally witnessed has ever truly occured. It's all fake news, ai, white washed, written by the victor. Whatever you want to call it. So just remember if he isn't real (as a person not his supernatural existence) then nothing is. Not George Washington. Not ceaser. None of it. It's all Harry Potter. If you want to be a midwit arguing semantics then you do you booboo. My faith is not based on nothing unlike most secular pieces of shit.