If non-living matter cannot become living, a higher being must have created life and not chance.

posted 4 days ago by Plemethrock 4 days ago by Plemethrock +11 / -0

This is just common sense right? A higher being creating us logically makes sense.

17 comments

17 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (17)

sorted by:

▲ 5 ▼

– Dregan_ya 5 points 3 days ago +5 / -0

Where did the Chemical Evolution of Natural Product Structure get started?

Did it just form outta nothing or did someone get that ball rolling?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– IGOexiled 3 points 3 days ago +3 / -0

You're speaking of electronegativity and energy levels?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Plemethrock [S] 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

That doesn’t make a non-living thing living. Just creates more non-living things of a bigger or different type.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Graphenium 1 point 3 days ago +1 / -0

Why does anything exist?

No no no no no don't reach for that word. There's no 'reason'. That's teleology and teleology will stitch your eyelids shut.

Why do we have atoms? Because atomic matter is more stable than the primordial broth. Atoms defeated the broth. That was the first war. There were two ways to be and one of them won. And everything that came next was made of atoms.

Atoms made stars. Stars made galaxies. Worlds simmered down to rock and acid and in those smoking primal seas the first living molecule learned to copy itself. All of this happened by the one law, the blind law, which exists without mind or meaning. It's the simplest law but it has no worshippers here (out there, though, out there - !)

permalink parent save report block reply