When people make these kinds of interpretations, it makes me wonder what did John of Patmos see? Did he see the Mar-a-Lago and understand the Spanish name with which to write it down? Perhaps he actually saw the Beast of the Sea rise from the sea and God was like, "yeah, someone will figure out the connection to a building some guy owns in a couple thousand years give or take". It all seems extremely tenuous
I read it more literally. Not under the influence of drugs, has your mind ever wandered and pictured a storyline play out? Maybe it’s based on a memory or it could be a premonition. You don’t see these images through your physical eyes, even though they could be open.
When people make these kinds of interpretations, it makes me wonder what did John of Patmos see?
Very funny...
I didn't interpret anything, I'm just looking at the symbology for what it is. Looks like you're still struggling with "which came first: the chicken or the egg?".
It's not a joke, it's serious. The Book of Revelation is the account of vision had by John of Patmos. So what did he actually see? Millions if not billions of people throughout the past couple millennia have tried to make heroic stretches to make the book fit their contemporary setting. If you think about what might have actually been seen or experienced, many of them fall outside the realm of possibility or probability, outside of God deciding that some truly crazy esoterism was in order. It is in an interpretation, as you are saying "there is a reason the building is called Mar-a-Lago" and then going on to link it directly to Scripture. That is an interpretation.
The rhetoric you've used here implies you either did not understand what I was saying, or you did understand and are trying to imply there's some kind of time paradox
then going on to link it directly to Scripture. That is an interpretation
Ok. That's what you mean by interpretation. Personally I was thinking they like to use symbology and follow a script for all their actions. Trump is a high-degree Freemason and a Kabbalist.
you either did not understand what I was saying
That's right I didn't understand what you were saying, but now you clarified that.
When people make these kinds of interpretations, it makes me wonder what did John of Patmos see? Did he see the Mar-a-Lago and understand the Spanish name with which to write it down? Perhaps he actually saw the Beast of the Sea rise from the sea and God was like, "yeah, someone will figure out the connection to a building some guy owns in a couple thousand years give or take". It all seems extremely tenuous
I read it more literally. Not under the influence of drugs, has your mind ever wandered and pictured a storyline play out? Maybe it’s based on a memory or it could be a premonition. You don’t see these images through your physical eyes, even though they could be open.
Very funny...
I didn't interpret anything, I'm just looking at the symbology for what it is. Looks like you're still struggling with "which came first: the chicken or the egg?".
It's not a joke, it's serious. The Book of Revelation is the account of vision had by John of Patmos. So what did he actually see? Millions if not billions of people throughout the past couple millennia have tried to make heroic stretches to make the book fit their contemporary setting. If you think about what might have actually been seen or experienced, many of them fall outside the realm of possibility or probability, outside of God deciding that some truly crazy esoterism was in order. It is in an interpretation, as you are saying "there is a reason the building is called Mar-a-Lago" and then going on to link it directly to Scripture. That is an interpretation.
The rhetoric you've used here implies you either did not understand what I was saying, or you did understand and are trying to imply there's some kind of time paradox
Ok. That's what you mean by interpretation. Personally I was thinking they like to use symbology and follow a script for all their actions. Trump is a high-degree Freemason and a Kabbalist.
That's right I didn't understand what you were saying, but now you clarified that.