Can you plausibly see how I could have wrote my title without watching the video?
These are small homes, it's a brick mold. He's applying his reset argument to small homes, and then going on to Question the existence of Sears and the Sears Catalog in 1915. The ability of a few people to build brick homes with a mail order brick mold, Is not something you can reasonably argue against to prove a great reset. Sears went on to provide mail order homes, yet they couldn't start with brick mold machinery in the 20th century?
He's making these bad arguments because of donations, pushing him to explore topics faster. He is being incentivized through money. This is how Hollywood works. It is how they became controlled assets. This is how controlled opposition is created.
"He calls out the absurdity of this product asking how does it even get delivered at a time of horse and wagon and trains."
And another faulty argument. As you can not claim that we are using old world rail systems, and then claim that people can not receive mail order brick mold machinery via rail in 1915. It's the size of a Singer Sewing machine. Only far less complex.
He's using the argument that Sears may have been a old world company in on the cover up with this weird product that makes no sense. It was an interesting observation that I had no idea existed and didn't come across as controlled opt IMO.
If it comes across as controlled opposition, then it's not working. The whole point of controlled opposition is the provide a straw man that is obviously false. It's best if the controlled asset isn't even aware of what they are doing. Take for example the original 17 year run of the Daily Show. That Jon Stewart sure seemed smart, didn't he? Why did he always win his arguments? Because he was only allowed to argue against controlled assets.
Did u watch the video?
He calls out the absurdity of this product asking how does it even get delivered at a time of horse and wagon and trains.
He alludes to it being a cover up of world structures.
Can you plausibly see how I could have wrote my title without watching the video?
These are small homes, it's a brick mold. He's applying his reset argument to small homes, and then going on to Question the existence of Sears and the Sears Catalog in 1915. The ability of a few people to build brick homes with a mail order brick mold, Is not something you can reasonably argue against to prove a great reset. Sears went on to provide mail order homes, yet they couldn't start with brick mold machinery in the 20th century?
He's making these bad arguments because of donations, pushing him to explore topics faster. He is being incentivized through money. This is how Hollywood works. It is how they became controlled assets. This is how controlled opposition is created.
And another faulty argument. As you can not claim that we are using old world rail systems, and then claim that people can not receive mail order brick mold machinery via rail in 1915. It's the size of a Singer Sewing machine. Only far less complex.
He's using the argument that Sears may have been a old world company in on the cover up with this weird product that makes no sense. It was an interesting observation that I had no idea existed and didn't come across as controlled opt IMO.
If it comes across as controlled opposition, then it's not working. The whole point of controlled opposition is the provide a straw man that is obviously false. It's best if the controlled asset isn't even aware of what they are doing. Take for example the original 17 year run of the Daily Show. That Jon Stewart sure seemed smart, didn't he? Why did he always win his arguments? Because he was only allowed to argue against controlled assets.
I don't think for a second Jon Levy or lunchbreak are controlled op.
Yes some episodes are redundant but as a whole they shine a light on issues tptb would rather be buried...pun intended.