Thanks! u/Graphenium:
The worldview expressed in the Law of One/“Ra Material” and the Hidden Hand interview
https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_societies/hidden_hand_081018
The way I see things, these two sources explain existence, the state of our world, and the meaning of life far more accurately than any other. One is a “channeled” work, and the other is a long series of Questions and Answers between a conspiracy forum (RiP ATS) and a self-proclaimed world-controller. I see them as complimentary, showing a deeper reality by showing two sides of the same coin. One side being that of Service-to-Others, and the other being Service-to-Self
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ASG9Vy4Tl/round-table-suggestion-thread/c
Thread will stay open for 3-4 weeks thanks to a very helpful suggestion.
Fair enough, that’s practically expected given the sources - I’d be surprised if anyone’s first reaction was something other than “channeling/illuminati? that sounds wetarded!” Or “im supposed to believe an ”evil person” is telling the truth?”. The whole reason I suggest the people here skip the summaries and just read the actual texts is so that they can augment their first reaction with their second, third, fourth, and so-on reactions. You of all people will know how easy it is to take one or two sentences of a work out of context to twist them into anything imaginable, im sure, as a mod of c/Christianity
Im just saying, wait until you’ve read as much as you can physically manage before setting that table! lol - something something angels unawares something something
Angels unawares indeed. These serve fugu.
Based Simpsons reference!
You’re the one setting the table, remember
It's older than Groening.
My point is that I'd rather partake whole meals than extricate what is negligible from a raft of poison that has killed others. See what you think of my initial statement.
Ironic considering the abrahamic faiths have caused literally billions of deaths, many of innocents and particularly of gnostics. Your initial statement strikes me much the same as every other time I’ve shared these links and you respond to what they think they say (filtered through your lifetime of cognitive biases) instead of what they actually say, after you briefly skim the summaries that i tell you to skip.