Thanks! u/Graphenium:
The worldview expressed in the Law of One/“Ra Material” and the Hidden Hand interview
https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_societies/hidden_hand_081018
The way I see things, these two sources explain existence, the state of our world, and the meaning of life far more accurately than any other. One is a “channeled” work, and the other is a long series of Questions and Answers between a conspiracy forum (RiP ATS) and a self-proclaimed world-controller. I see them as complimentary, showing a deeper reality by showing two sides of the same coin. One side being that of Service-to-Others, and the other being Service-to-Self
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ASG9Vy4Tl/round-table-suggestion-thread/c
Thread will stay open for 3-4 weeks thanks to a very helpful suggestion.
I will admittedly be approaching this subject with a bias. Anything that expressly comes from channeling or a self-proclaimed world-controller is suspect from the start because it only stands or falls on its accuracy and not on claims of its power due to its allegedly extraordinary source. My bias is likely to conclude that the material is composed essentially of a mix of trivialities and lies. Just letting you know before I start reading in detail, aside from the hints that u/Graphenium has given in the past. Even though I think I'm more open-minded than in my "past life" as a heresy hunter, I'm still not likely to give something self-identifying as "Ra" material a totally equal place at the table yet.
Unfortunately, the discussion doesn't start with a thesis and Graph is suggesting we not rely on the summary but on absorbing the whole as much as possible. So we probably should write our own propositional analyses.
Fair enough, that’s practically expected given the sources - I’d be surprised if anyone’s first reaction was something other than “channeling/illuminati? that sounds wetarded!” Or “im supposed to believe an ”evil person” is telling the truth?”. The whole reason I suggest the people here skip the summaries and just read the actual texts is so that they can augment their first reaction with their second, third, fourth, and so-on reactions. You of all people will know how easy it is to take one or two sentences of a work out of context to twist them into anything imaginable, im sure, as a mod of c/Christianity
Im just saying, wait until you’ve read as much as you can physically manage before setting that table! lol - something something angels unawares something something
Angels unawares indeed. These serve fugu.
Based Simpsons reference!
You’re the one setting the table, remember
It's older than Groening.
My point is that I'd rather partake whole meals than extricate what is negligible from a raft of poison that has killed others. See what you think of my initial statement.
I hope to have time to start digging into this today. Also our roundtables and featured docs are staying open for 3-4 (edit: weeks) or longer if needed now, so there's time for digging and discussion.