Thanks u/Plemethrock
We can have a discussion on whether or not free will exists. Discuss if every action we do is already predetermined by how our brain is wired, with the environment around us being the inputs.
We can also have a discussion on whether or not humans have souls and analyze the evidence for and against us just being our bodies
(I made an error and had to repost, apologies)
a) Round implies a shape confining free will of choice. Using the round table for discussion should also ring alarm bells in terms of conspiracy, since it was Rothschild agent Cecil Rhodes who set up the Round Table Movement in Britain to orchestrate WWI, out of which came for example the Royal Institute of International Affairs (1920); the Council on Foreign Relations (1921); the Bilderberg Group (1954) and the Trilateral Commission (1972).
b) Does implies DO (to do) ES (essence) aka action doing reaction aka choice reacting to an enacting balance.
c) IT implies the third person, which distracts one from second/seco - "to divide"...only within a divide can there be choice.
All sets each one within free by division aka divination.
d) Exist aka EX (to express) IST (to consent to an -ism) STENCE (to stand)
Ex implies ones expressing choice within impressing balance, while stance implies balancing as choice, as in...to stand requires one to balance in-between left/right + front/back + up/down, which implies adaptation by free will of choice.
It's the IST (ex-ist) which tempts one into imbalance by tricking choice to hold onto a side within an ISM (existential-ism). Consenting to any suggested -ism also inverts ones choice into a chosen one.
-ist implies consent given; -ism implies a suggested consensus...it's a racket by few to tempt many together by sacrificing free will of choice.
d) FREE implies within dominance, WILL (want) implies within need; OF implies out of; within; in response to, and CHOICE implies within balance.
Few suggest "free will" without choice as to tempt many into sacrificing one choice by consenting to a liberty offered by a chosen one.
a) We (pluralism) confines one (singular)...if consented to by free will of choice.
b) Whether or not implies suggested creationism aka creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing)...only within everything can each thing wield free will of choice.
c) Discuss aka dis (to divide apart) quatere (to shake) implies a separation from one another....not turning against one another (weather or not) in conflict. Discussion implies analysis...taking a side within a discussion implies a synthesis. That's why no discussion among many can ever lead to more than more conflict among them.
a) Every implies action; each implies re-action aka responding to being enacted upon. All nature acts; each being within reacts to either to natural (perceivable) or artificial (suggested). How does one react? By free will of choice.
b) We aka the royal we aka the majestic plural aka nosism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we That's a trick by few to collectivize many together aka tempting each ones free will of choice into a binding consensus within one another. That's also the origin of commonwealth under a sovereign.
c) Choice (free) can only come into being within balance (dominance)...that's the origin of free-dom aka dominance (inception towards death) setting free (life). That's the predetermination for each ones free will of choice...which one ignores when consenting to suggested terms by another.
If one consents to any suggested terms, then the chosen one suggesting can a) shape the terms by free will of choice, and b) utilize the predetermination of nature against the ignorant being who willingly chose to follow artificial terms.
Notice the jewish rite of Kol Nidre aka "repudiating all vows, and prohibitions, and oaths, and consecrations, and konamei and kinusei and synonymous terms, that we may vow, or swear, or consecrate, or prohibit upon ourselves"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kol_Nidre
This day of atonement is utilized to set free will of choice free from any self imposed boundaries...gentiles using "free will" without choice are willingly ignoring the choice to set oneself free from bondage to jewish contracts.
Wire/wei - "to turn"...that implies self confinement aka turning within self (logic) and against another (reason). Only during delineation (input towards output) can a brain come into being. It's ones consent to suggested pluralism (our), while mentally taking possession of it, which tricks ones brain into self confinement.
En (within) viron (circle) ment (mind)... once again self confinement by shaping a mental circle, while ignoring physical (life) delineation (inception towards death).
Now guess who gets rid of surrounding environment by erecting at center while cutting off circumference during the rite of circumcision? Few are centralizing control by tricking many into a mental (logic) and physical (reason) environment.
Being implies pouring out (expressed reaction) while being put into (enacting impression). The process of dying implies input; living within implies output, hence being put in (inception) and out (death) of being (life).
a) Soul/sole implies "one and only" aka singularity...not plurality.
b) Hu/hue implies "color" aka spectrum (momentum) of light (motion) for each ray (matter) within. It's the light dividing into a spectrum through each ray within, which implies the soul aka the singularity moving through each singular unit.
Motion (inception towards death) implies the soul of each matter (life).
a) Few suggest for vs against as a conflict to distract many from nature FORwarding (inception towards death) A GAIN of being (life).
b) Evidence implies perceivable distinction from one another (analysis)...not suggested evidence shared with one another (synthesis). Synthesizing during analysis establishes "analysis paralysis"...few suggest pluralism (us; our) to tempt many into analysis paralysis by willingly joining a synthetic group, which confines each analytical being within a consensus.
The origin of artificially putting together what nature sets apart from one another is a game called "puzzle"...formerly known as "mosaic" aka mosaic law aka moses/mosheh - "to mosh; mash".