I'm not reporting this, but: By current standards "retarded" is deprecated (I would affirm someone posting a community vote on Rule 1). By my standards "troglodyte behavior" shouldn't be deprecated because it's about behavior rather than person, and "no reading comprehension" shouldn't be because it's implied to be based on available evidence; but I don't know the mods' current standards.
You guys are even more gay than most dyke Human Resources employees.
This feels like some kind of emergency Human Resources intervention because someone in the government office building said "retard" and the middle aged lesbian cat lady who was shopping amazon on taxpayer time overheard it and felt offended from the isolation of her cubicle.
I literally began the discussion on this three months ago and nobody proposed the idea that abuse was not abusive. Now that people are proposing that, I think the free-for-all idea actually settles that concern too.
I'm not reporting this, but: By current standards "retarded" is deprecated (I would affirm someone posting a community vote on Rule 1). By my standards "troglodyte behavior" shouldn't be deprecated because it's about behavior rather than person, and "no reading comprehension" shouldn't be because it's implied to be based on available evidence; but I don't know the mods' current standards.
Yes, I think reading comprehension can be questioned without using the word retard.
You guys are even more gay than most dyke Human Resources employees.
This feels like some kind of emergency Human Resources intervention because someone in the government office building said "retard" and the middle aged lesbian cat lady who was shopping amazon on taxpayer time overheard it and felt offended from the isolation of her cubicle.
I literally began the discussion on this three months ago and nobody proposed the idea that abuse was not abusive. Now that people are proposing that, I think the free-for-all idea actually settles that concern too.