You apparently have not read your own link, as it concludes the firebombing of Dreaden was entirely necessary and could have been avoided only by Hitler, who insisted on the destruction of his own people and Nation exactly as I've been telling you.
You claim Goebbels didn't contribute to nazi violence, and submit links demonstrating the moral necessity of firebombing Dresden trying to justify Hitler.
History is written by the winners. Sure they killed just 35K people in a city of more than 600K habitats. It seems you have been told lies and never questioned anything. If you did your assumptions and questions were all wrong. Six gorillion yay!
No. That's a definition derived from the polical correctness movement. Speech is not action. Elevating speech to the same status of kinetic action is a political tool designed to persecute dissidents.
Here's the thing, we can all free think without ad hominem
I'd really love to wear your pink sunglasses but unfortunately we're not made all equals hence the differences. Some are worse than others due to genetic entropy. That's why they resort to verbal violence, and those lower on the intelligence scale become physically violent. Though there are quick and easy solutions to that problem but you decided to take a different route. Give it time and you'll get there the same way many of us did.
I linked a declassified article from the DoD now DoW. Read that then come back so we can discuss history.
Still he did not kill nor ordered anyone to be killed. Obama killed more people than Goebbels.
You apparently have not read your own link, as it concludes the firebombing of Dreaden was entirely necessary and could have been avoided only by Hitler, who insisted on the destruction of his own people and Nation exactly as I've been telling you.
Suuure.
Are you gonna call mommy again with the report menu?
From my perspective you're the one who literally have got nothing kek
You can't even follow a conversation.
You claim Goebbels didn't contribute to nazi violence, and submit links demonstrating the moral necessity of firebombing Dresden trying to justify Hitler.
SMH
History is written by the winners. Sure they killed just 35K people in a city of more than 600K habitats. It seems you have been told lies and never questioned anything. If you did your assumptions and questions were all wrong. Six gorillion yay!
ZOG bots just run programs. They are incapable of independent thought.
You've got nothing but assumptions here. Come back if you ever come up with anything better.
No, she tried to deflect the conversation to history when the topic is freedom of speech.
Again, how to tell you're a jew without saying it SicSemperPaedico.
Edit: as asked
Rule 1 Rephrase requested
This has been edited to detract what was directed at the user being replied to. And it's borderline.
On the irony! LOL
You've got nuthin'
Inciting violence is violence..
No. That's a definition derived from the polical correctness movement. Speech is not action. Elevating speech to the same status of kinetic action is a political tool designed to persecute dissidents.
You've lost the plot. The topic here is Goebbels, and you pretending he didn't contribute to nazi violence.
I follow a higher rule set than secular politics..
I'd really love to wear your pink sunglasses but unfortunately we're not made all equals hence the differences. Some are worse than others due to genetic entropy. That's why they resort to verbal violence, and those lower on the intelligence scale become physically violent. Though there are quick and easy solutions to that problem but you decided to take a different route. Give it time and you'll get there the same way many of us did.
So what I'm hearing is we should better than resorting to those low intelligence tactics, right?
Maybe this is news to you but the guys who invented political correctness have declared its obsolescence.
https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-884229
Edit: here's some legal context that might change your views on this matter.
https://haam.org/politically-correct-america-a-nation-in-fear/
Thanks for the info. I don't actually care what the world thinks and defines, I know the Guy that created the whole place and all words.
Don't so-what-you-are-saying me. The problem isn't speech.it's trolling every single time we notice.
Also, please start another thread as this one literally reached rock bottom.
Check the other link I pasted on that reply after an edit and please review your position on the matter.
I just started reading it when I saw it edit.
Here's the thing, we can all free think without ad hominem