Two things. Firstly good luck reasoning with that guy. Secondly his username alludes to an event where hundreds of thousands innocents mostly women and children were burned to death.
JG is a name of a violent situation/person too. I banned one user for a violent username that was overt.
Both JG and DF are both 'people' that really existed. I wish both would rethink their names but it's not overly violent, tho those in the know, know.
And a reminder that resorting to ad hominem (along with all fallacies) often makes one look emoti(o)nal, desperate and out of actual answers or rebuttals, in other words, you've lost, at least keep your dignity and integrity and try again another time having hopefully learned something.
The guy comes here and derails a post because jews are conspiring to kill White babies and he doesn't like that then he starts throwing insults around. I responded to his insults by ridiculing him and you pay attention to one word. Would you mind taking a step back and looking at the whole picture? I'd like to discuss the matter with interested people so we can get to the bottom of this without the fireworks of DresdenFirebomber. His username is Interesting too. Do a google search on it, you might get surprised.
What will it take for everyone to discuss things without resorting to middle school tactics, absolutely ludicrous and yeah, looks like I have a bunch of shoveling to keep up and it's such a waste of everyone's time.. We're in the middle of a learning curve and I'm trying to help people make better choices on their own. Will you be helpful?
What? The guy can call for violence and you get offended by a noun that describes a color?
I didn't see violence from him. Some wording is questionable and I'm talking that over with him.
Two things. Firstly good luck reasoning with that guy. Secondly his username alludes to an event where hundreds of thousands innocents mostly women and children were burned to death.
"innocents"
They were as "innocent" as Palestinians.
JG is a name of a violent situation/person too. I banned one user for a violent username that was overt.
Both JG and DF are both 'people' that really existed. I wish both would rethink their names but it's not overly violent, tho those in the know, know.
I'd love for you to prove said violent association.
Dresden is a city in Germany, not a person..
https://media.defense.gov/2013/May/23/2001329959/-1/-1/0/Dresden%20again.pdf
https://www.nytimes.com/1964/03/01/archives/overkill-over-the-destruction-of-dresden-by-david-irving.html
Goebbels did not kill any unarmed citizen. If he did show us the photographic and documental proofs.
Edit: added NYT article from 1945
I look for the violence. Can we please let go of the infighting name calling?
From a different comment with someone else: There is no actual reason to need to use derogatory language, it's actually counterproductive, did you read my rules post? https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARws81ezP/understanding-the-rules-in-this-/c
The guy comes here and derails a post because jews are conspiring to kill White babies and he doesn't like that then he starts throwing insults around. I responded to his insults by ridiculing him and you pay attention to one word. Would you mind taking a step back and looking at the whole picture? I'd like to discuss the matter with interested people so we can get to the bottom of this without the fireworks of DresdenFirebomber. His username is Interesting too. Do a google search on it, you might get surprised.
What will it take for everyone to discuss things without resorting to middle school tactics, absolutely ludicrous and yeah, looks like I have a bunch of shoveling to keep up and it's such a waste of everyone's time.. We're in the middle of a learning curve and I'm trying to help people make better choices on their own. Will you be helpful?
I am being helpful. I'm not the one derailing posts with spam, insults, and death threats.